Ranking related entities: Components and analyses

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1079-1088

  Bron, Marc ^a   Balog, Krisztian ^a   De Rijke, Maarten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Entity search; Language modeling; Wikipedia

Indexed keywords

CO-OCCURRENCE; CO-OCCURRENCE STATISTICS; CONTEXT MODELING; CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION; END-TO-END TASK; ENTITY SEARCH; EXTERNAL LINKS; FOUR-CORE; HOME PAGE; LANGUAGE MODEL; LANGUAGE MODELING; STATE-OF-THE-ART PERFORMANCE; WIKIPEDIA;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 78651276061     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1871437.1871574     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. K. Balog, L. Azzopardi, and M. de Rijke. Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora. In SIGIR '06, pages 43-50, 2006.
2. K. Balog, L. Azzopardi, and M. de Rijke. A language modeling framework for expert finding. Inf. Proc. and Man., 45(1):1-19, 2009.
3. K. Balog, A. P. de Vries, P. Serdyukov, P. Thomas, and T. Westerveld. Overview of the TREC 2009 entity track. In TREC '09, 2009.
4. Y. Cao, J. Liu, S. Bao, and H. Li. Research on expert search at enterprise track of TREC 2005. In TREC 2005, 2005.
5. ClueWeb09. The ClueWeb09 dataset, 2009. URL: http://boston.lti.cs.cmu. edu/Data/clueweb09/.
6. N. Craswell and D. Hawking. Overview of the TREC-2002 Web Track. In TREC '02, pages 86-95, 2002.
7. N. Craswell, A. P. de Vries, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the TREC 2005 Enterprise Track. In TREC '05, 2005.
8. N. Craswell, G. Demartini, J. Gaugaz, and T. Iofciu. L3S at INEX2008. In Geva et al. [14], pages 253-263.
9. A. de Vries et al. Overview of the INEX 2007 Entity Ranking Track. In Fuhr et al. [13], pages 245-251.
10. T. Dunning. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Comp. Ling., 19(1):61-74, 1993.
11. H. Fang and C. Zhai. Probabilistic models for expert finding. In ECIR 2007, pages 418-430, 2007.
12. Y. Fang et al. Entity retrieval with hierarchical relevance model. In TREC '09, 2009.
13. N. Fuhr, J. Kamps, M. Lalmas, and A. Trotman, editors. Focused access to XML documents: INEX 2007. Springer, 2008.
14. S. Geva, J. Kamps, and A. Trotman, editors. Advances in Focused Retrieval: INEX 2008. Springer, 2009.
15. T. Hasegawa, S. Sekine, and R. Grishman. Discovering relations among named entities from large corpora. In ACL '04, 2004.
16. M. A. Hearst. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Comp. Ling. '92, pages 539-545, 1992.
17. J. Jiang et al. Adapting language modeling methods for expert search to rank Wikipedia entities. In Geva et al. [14], pages 264-272.
18. Y. Jing and W. B. Croft. An association thesaurus for information retrieval. In RIAO '94, pages 146-160, 1994.
19. R. Kaptein, M. Koolen, and J. Kamps. Result diversity and entity ranking experiments. In TREC '09, 2009.
20. J. Lafferty and C. Zhai. Document language models, query models, and risk minimization for information retrieval. In SIGIR '01, 2001.
21. C. D. Manning and H. Schuetze. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. The MIT Press, 1999.
22. M. McCreadie, C. Macdonald, I. Ounis, J. Peng, and R. L. T. Santos. University of Glasgow at TREC 2009. In TREC '09, 2009.
23. P. Ogilvie and J. P. Callan. Combining document representations for known-item search. In SIGIR '03, pages 143-150, 2003.
24. J. Pamarthi, G. Zhou, and C. Bayrak. A journey in entity related retrieval for TREC 2009. In TREC '09, 2009.
25. D. Petkova and W. B. Croft. Proximity-based document representation for named entity retrieval. In CIKM '07, pages 731-740, 2007.
26. H. Raghavan, J. Allan, and A. Mccallum. An exploration of entity models, collective classification and relation description. In LinkKDD '04, 2004.
27. D. Ravichandran and E. H. Hovy. Learning surface text patterns for a question answering system. In ACL '02, pages 41-47, 2002.
28. E. Riloff. Automatically generating extraction patterns from untagged text. In AAAI, Vol. 2, pages 1044-1049, 1996.
29. S. Schlobach, M. Olsthoorn, and M. de Rijke. Type checking in open-domain question answering. In ECAI '04, 2004.
30. P. Serdyukov and A. de Vries. Delft university at the TREC 2009 Entity Track: Ranking wikipedia entities. In TREC '09, 2009.
31. F. Song and W. B. Croft. A general language model for information retrieval. In CIKM '99, pages 316-321, 1999.
32. T. Tsikrika et al. Structured document retrieval, multimedia retrieval, and entity ranking using PF/Tijah. In Fuhr et al. [13], pages 306-320.
33. A.-M. Vercoustre, J. Pehcevski, and J. A. Thom. Using Wikipedia categories and links in entity ranking. In Fuhr et al. [13].
34. E. M. Voorhees. Overview of the TREC 2002 Question Answering Track. In TREC '02, pages 115-123, 2002.
35. E. M. Voorhees. The TREC-8 question answering track report. In TREC '99, pages 77-82, 1999.
36. E. M. Voorhees and C. Buckley. The effect of topic set size on retrieval experiment error. In SIGIR '02, pages 316-323, 2002.
37. V. G. V. Vydiswaran, K. Ganesan, Y. Lv, J. He, and C. Zhai. Finding related entities by retrieving relations. In TREC '09, 2009.
38. Z. Wang, D. Liu, W. Xu, G. Chen, and J. Guo. BUPT at TREC 2009: Entity Track. In TREC '09, 2009.
39. W. Weerkamp, J. He, K. Balog, and E. Meij. A generative language modeling approach for ranking entities. In Geva et al. [14].
40. Y. Wu and H. Kashioka. NiCT at TREC 2009: Employing three models for Entity Ranking Track. In TREC '09, 2009.
41. J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis. ACM TOIS, 18:79-112, 2000.
42. Q. Yang, P. Jiang, C. Zhang, and Z. Niu. Experiments on related entity finding track at TREC 2009. In TREC '09, 2009.
43. H. Zhai, X. Cheng, J. Guo, H. Xu, and Y. Liu. A novel framework for related entities finding: ICTNet at TREC 2009. In TREC '09, 2009.
44. W. Zheng, S. Gottipati, J. Jiang, and H. Fang. UDEL/SMU at TREC 2009 Entity Track. In TREC '09, 2009.
45. J. Zhu, D. Song, and S. Rüger. Integrating document features for entity ranking. In Fuhr et al. [13], pages 336-347.