Near set evaluation and recognition (Near) system

Rough Fuzzy Image Analysis: Foundations and Methodologies

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 7-1-7-22

  Henry, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651275961     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781439803301     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Bartol, W., J. Miró, K. Pióro, and F. Rosselló. 2004. On the coverings by tolerance classes. Information Sciences 166(1-4):193-211.
2. Christoudias, C., B. Georgescu, and P. Meer. 2002. Synergism in low level vision. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on pattern recognition, vol. 4, 150-156. Quebec City.
3. 2norm lenght-based image similarity measures: Concrescence of image feature histogram distances 178-185.
4. Gerasin, S. N., V. V. Shlyakhov, and S. V. Yakovlev. 2008. Set coverings and tolerance relations. Cybernetics and System Analysis 44(3):333-340.
5. Gupta, S., and K. Patnaik. 2008. Enhancing performance of face recognition systems by using near set approach for selecting facial features. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 4(5):433-441.
6. Hassanien, A. E., A. Abraham, J. F. Peters, G. Schaefer, and C. Henry. 2009. Rough sets and near sets in medical imaging: A review. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 13(6):955-968. Digital object identifier: 10.1109/TITB.2009.2017017.
7. Henry, C., and J. F. Peters. 2007. Image pattern recognition using approximation spaces and near sets. In Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on rough sets, fuzzy sets, data mining and granular computer (rsfdgrc 2007), joint rough set symposium (jrs07), lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol. 4482, 475-482.
8. Henry, C., and J. F. Peters. 2008. Near set index in an objective image segmentation evaluation framework. In Proceedings of the geographic object based image analysis: Pixels, objects, intelligence, to appear. University of Calgary, Alberta.
9. Henry, C., and J. F. Peters. 2009a. Near set evaluation and recognition (near) system. Tech. Rep., Computational Intelligence Laboratory, University of Manitoba. UM CI Laboratory Technical Report No. TR-2009-015.
10. Henry, C., and J. F. Peters. 2009b. Perception based image classification. Tech. Rep., Computational Intelligence Laboratory, University of Manitoba. UM CI Laboratory Technical Report No. TR-2009-016.
11. Henry, C., and J. F. Peters. 2009c. Perceptual image analysis. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation 2(2):to appear.
12. Henry, C., and J.F. Peters. 2009d. Near sets. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near sets.
13. Magick++. 2009. Imagemagick image-processing library. www.imagemagick.org.
14. Mallat, S., and S. Zhong. 1992. Characterization of signals from multiscale edges. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14(7):710-732.
15. Marti, J., J. Freixenet, J. Batlle, and A. Casals. 2001. A new approach to outdoor scene description based on learning and top-down segmentation. Image and Vision Computing 19:1041-1055.
16. Martin, D., C. Fowlkes, D. Tal, and J. Malik. 2001. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on computer visison, vol. 2, 416-423.
17. Meghdadi, A. H., J. F. Peters, and S. Ramanna. 2009. Tolerance classes in measuring image resemblance. Intelligent Analysis of Images & Videos, KES 2009, Part 2, Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, LNAI 5712 127-134. ISBN 978-3-64-04591-2, doi 10.1007/978-3-642-04592-9 16.
18. Orlowska, E. 1982. Semantics of vague concepts. applications of rough sets. Tech. Rep. 469, Institute for Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences.
19. Orlowska, E. 1985. Semantics of vague concepts. In Foundations of logic and linguistics. problems and solutions, ed. G. Dorn and P. Weingartner, 465-482. London/NY: Plenum Pres.
20. Pal, N. R., and S. K. Pal. 1991. Entropy: A new definition and its applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 21(5):1260-1270.
21. Pal, N. R., and S. K. Pal. 1992. Some properties of the exponential entropy. Information Sciences 66: 119-137.
22. Pavel, M. 1983. “shape theory” and pattern recognition. Pattern Recognition 16(3): 349-356.
23. Pawlak, Z. 1981. Classification of objects by means of attributes. Tech. Rep. PAS 429, Institute for Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences.
24. Pawlak, Z. 1982. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11:341-356.
25. Pawlak, Z., and A. Skowron. 2007a. Rough sets and boolean reasoning. Information Sciences 177:41-73.
26. Pawlak, Z., and A. Skowron. 2007b. Rough sets: Some extensions. Information Sciences 177:28-40.
27. Pawlak, Z., and A. Skowron. 2007c. Rudiments of rough sets. Information Sciences 177:3-27.
28. Peters, J. F. 2007a. Classification of objects by means of features. In Proceedings of the ieee symposium series on foundations of computational intelligence (ieee scci 2007), 1-8. Honolulu, Hawaii.
29. Peters, J. F. 2007b. Near sets. general theory about nearness of objects. Applied Mathe-matical Sciences 1(53):2609-2629.
30. Peters, J. F. 2007c. Near sets. special theory about nearness of objects. Fundamenta Infor-maticae 75(1-4):407-433.
31. Peters, J. F. 2008. Classification of perceptual objects by means of features. International Journal of Information Technology & Intelligent Computing 3(2):1-35.
32. Peters, J. F. 2009a. Computational intelligence laboratory. http://wren.ece.umanitoba.ca/.
33. Peters, J. F. 2009b. Discovery of perceptually near information granules. In Novel devel-opements in granular computing: Applications of advanced human reasoning and soft computation, ed. J. T. Yao, in press. Hersey, N.Y., USA: Information Science Reference.
34. Peters, J. F. 2009c. Tolerance near sets and image correspondence. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation 1(4):239-245.
35. Peters, J. F. 2010. Corrigenda and addenda: Tolerance near sets and image correspondence. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation 2(5). in press.
36. Peters, J. F., and S. Ramanna. 2007. Feature selection: A near set approach. In Ecml & pkdd workshop in mining complex data, 1-12. Warsaw.
37. Peters, J. F. 2009. Affinities between perceptual granules: Foundations and perspectives. In Human-centric information processing through granular modelling, ed. A. Bargiela and W. Pedrycz, 49-66. Berline: Springer-Verlag.
38. Peters, J. F., S. Shahfar, S. Ramanna, and T. Szturm. 2007a. Biologically-inspired adaptive learning: A near set approach. In Frontiers in the convergence of bioscience and information technologies. Korea.
39. Peters, J. F., A. Skowron, and J. Stepaniuk. 2006. Nearness in approximation spaces. In Proc. concurrency, specification & programming, 435-445. Humboldt Universität.
40. Peters, J. F., A. Skowron, and J. Stepaniuk. 2007b. Nearness of objects: Extension of approximation space model. Funda-menta Informaticae 79(3-4):497-512.
41. Peters, J. F., and P. Wasilewski. 2009. Foundations of near sets. Information Sciences. An International Journal 179:3091-3109. Digital object identifier: doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.04.018.
42. Peters, J. F., and P. Wasilewski. 2010. Tolerance space view of what we see. poincaré’s physical continuum and zeeman’s visual perception. Mathematical Intelligencer, submitted.
43. Peters, J.F., and L. Puzio. 2009. Image analysis with anisotropic wavelet-based nearness measures. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 3(2): 1-17.
44. Poincaré, H. 1913. Mathematics and science: Last essays, trans. by j. w. bolduc. N. Y.: Kessinger.
45. Schroeder, M., and M. Wright. 1992. Tolerance and weak tolerance relations. Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing 11:123-160.
46. Seemann, T. 2002. Digital image processing using local segmentation. Ph.d. dissertation, School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Monash University.
47. Shreider, Yu. A. 1970. Tolerance spaces. Cybernetics and System Analysis 6(12): 153-758.
48. Skowron, A., and J. Stepaniuk. 1996. Tolerance approximation spaces. Fundamenta Informaticae 27(2-3):245-253.
49. Sossinsky 1986. 1986. Tolerance space theory and some applications. Acta Applican-dae Mathematicae: An International Survey Journal on Applying Mathematics and Mathematical Applications 5(2):137-167.
50. Weber, M. 1999. Leaves dataset. Url: www.vision.caltech.edu/archive.html.wx
51. Widgets. 2009. wxwidgets cross-platform gui library v2.8.9. www.wxwidgets.org.
52. Zeeman, E. C. 1962. The topology of the brain and the visual perception. In Topoloy of 3-manifolds and selected topices, ed. K. M. Fort, 240-256. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
53. Zheng, Z., H. Hu, and Z. Shi. 2005. Tolerance relation based granular space. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3641:682-691.