Moving from aged care facilities to community-based accommodation: Outcomes and environmental factors

Brain Injury

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 153-168

  Winkler, Dianne ^a   Farnworth, Louise ^b   Sloan, Sue ^c   Brown, Ted ^b  

^a Summer Foundation Ltd   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c Sloan and Associates   (Australia)

Author keywords

Acquired brain injury; Aged care; Young adults

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN INJURY; CAREGIVER; COMMUNITY BASED REHABILITATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EMOTION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HOME FOR THE AGED; HUMAN; MALE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; WELLBEING;

EID: 78651288688     PISSN: 02699052     EISSN: 1362301X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2010.541403     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Lanno E, Larmuseau D, Van Hoorde W, Eyssen M. Prevalence of young adults with acquired brain injury (ABI) in nursing homes in Belgium: Aged care facilities are not the best option. Brain Injury 2008;22(1):49.
2. McMillan TM, Laurie M. Young adults with acquired brain injury in nursing homes in Glasgow. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004;18:132-138.
3. Soulsby G. Returning to the community-issues in placing people with complex care needs following brain injury in their own homes. Brain Injury 2008;22(1):155-156.
4. Winkler D, Farnworth L, Sloan S. People under 60 living in aged care facilities in Victoria. Australian Health Review 2006;30:100-108.
5. Abello D, Muir K. Quality of life' outcomes reporting for younger people with disabilities in residential aged care; draft final report. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre; 2008.
6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Table at 30 June 2006 by state/territory and age group. Adelaide, SA: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2007.
7. Winkler D, Sloan S, Callaway L. Younger people in residential aged care: Support needs, preferences and future directions. Melbourne, Victoria: Summer Foundation Limited; 2007.
8. Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Report of study to review levels of services and responses in need in a sample of Ontario long term care facilities and select comparators. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Health and Long Term Care; 2005.
9. Australian Government Department of Families Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Younger people with disability in residential aged care program. Available online at: http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/sa/disability/progserv/ people/ypdracp/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 29 January 2010.
10. Department of Human Services. Acquired brain injury strategic plan. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Human Services; 2001.
11. Papastrat LA. Outcome and value following brain injury: A financial provider's perspective. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992;7:11-23.
12. State of Victoria. Intellectually Disabled Persons' Services Act 1986. Act No. 53/1986; 1986.
13. State of Victoria. Disability Services Act 1991. Act No. 80/1991; 1991.
14. State of Victoria. Disability Act 2006. Act No. 23/2006; 2006.
15. Aged Care Price Review Taskforce. Review of pricing arrangements in residential aged care-Full report. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth Department of Health & Ageing; 2004.
16. Stringer K. Study into the accommodation needs for young people requiring nursing home level of care. Melbourne, Victoria: Melbourne City Mission; 1999.
17. Strettles B, Bush M, Simpson G, Gillet L. Accommodation in NSW for adults with high care needs after traumatic brain injury. Sydney, NSW: Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, Liverpool Health Service; 2005.
18. Senate Community Affairs References Committee. Community Affairs References Committee: Quality and equity in aged care. Canberra ACT: The Senate; 2005.
19. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Residential aged care in Australia 2004-05: A statistical overview. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2006. Report nr AIHW Cat. No. AGE 43.
20. Cameron C, Pirozzo S, Tooth L. Long-term care of people below age 65 with severe acquired brain injury: Appropriateness of aged care facilities. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2001;25:261-264.
21. Moylan M, Dey P, McAlpine E. A national research project examining the placement of younger people with a disability in nursing homes for the aged: Data supplement. Sydney, NSW: NSW Department of Community Services; 1995.
22. Australian Government Department of Families Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Younger people with disability in residential aged care program. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Families Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs; 2008.
23. Shorten B. Speech: Bill Shorten MP, Parliamentary Secretary for Disabilities and Children's Services. Shaping the Future Today. Moonee Valley Racing Club Convention Centre, Melbourne; 2008.
24. Gallop J. Board of Inquiry into Disability Services: Final report part 1. Canberra: Disability ACT; 2001.
25. Department of Human Services. Creating new opportunities: Responding to the needs of younger people in Victoria's residential Aged Care Services. Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Human Services; 2005.
26. Regnier V, Denton A. Ten new and emerging trends in residential group environments. NeuroRehabilitation 2009;15:169-188.
27. Roberts K, Taykor B. Nursing research processes: An Australian perspective. Melbourne, Victoria: Nelson; 1998.
28. Glaser B, Strauss A. Awareness of dying. London: Weidebnfeld and Nicolson; 1965.
29. Richards L. Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London, UK: Sage Publications Pty Ltd; 2005.
30. Schofield M. Sampling in quantitative research. In: Minichiello V, Sullivan G, Greenwood K, Axford R, editors. Research methods for nursing and health science. 2nd ed. Sydney, NSW: Pearson Education Australia; 2004.
31. Sloan S. Acquired brain injury slow to recover program. Report of the Therapy Review Program. Melbourne, Victoria: Osborn Sloan & Associates Pty Ltd; 2008.
32. Transport Accident Commission. Transport Accident Commission. Melbourne, Victoria: Transport Accident Commission. Available online at: http://www.tac.vic.gov.au, accessed 29 January 2010.
33. Paterson B, Scott-Findlay S. Critical issues in interviewing people with traumatic brain injury. Qualitative Health Research 2002;12:399-409.
34. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo 2.0.: Melbourne, Victoria: International Pty Ltd; 2002.
35. Chua K, Chuo A, Kong KH. Urinary incontinence after traumatic brain injury: Incidence, outcomes and correlates. Brain Injury 2003;17:469-478.
36. Foxx-Orenstein A, Kolakowsky-Hayner S, Marwitz JH, Cify DX, Dunbar A, Englander J, Francisco G. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of fecal incontinence after acute brain injury: Findings from the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems national database. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003;84:231-237.
37. Continence Foundation of Australia. Funding Schemes for continence products. Available online at: http://www.continence.org.au/client-images/ 801897.pdf, accessed 8 November 2009.
38. Shimada H, Tiedemann A, Lord SR, Suzuki T. Falls: The effect of enhanced supervision on fall rates in residential aged care. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2009;88:823-828.
39. Barreca S, Velikonja D, Brown L, Williams L, Davis L, Sigouin C. Evaluation of the effectiveness of two clinical training procedures to elicit yes/no reponses from patients with severe acquired brain injury: A randomized single-subject design. Brain Injury 2003;17:1065-1075.
40. Yates PJ. Psychological adjustment, social enablement and community integration following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2003;13:291-306.
41. Chou S, Boldy DP, Lee AH. Factors influencing residents' satisfaction in residential aged care. Gerontologist 2003;43: 459-472.
42. Mason T. Scatolia: Psychosis to protest. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2008;3:303-311.
43. Kelly G, Winkler D. Long-term accomodation and support for people with higher levels of challenging behaviour. Brain Impairment 2007;8:262-275.
44. VicHealth. Social inclusion as a determinant of mental health and wellbeing. Melbourne, Victoria: VicHealth; 2005.
45. Winkler D, Unsworth C, Sloan S. Factors that lead to successful community integration following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006;21:8-21.
46. Social Inclusion Unit. The Australian public service social inclusion policy design and delivery toolkit. In: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, editor. Canberra: Blue Star; 2009.
47. McKnight J. The careless society: Community and its counterfeits. New York: Basic Books; 1995.
48. Callaway L, Sloan S, Winkler D. Maintaining and developing friendships following severe traumatic brain injury: Principles of occupational therapy practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 2005;52:262-263.
49. Tate RL. Long-term outcomes and support needs after traumatic brain injury: A 20-26 year perspective. In: Contole J, editor. From hospital to . . . Where? Melbourne, Victoria: Victorian Brain Injury Recovery Association Inc; 2003. pp. 12-18.
50. Burleigh SA, Farber RS, Gillard M. Community integration and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury: Long-term findings. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998;52:45-52.
51. Eames P, Cotterill G, Kneale TA, Storrar AL, Yeomans P. Outcome of intensive rehabilitation after severe brain injury: A long-term follow-up study. Brain Injury 1996;10: 631-650.
52. Olver J, Ponsford JL, Curren CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain injury 1996;10:841-848.
53. World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2001.
54. ACIL Tasman. Efficient workforce structures in the Australian aged care sector. Melbourne, Victoria: ACIL Tasman Pty Ltd; 2003.
55. Martin B, King D. Who cares for older Australians? A picture of the residential and community based aged care workforce 2007. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2008.
56. Goffman E. Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental inpatients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday; 1961.
57. Sloan S, Winkler D, Anson K. Long-term outcome following traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment 2007;8:251-261.
58. Jones G, Lawn R. The young people in nursing homes project: The efficiency and effectiveness of project management structures. Perth, WA: E-QUAL; 1999.
59. Jones G, Lawn R. The young people in nursing homes project evaluation: The history of the YPINH Project from 1995 to 1997. Perth, WA: Disability Services Commission of Western Australia; 1999.
60. Jones G, Lawn R. The young people in nursing homes project evaluation: Evaluation of the individual planning process. Perth, WA: Disability Services Commission of Western Australia; 1999.
61. ACT Government Department of Disability Housing and Community Services. Acquired brain injury project research paper. Canberra, ACT: ACT Government Department of Disability Housing and Community Services; 2006.
62. Fyffe C, McCubbery J, Honey K. Young people with ABI less than 65 years requiring nursing home level of care. Melbourne. Victoria: Grimwood Pty Ltd; 2003.
63. Sloan S, Callaway L, Winkler D, McKinley K, Ziino C, Anson K. The community approach to participation: Outcomes following acquired brain injury intervention. Brain Impairment 2009;10:282-294.
64. Sloan S, Callaway L, Winkler D, McKinley K, Ziino C, Anson K. Changes in care and support needs following community-based intervention for individuals with acquired brain injury. Brain Impairment 2009;10:295-306.
65. UDS Data Management Service. Guide for use of the Uniform Data Set for medical rehabilitation including the Functional Independence Measure (version 3.1). Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1990.
66. Tate RL. Assessing support needs for people with traumatic brain injury: The care and needs scale (CANS). Brain Injury 2004;18:445-460.
67. Fleminger S, Leigh E, Eames P, Langrell L, Nagraj R, Logsdail S. HoNOS-ABI: A reliable outcome measure of neuropsychiatric sequelae to brain injury? Psychiatric Bulletin 2005;29:53-55.
68. Kelly G, Todd J, Simpson G, Kremer P, Martin C. The Overt Behaviour Scale (OBS): A tool for measuring challenging behaviours following ABI in community settings. Brain Injury 2006;20:307-319.
69. Oakley F, Kielhofner G, Barris R, Reichler RK. The Role Checklist: Development and empirical assessment of reliability. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1986;6: 157-170.
70. Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer J, Gordon W, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for TBI. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993;8: 11-23.
71. Sloan S, Winkler D, Callaway L. Community integration following severe traumatic brain injury: Outcomes and best practice. Brain Impairment 2004;5:12-29.
72. Winkler D, Sloan S, Callaway L, Truscott C. Younger people in residential aged care in Tasmania: Characteristics, support needs and preferences. Melbourne: Summer Foundation Limited; 2008.
73. Cummins RA, Lau ALD. Personal Wellbeing Index-Intellectual Disability (English). 3rd ed. Manual. Melbourne: Deakin University; 2005.
74. Cummins RA. Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale-Intellectual/Cognitive Disability, 5th ed. (ComQol-I5). Melbourne: Deakin University; 1997.
75. McColl MA, Davies D, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P. The community integration measure: Development and preliminary validation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;82:429-434.
76. Felce D. Quality of support for ordinary living. In: Mansell J, Ericsson K, editors. Deinstitutionalisation and community living. London: Chapman and Hall; 1996. pp 81-96.
77. Mansell J, Ericsson K. Conclusion: Integration diverse experience. In: Mansell J, Ericsson K, editors. Deinstitutionalisation and community living. London: Chapman and Hall; 1996. pp 242-253.
78. Ball K. We don't live in our homes, we live in our carers' workplace. Link Magazine 2001;10:14.