Foot orthoses in lower limb overuse conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis-critical appraisal and Commentary

Journal of Athletic Training

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 103-106

  Richter, Randy R ^a   Austin, Tricia M ^a   Reinking, Mark F ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651304030     PISSN: 10626050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.103     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Starkey C, Johnson G. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Athletic Training and Sports Medicine. 4th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2006.
2. Tiberio D. Pathomechanics of structural foot deformities. Phys Ther. 1988;68(12):1840-1849.
3. McMillan A, Payne C. Effect of foot orthoses on lower extremity kinetics during running: a systematic literature review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008;17(1):13.
4. Eickhoff CA, Hossain SA, Slawski DP. Effect of prescribed foot orthoses on medial tibial stress syndrome in collegiate cross-country runners. Clin Kinesiol. 2000;54(4):76-80.
5. Hawke F, Burns J, Radford JA, Du Toit V. Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, (3):CD006801, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006801. pub2
6. Collins N, Bisset L, McPoil T, Vicenzino B. Foot orthoses in lower limb overuse conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(3):396-412.
7. Simon SD. Understanding the odds ratio and the relative risk. J Androl. 2001;22(4):533-536.
8. Guyatt G, Drummond R, Meade MO, Cook DJ, eds. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008.
9. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10.
10. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(1):1013-1020.
11. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons; 2008:151-185.
12. Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, eds. Cochrane reviewer's handbook 4.2. Updated December 2003. In: The Cochrane Library. Issue 1. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
13. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Analyzing data and undertaking meta-analysis. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons; 2008:243-296.
14. Sim J, Reid N. Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization. Phys Ther. 1999;79(2):186-195.