Assessing alternative approaches to setting parking requirements

ITE Journal (Institute of Transportation Engineers)

Volumn 80, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 30-34

  Engel Yan, Joshua ^a,b,c   Passmore, Dylan ^a  

^a Policy and Planing Divison   (Canada)

^b IBI Group ^*

^c IBI Group   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH; CONTEXT SENSITIVITY; LONG TERM PLANNING; PARKING RATIOS;

STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 78651273465     PISSN: 01628178     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hess, D.B. Effect of Free Parking on Commuter Mode Choice: Evidence from Travel Diary Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 1753, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001, pp. 35-42.
2. Shiftan, Y. and A. Golani. Effect of Auto Restraint Policies on Travel Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 1932, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2005, pp. 156-163.
3. Peng, Z., Dueker, K.J., and J.G. Strathman. Residential Location, Employment Location, and Commuter Responses to Parking Charges. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 1556, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 109-118.
4. Shoup, DC An Opportunity to Reduce Minimum Parking Requirements. Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol. 61, No. 1, 1995, pp. 14-28.
5. Shoup, DC The High Cost of Free Parking. American Planning Association, Chicago, IL, 2005.
6. Litman, T. Parking Management Best Practices. American Planning Association, Chicago, IL, 2006.
7. Jia, W. and M. Wachs. Parking Requirements and Housing Affordability: Case Study of San Francisco. In Transportation Research RecordJournal of the Transportation Research Board No. 1685, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1999, pp. 156-160.
8. Mukhija,V.andShoup,D."QuantityversusQualityinOff- StreetParkingRequirements."JournaloftheAmericanPlanningAssociation,Vol.72, No.3(Summer2006):296-308.(Pubitemid44509209)
9. Urban Land Institute and the National Parking Association. The Dimensions of Parking 4th Edition. Washington, DC, USA: Urban Land Institute, 2000.
10. IBI Group. Review of the City of Toronto Zoning By-law Parking Standards for Office, Retail and Restaurant Uses. City of Toronto, Ontario, March 2007. http://www.toronto.ca/zoning/parking1.htm. Accessed August 9, 2010.
11. Engel-Yan, J., Hollingworth, B., Anderson, S. Will Reducing Parking Standards Lead to Reductions in Parking Supply? Results of an Extensive Commercial Parking Survey in Toronto, Canada. In Transportation Research RecordJournal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2010, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2007, pp. 102-110.
12. Smith, T. Flexible Parking Requirements. PAS 377. APA Planning Advisory Service, 1983.
13. Langdon, P. "Form-Based Codes Reach Critical Mass." New Urban News Vol. 15, No. 6 (April/May 2010).
14. Duany, A., Sorlien, S., and Wright W. SmartCode Version 9.0. The Town Paper, 2007.
15. City of Grass Valley. City of Grass Valley Development Code. Grass Valley, California, October 23, 2007.
16. Hananouchi, R. and Nuworsoo, C. K. Comparison of Parking Requirements in Zoning and Form-Based Codes. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2010/ Paper #10-2818, (2010) 23p.
17. Urban Land Institute and International Council of Shopping Centers. Parking Requirements for Shopping Centers, 2nd Edition. Washington, DC, USA: Urban Land Institute, 2003.
18. BA Group. Parking Strategy for Markham Centre, Appendix A. Markham, Ontario, Canada, 2003.