Integrated bilevel model to explore interaction between land use allocation and transportation

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2176, 2010, Pages 14-25

  Zhao, Liyuan ^a,b   Peng, Zhong Ren ^b,c  

^a SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATA; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; LAND USE; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

ALLOCATION STRATEGY; BI-LEVEL MODELS; LAND ALLOCATION; LAND USE ALLOCATION; LANDUSE CHANGE; LEVEL MODEL; LOCATION CHOICE; SYSTEM COSTS; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAVEL COSTS;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 78651276561     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2176-02     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Waddell, P. Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2002, pp. 297-314.
2. Badoe, D. A., and E. J. Miller. Transportation-Land-Use Interaction: Empirical Findings in North America, and Their Implications for Modeling. Transportation Research D, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2000, pp. 235-263.
3. Webster, F. V., P. H. Bly, and N. J. Paulley. Urban Land-Use and Transport Interaction. Avebury, United Kingdom, 1994.
4. Boarnet, M., and R. Crane. The Influence of Land Use on Travel Behavior: Specification and Estimation Strategies. Transportation Research A, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2001, pp. 823-845.
5. Kitamura, R., E. I. Pas, C. V. Lula, T. K. Lawton, and P. E. Benson. The Sequenced Activity Mobility Simulator (SAMS): An Integrated Approach to Modeling Transportation, Land Use and Air Quality. Transportation, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1996, pp. 267-291.
6. Waddell, P., and G. F. Ulfarsson. Introduction to Urban Simulation: Design and Development of Operational Models. In Handbooks in Transport, Vol. 5. Transport Geography and Spatial Systems (P. Stopher, K. J. Button, K. E. Haynes, and D. A. Hensher, eds.), Elsevier Science, Maryland Heights, Mo., 2004, pp. 203-236.
7. Chang, J. S., and R. L. Mackett. A Bi-Level Model of the Relationship Between Transport and Residential Location. Transportation Research B, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2006, pp. 123-146.
8. Shaw, S. L., and X. Xin. Integrated Land Use and Transportation Interaction: A Temporal GIS Exploratory Data Analysis Approach. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2003, pp. 103-115.
9. Bone, C., and S. Dragicevic. Sensitivity of a Fuzzy-Constrained Cellular Automata Model of Forest Insect Infestation. Citeseer, 1964.
10. Batty, M., Y. Xie, and Z. Sun. Modeling Urban Dynamics Through GISBased Cellular Automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1999, pp. 205-233.
11. Li, X., and A. G. Yeh. Modelling Sustainable Urban Development by the Integration of Constrained Cellular Automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2000, pp. 131-152.
12. Dieleman, F. M., M. Dijst, and G. Burghouwt. Urban Form and Travel Behaviour: Micro-Level Household Attributes and Residential Context. Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2002, pp. 507-527.
13. Waddell, P., A. Borning, M. Noth, N. Freier, M. Becke, and G. Ulfarsson. Microsimulation of Urban Development and Location Choices: Design and Implementation of Urbanism. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2003, pp. 43-67.
14. Lipscomb, C., and M. Farmer. Household Diversity and Market Segmentation Within a Single Neighborhood. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2005, pp. 791-810.
15. White, R., and G. Engelen. Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: A Cellular Modelling Approach to the Evolution of Urban Land-Use Patterns. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 25, 1993, pp. 1175-1193.
16. Ulam, S. Random Processes and Transformations. Proc., 1950 International Congress on Mathematics, No. 2, 1952, pp. 264-275.
17. Wolfram, S., and M. Gad-el-Hak. A New Kind of Science. Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 56, 2003, p. B18.
18. Clarke, K. C., and L. J. Gaydos. Loose-Coupling a Cellular Automaton Model and GIS: Long-Term Urban Growth Prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 12, No. 7, 1998, pp. 699-714.
19. Li, X., and A. G. Yeh. Neural-Network-Based Cellular Automata for Simulating Multiple Land Use Changes Using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2002, pp. 323-343.
20. Torrens, P. M. New Advances in Urban Simulation: Cellular Automata and Multi-Agent Systems as Planning Support Tools. In Planning Support Systems in Practice (S. S. Geertman, ed.), Springer-Verlag, London, 2002.
21. Wheaton, W. C. Bid Rent Approach to Housing Demand. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1977, pp. 200-217.
22. Shieh, Y. N. An Early Use of Bid Rent Functions. Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2003, pp. 791-795.
23. Chang, J. S. Multiclass Bid-Rent Network Equilibrium Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 112-119.
24. Martinez, F. MUSSA: Land Use Model for Santiago City. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 126-134.
25. Martinez, F. J. The Bid-Choice Land-Use Model: An Integrated Economic Framework. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1992, pp. 871-885.
26. Briceño, L., R. Cominetti, C. E. Cortés, and F. Martínez. An Integrated Behavioral Model of Land Use and Transport System: A Hyper-Network Equilibrium Approach. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2008, pp. 201-224.
27. Martinez, F. Access: The Transport-Land Use Economic Link. Transportation Research B, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1995, pp. 457-470.
28. Martínez, F., and R. Henríquez. A Random Bidding and Supply Land Use Equilibrium Model. Transportation Research B, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2007, pp. 632-651.
29. Meyer, M. D., and E. J. Miller. Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision-Oriented Approach. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math, New York, 2001.
30. Sheffi, Y. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1985.
31. Beckman, M., C. B. McGuire, and C. B. Winsten. Studies in the Economics of Transportation. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., 1956.
32. Hamdouch, Y., M. Florian, D. W. Hearn, and S. Lawphongpanich. Congestion Pricing for Multi-Modal Transportation Systems. Transportation Research B, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007, pp. 275-291.
33. Zhang, W. Q., S. Afshar, and T. M. Monro. A Genetic Algorithm Based Approach to Fiber Design for High Coherence and Large Bandwidth Supercontinuum Generation. Optics Express, Vol. 17, No. 21, 2009, pp. 19,311-19,327.
34. Jia, W., L. Y. Jiang, H. P. Li, G. G. Zheng, and X. Y. Li. Genetic Algorithm for Band Gap Optimization Under Light Line in Two-Dimensional Photonic Crystal Slab. Optica Applicata, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2009, pp. 481-488.
35. Ahipasaoglu, S. D., P. Sun, and M. J. Todd. Linear Convergence of a Modified Frank-Wolfe Algorithm for Computing Minimum-Volume Enclosing Ellipsoids. Optimization Methods & Software, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2008, pp. 5-19.
36. Canon, M. D., C. D. Cullum, and P. Wolfe. On Improving Rate of Convergence of Frank-Wolfe Algorithm. Siam Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1968, pp. 470-498.
37. Daganzo, C. F. Queue Spillovers in Transportation Networks with a Route Choice. Transportation Science, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1998, pp. 3-11.
38. Schultz, G. W., and W. G. Allen, Jr. Improved Modeling of Non-Home-Based Trips. In Transportation Research Record 1556, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 22-26.