Modeling reformulation using passage analysis

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1497-1500

  Xue, Xiaobing ^a   Croft, W Bruce ^a   Smith, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Information retrieval; Passage analysis; Query reformulation; Query segmentation; Query substitution

Indexed keywords

PASSAGE ANALYSIS; QUERY REFORMULATION; QUERY SEGMENTATION; QUERY SUBSTITUTION; RELEVANT DOCUMENTS; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS; TREC COLLECTION;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; QUERY PROCESSING;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 78651272966     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1871437.1871656     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. M. Bendersky, D. A. Smith, and W. B. Croft. Two-stage query segmentation for information retrieval. In SIGIR09, pages 810-811, Boston, MA, 2009.
2. S. Bergsma and Q. I. Wang. Learning noun phrase query segmentation. In EMNLP-CoNLL07, pages 819-826, Prague, 2007.
3. G. Cao, J. Y. Nie, J. Gao, and S. Robertson. Selecting good expansion terms for pseudo-relevance feedback. In SIGIR08, pages 243-250, Singapore, 2008.
4. V. Dang and W. B. Croft. Query reformulation using anchor text. In WSDM10, New York, NY, 2010.
5. J. Guo, G. Xu, H. Li, and X. Cheng. A unified and discriminative model for query refinement. In SIGIR08, pages 379-386, Singapore, 2008.
6. R. Jones, B. Rey, O. Madani, and W. Greiner. Generating query substitutions. In WWW06, pages 387-396, Ediburgh, Scotland, 2006.
7. V. Lavrenko and W. B. Croft. Relevance based language models. In SIGIR01, pages 120-127, New Orleans, LA, 2001.
8. X. Liu and W. B. Croft. Passage retrieval based on language models. In CIKM02, pages 375-382, McLean, VA, 2002.
9. D. Metzler and W. B. Croft. A markov random field model for term dependencies. In SIGIR05, pages 472-479, Salvador, Brazil, 2005.
10. D. Metzler and W. B. Croft. Latent concept expansion using markov random fields. In SIGIR07, pages 311-318, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2007.
11. G. Mishne and M. de Rijke. Boosting web retrieval through query operations. In ECIR05, pages 502-516, Spain, 2005.
12. F. Peng, N. Ahmed, X. Li, and Y. Lu. Context sensitive stemming for web search. In SIGIR07, pages 639-646, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2007.
13. J. M. Ponte and W. B. Croft. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In SIGIR98, pages 275-281, Melbourne, Australia, 1998.
14. B. Tan and F. Peng. Unsupervised query segmentation using generative language models and Wikipedia. In WWW08, pages 347-356, Beijing, China, 2008.
15. X. Wang and C. Zhai. Mining term association patterns from search logs for effective query reformulation. In CIKM08, pages 479-488, Napa Valley, CA, 2008.
16. J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 18(1):79-112, 2000.
17. X. Xue and W. B. Croft. Representing queries as distributions. In SIGIR10 Workshop on Query Representation and Understanding, pages 9-12, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
18. C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In SIGIR01, pages 334-342, New Orleans, LA, 2001.