Assessment of data quality for evaluations of manual pavement distress

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2170, 2010, Pages 1-8

  Bogus, Susan M ^a   Migliaccio, Giovanni C ^a,b   Cordova, Arturo A ^a  

^a MSC01 1070   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSET MANAGEMENT; CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE; DATA ACQUISITION; PAVEMENTS; QUALITY CONTROL; SURVEYS;

'CURRENT; ASSET MANAGEMENT PROJECTS; CONDITION; CONDITION SURVEYS; CURRENT ASSETS; DATA COLLECTION; DATA QUALITY; MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATIONS; PAVEMENT DISTRESS; TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES;

COST EFFECTIVENESS;

EID: 78651312023     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2170-01     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Haas, R., W. R. Hudson, and J. Zaniewski. Modern Pavement Management. Krieger Publishing, Malamar, Fla., 1994.
2. The New Mexico Department of Transportation's Pavement Inspection Program: A Successful Partnership. New Mexico Department of Transportation, Santa Fe, 2009.
3. Rada, G. R., R. K. Bhandari, G. E. Elkins, and W. Y. Bellinger. Assessment of Long-Term Pavement Performance Program Manual Distress Data Variability: Bias and Precision. In Transportation Research Record 1592, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 151-168.
4. Keller, G., and J. Sherar. Low-Volume Roads Engineering-Best Management Practices Field Guide. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 2003.
5. Low Volume Road Fact Sheet. Transportation Engineering and Road Research Alliance. www.terraroadalliance.org/publications/factsheets/lvr.html. Accessed March 1, 2010.
6. Coghlan, G. T. Transportation in the New Millennium: Opportunities for Low-Volume Roads. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
7. TranSafety, Inc. Low Volume Road Safety. Road Management & Engineering Journal. www.usroads.com/journals/rej/9702/re970204.htm. Accessed March 1, 2010.
8. Grobler, J. A., A. Taute, and I. Joubert. Pavement Evaluation and Rehabilitation Design Methodology Currently Used on Low-Volume Roads in Southern Africa. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1819, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 343-352.
9. Soria, M. H. A., and E. B. Fontenele. Field Evaluation of Method for Rating Unsurfaced Road Conditions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1819, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 267-272.
10. Khedaywi, T. S., E. Tons, and S. Bindra. Road Network, Materials, and Evaluation in Jordan. In Transportation Research Record 1106, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 188-195.
11. Riverson, J. D. N., K. C. Sinha, C. F. Scholer, and V. L. Anderson. Evaluation of Subjective Rating of Unpaved County Roads in Indiana. In Transportation Research Record 1128, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 53-61.
12. Galton, F. Regression Towards Mediocrity in Hereditary Stature. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, Vol. 15, 1886, pp. 246-263.
13. Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 2003.
14. Galton, F. Co-Relations and Their Measurement, Chiefly from Anthropometric Data. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1888, pp. 135-145.
15. Bobko, P. Correlation and Regression: Applications for Industrial Organizational Psychology and Management. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2001.
16. Shrout, P. E., and J. L. Fleiss. Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 86, No. 2, 1979, pp. 420-428.
17. Kendall, M. G. Rank Correlation Methods. Charles Griffin and Co., London, 1955.
18. Goodman, L., and W. Kruskal. Measures of Association for Cross- Classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 49, 1954, pp. 732-764.
19. Cohen, J. A. Coefficient for Agreement for Nominal Scales. Education and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 20, 1960, pp. 37-46.
20. Schmidt, F. L., and J. E. Hunter. Interrater Reliability Coefficients Cannot Be Computed When Only One Stimulus Is Rated. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 2, 1989, pp. 368-370.
21. Kozlowski, S. W., and K. Hattrup. A Disagreement About Within-Group Agreement: Disentangling Issues of Consistency Versus Consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 77, No. 2, 1992, pp. 161-167.
22. Burke, M. J., L. M. Finkelstein, and M. S. Dusig. On Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater Agreement. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 2. No. 1, 1999, p. 49.
23. James, L. R., R. G. Demaree, and G. Wolf. Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability With and Without Response Bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 69, No. 1, 1984, pp. 85-98.
24. Lindell, M. K., C. J. Brandt, and D. J. Whitney. A Revised Index of Interrater Agreement for Multi-Item Ratings of a Single Target. Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1999, p. 127.
25. LeBreton, J. M., and J. L. Senter. Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2008, p. 815.
26. Miller, J. S., and W. Y. Bellinger. Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program. Publication FHWA-RD- 03-031. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
27. Lebreton, J. M., J. R. Burgess, R. B. Kaiser, E. K. Atchley, and L. R. James. The Restriction of Variance Hypothesis and Interrater Reliability and Agreement: Are Ratings from Multiple Sources Really Dissimilar? Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2003, p. 80.