Location choice model for logistic firms with consideration of spatial effects

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2168, 2010, Pages 17-23

  Nguyen, Y Cao ^a   Sano, Kazushi ^a  

^a NAGAOKA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCATION; MANUFACTURE;

CASE-STUDIES; CHOICE MODEL; DETERMINISTICS; ERROR TERMS; LOCATION CHOICE; LOGISTIC FIRMS; MIXED LOGIT MODELS; MODELLING FRAMEWORK; SPATIAL CORRELATIONS; SPATIAL EFFECT;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 78651301265     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2168-03     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ozmen-Ertekin, D., K. Ozbay, and J. Holguín-Veras. Role of Transportation Accessibility in Attracting Businesses to New Jersey. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 133, No. 2, 2007, pp. 138-149.
2. Leitham, S., R. W. McQuaid, and J. D. Nelson. The Influence of Transport on Industrial Location Choice: A Stated Preference Experiment. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 34, 2000, pp. 515-535.
3. Kawamura, K. Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Firm Location and Transportation Facilities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1747, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 97-103.
4. Sridhar, K. S. Firm Location Decisions and Impact on Local Economies, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 38, No. 39, 2003, pp. 4121-4130.
5. De Bok, M., and F. Sanders. Firm Relocation and Accessibility of Locations: Empirical Results from the Netherlands. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1902, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 35-43.
6. Chin, A., and J. Hong. The Location Decisions of Foreign Logistics Firms in China: Does Transport Network Capacity Matter? Singapore Centre for Applied and Policy Economics, 2005.
7. Targa, F., K. J. Clifton, and H. S. Mahmassani. Influence of Transportation Access on Individual Firm Location Decisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1977, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 179-189.
8. Sridhar, K. S., and G. Wan. Firm Location Choice in Cities: Evidence from China, India and Brazil. World Institute for Development Economics Research, Helsinki, Finland, 2007.
9. Boots, B. N., and P. S. Kanaroglou. Incorporating the Effect of Spatial Structure in Discrete Choices Models of Migration. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 28, 1988, pp. 495-507.
10. Dubin, R. A. Estimating Logit Models with Spatial Dependence. In New Directions in Spatial Econometrics (L. Anselin and R. Florax, eds.), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1995, pp. 229-242.
11. Paez, A., and J. Suzuki. Transportation Impacts on Land Use Changes: An Assessment Considering Neighborhood Effect. Journal of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 4, 2001, pp. 47-59.
12. Mohammadian, A., and P. S. Kanaroglou. Application of Spatial Multinomial Logit Model to Transportation Planning. Presented at 10th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, 2003.
13. Bhat, C. R., and J. Guo. A Mixed Spatially Correlated Logit Model: Formulation and Application to Residential Choice Modeling. Transportation Research Part B, No. 38, 2004, pp. 147-168.
14. Miyamoto, K., V. Vichiensan, N. Shimomura, and A. Paez. Discrete Choice Model with Structuralized Spatial Effects for Location Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1898, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 183-190.
15. Mohammadian, A., M. Haider, and P. S. Kanaroglou. Incorporating Spatial Dependencies in Random Parameter Discrete Choice Models. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
16. McFadden, D., and K. Train. Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2000, pp. 447-470.
17. Ben-Akiva, M., D. Bolduc, and J. Walker. Specification, Identifications, and Estimation of the Logit Kernel (or Continuous Mixed Logit) Model. 2001. p://elsa.berkeley.edu/reprints/misc/multinomial2.pdf.
18. Cliff, A. D., and J. K. Ord. Spatial Autocorrelation. Pion Limited, London, 1973.
19. McMillen, D. P. Probit with Spatial Autocorrelation. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1992, pp. 335-348.
20. Miaou, S., and D. Sui. Implications of Changing Demographic and Socioeconomic Structures on Highway Safety: A Texas Initiative, 2004, pp. 19-21.
21. Wisetjindawat, W., K. Sano, and S. Matsumoto. Commodity Distribution Model Incorporating Spatial Interactions for Urban Freight Movement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1966, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 41-50.
22. Train, K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2003.
23. De Bok, M. Explaining the Location Decision of Moving Firms Using Their Mobility Profile and the Accessibility of Locations. Journal of the European Regional Science Association, No. 4, 2004.
24. Holguín-Veras, J., N. Xu, H. Levinson, C. E. McKnight, R. D. Weiner, R. E. Paaswell, K. Ozbay, and D. Ozmen-Ertekin. An Investigation on the Aggregate Behavior of Firm Relocations to New Jersey (1990-1999) and the Underlying Market Elasticities. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 5, Sept. 2005, pp. 293-331.