Life-cycle assessment of reconstruction options for interstate highway pavement in Seattle, Washington

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2170, 2010, Pages 18-27

  Weiland, Craig ^a   Muench, Stephen T ^b  

^a Kiewit Pacific Co   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING OF MATERIALS; ASPHALT; ASPHALT PAVEMENTS; CRACKS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GLOBAL WARMING; HIGHWAY ENGINEERING; PORTLAND CEMENT;

ASSESSMENT PROCESS; ENERGY USE; GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL; HIGHWAY PAVEMENT; HOT MIX ASPHALT; PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS; PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETES; SEATTLE; THREE REPLACEMENTS; WASHINGTON;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 78651309336     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2170-03     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hansen, M. A., J. P. Mahoney, N. C. Jackson, C. Hunter, L. M. Pierce, and G. Turkiyyah. Assessment of the I-5 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement in King County. Report WA-RD 682.1. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2007.
2. Scientific Applications International Corporation. Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice. Systems Analysis Branch, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, 2006.
3. Hendrickson, C. T., A. Horvath, S. Joshi, M. Klausner, L. B. Lave, and F. C. McMichael. Comparing Two Life Cycle Assessment Approaches: A Process Model- Vs. Economic Input-Output-Based Assessment. Proc., IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 1997, pp. 176-181.
4. UWME Design for Environment Lab. Life Cycle Assessment, 2009. http:// faculty.washington.edu/cooperjs/Definitions/life-cycle-assessment.htm. Accessed Jan. 20, 2009.
5. Washington State DOT Pavement Guide, Vol. 1. Pavement Policy. Environmental and Engineering Programs Division, HQ Materials Laboratory- Pavements Division, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2009.
6. Halil, C., R. Mathews, T. Kota, K. Gopalakrishnan, and B. J. Coree. Rehabilitation of Concrete Pavements Utilizing Rubblization and Crack and Seat Methods. IHRB Project TR-473. Iowa Highway Research Board, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, 2005.
7. Stubstand, R., M. Darter, C. Rao, T. Pyle, and T. Walid. Report on the Effectiveness of Diamond Grinding Concrete Pavements in California. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2005.
8. User's Guide for the Final NONROAD2005 Model. Report EPA420-R- 05-013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 2005.
9. Regulatory Announcement: Summary of EPA's Proposed Program for Low Emission Nonroad Diesel Engines and Fuel. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 2003. http://www.epa.gov/nonroaddiesel/420f03008.pdf. Accessed Apr. 21, 2009.
10. Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) Model. Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill., and University of Chicago, Center for Transportation Research, 1999.
11. Marceau, M. L., M. A. Nisbet, and M. G. VanGeem. Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Ill., 2007.
12. Stripple, H. Life Cycle Inventory of Asphalt Pavements. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd., Stockholm, Sweden, 2000.
13. U.S. Imports by Country of Origin. Energy Information Administration, 2008. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet-move-impcus-a2-nus-epc0-im0-mbblpd- a.htm. Accessed Jan. 20, 2009.
14. 2006 Washington State Electric Utility Fuel Mix. Washington State Department of Community, Trade & Economic Development, Olympia, 2007. http://www.cted.wa.gov/DesktopModules/CTEDPublications/CTEDPublicationsView. aspx?tabID=0&ItemID=4696&MId=863&wversion=Staging. Accessed Dec. 10, 2008.
15. Technology Options for the Near and Long Term. U.S. Climate Change Technology Program, 2003. http://climatetechnology.gov/library/2003/techoptions/ tech-options.pdf. Accessed Dec. 2, 2008.
16. Heijungs, R., and S. Suh. The Computational Structure of Life Cycle Assessment: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science. Springer, Secaucus, N.J., 2002.
17. Bare, J. C., G. A. Norris, D. W. Pennington, and T. McKone. TRACI: The Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts. Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 6, No. 3-4, 2003, pp. 49-78.
18. Huang, Y., R. Bird, and M. Bell. A Comparative Study of the Emissions by Road Maintenance Works and the Disrupted Traffic Using Life Cycle Assessment and Micro-Simulation. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 14, 2009, pp. 197-204.
19. Lee, E. B., H. Lee, and C. W. Ibbs. Productivity Aspects of Urban Freeway Rehabilitation with Accelerated Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, Vol. 133, No. 10, 2007, pp. 798-806.
20. Horvath, A., S. Pacca, E. Masanet, and R. Canapa. Pavement Life-Cycle Assessment Tool for Environmental and Economic Effects. Consortium on Green Design and Manufacturing, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
21. Birgisdottir, H., and K. A. Pihl. Life Cycle Assessment of Road Materials in the Danish Road Directorate. Nordic, No. 3, 2006. http://www.nordicroads. com/website/index.asp?pageID=60. Accessed Oct. 29, 2009.
22. The Green Path to Climate Neutral Roads: The IRF Greenhouse Gas Calculator. International Road Federation, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.irfnet.org/geneva/files-upload/Environment/Green%20House%20Gas/ GHG-ProjectSheet-website.pdf. Accessed Oct. 29, 2009.
23. Schussman, B., M. Pradhan, and S. Marciniak. NEPA Review and Impacts on Climate Change. Presented at 4th Annual National Environmental Policy Act SuperConference, San Francisco, Calif., 2008.
24. Gregoire, C. O., T. R. Kulongoski, J. Napolitano, B. Richardson, and A. Schwarzenegger. Western Regional Climate Action Initiative. Governor's Agreement Establishing the Western Regional Climate Action Initiative, 2007. http://www.westernclimateinitiative.org/component/remository/func-startdown/12. Accessed Oct. 29, 2009.