Classifying sentiment in microblogs: Is brevity an advantage?

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1833-1836

  Bermingham, Adam ^a   Smeaton, Alan ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Experimentation

Indexed keywords

DOCUMENT LENGTH; DOCUMENT REPRESENTATION; EXPERIMENTATION; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SHORT LENGTHS; STANDARD MACHINES;

ALGORITHMS; DATA MINING;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 78651286606     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1871437.1871741     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. S. Agarwal, S. Godbole, D. Punjani, and S. Roy. How much noise is too much: A study in automatic text classification. In ICDM, pages 3-12, 2007.
2. J. Bollen, A. Pepe, and H. Mao. Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. CoRR, abs/0911.1583, 2009.
3. P. Carvalho, L. Sarmento, M. J. Silva, and E. de Oliveira. Clues for detecting irony in user-generated contents: oh⋯!! it's "so easy"; -). In TSA '09: Proceeding of the 1st international CIKM workshop on Topic-sentiment analysis for mass opinion, pages 53-56, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
4. M. Choudhury, R. Saraf, V. Jain, A. Mukherjee, S. Sarkar, and A. Basu. Investigation and modeling of the structure of texting language. IJDAR, 10(3-4): 157-174, 2007.
5. N. A. Diakopoulos and D. A. Shamma. Characterizing debate performance via aggregated Twitter sentiment. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010), 2010.
6. A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani. Sentiwordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-06), pages 417-422, 2006.
7. M. Gamon. Sentiment classification on customer feedback data: noisy data, large feature vectors, and the role of linguistic analysis. In COLING '04: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics, page 841, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2004. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. C. MacDonald and I. Ounis. The TREC Blogs06 collection: Creating and analysing a blog test collection. Technical report, University of Glasgow, Department of Computing Science, 2006.
9. S. Matsumoto, H. Takamura, and M. Okumura. Sentiment classification using word sub-sequences and dependency sub-trees. In Proceedings of PAKDD'05, the 9th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2005.
10. N. O'Hare, M. Davy, A. Bermingham, P. Ferguson, P. Sheridan, C. Gurrin, and A. F. Smeaton. Topic-dependent sentiment analysis of financial blogs. In In: TSA 2009 - 1st International CIKM Workshop on Topic-Sentiment Analysis for Mass Opinion Measurement, Hong Kong, China, 6 Nov 2009.
11. B. Pang and L. Lee. A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In ACL '04: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, page 271, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2004. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundation and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2): 1-135, 2008.
13. S. A. Tagliamonte and D. Denis. LINGUISTIC RUIN? LOL! INSTANT MESSAGING AND TEEN LANGUAGE. American Speech, 83(1): 3-34, 2008.
14. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 347-354, 2005.