Simulation training for gynecologic surgery

Contemporary Ob/Gyn

Volumn 55, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 30-38

  Cohen, Sarah L ^a   Chi, Chiung Grace Chen ^a   Satin, Andrew J ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BAYVIEW MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651290357     PISSN: 00903159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Fenner DE. Training of a gynecologic surgeon. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(1):193-196.
2. Pettigrew RA, Burns HJ, Carter DC. Evaluating surgical risk: the importance of technical factors in determining outcome. Br J Surg. 1987;74(9):791-794.
3. Russell RC. Surgical technique. Br J Surg. 1987;74(9):763-764.
4. Vassiliou MC, Ghitulescu GA, Feldman LS, et al. The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoscopic surgery: evidence for reliability. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(5):744-747.
5. Hasson HM. Simulation training in laparoscopy using a computerized physical reality simulator. JSLS. 2008;12(4):363-367.
6. Sansregret A, Fried G, Hasson H, et al. Choosing the right physical laparoscopic simulator? Comparison of LTS2000-ISM60 with MISTELS: validation, correlation, and user satisfaction. Am J Surg. 2009;197(2):258-265.
7. Coleman RL, Muller CY. Effects of a laboratory-based skills curriculum on laparoscopic proficiency: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(4):836-842.
8. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(3):272-283.
9. Banks EH, Chundnoff S, Karmin I, Wang C, Pardanani S. Does a surgical simulator improve resident operative per formance of laparoscopic tubal ligation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(5):541.e1-e5.
10. Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Aggarwal R, et al. Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(9):1460-1466.
11. Schrueder HW, van Dongen KW, Roeleveld SJ, Schijven MP, Broeders IA. Face and construct validity of virtual reality simulation of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):540.e1-540.e8.
12. Seymour N. VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg. 2008;32(2):182-188.
13. Grantcharov T P, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of vir tual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004;91(2):146-150.
14. Kundhal PS, Grantcharov TP. Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(3):645-649.
15. Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (1): CD006575.
16. Sutherland LM, Middleton P F, Anthony A, et al. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2006;243(3):291-300.
17. Kenney PA, Wszolek M F, Gould JJ, et al. Face, content, and construct validity of dV-Trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. Urology. 2009;73(6):1288-1292.
18. Burchard ER, Lockrow EG, Zahn CM, Dunlow SG, Satin AJ. Simulation training improves resident performance in operative hysteroscopic resection techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(5):542.e1-542.e4.
19. Bajka M, Tuchschmid S, Fink D, et al. Establishing construct validity of a vir tual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy via a multimetric scoring system. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(1):79-88.