Tumor grade improves the prognostic ability of American joint committee on cancer stage in patients with penile carcinoma

Journal of Urology

Volumn 185, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 501-507

  Thuret, Rodolphe ^a,c   Sun, Maxine ^a   Abdollah, Firas ^a,e   Budaus, Lars ^a,f   Lughezzani, Giovanni ^a,e   Liberman, Daniel ^a,b   Morgan, Monica ^a,b   Johal, Rupinder ^a,b   Jeldres, Claudio ^a,b   Latour, Mathieu ^b   Shariat, Shahrokh F ^a   Iborra, Franois ^c   Guiter, Jacques ^c   Patard, Jean Jacques ^d   Perrotte, Paul ^b   Karakiewicz, Pierre I ^a,b  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c MONTPELLIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^e VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

carcinoma, squamous cell; mortality; neoplasm staging; nomograms; penis

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; AMERICAN JOINT COMITTEE ON CANCER STAGE; ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PENIS CANCER; PREDICTION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIMARY TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INCIDENCE; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LYMPH NODES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; NOMOGRAMS; PENILE NEOPLASMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RARE DISEASES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEER PROGRAM; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78651267788     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.111     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, and E. Ward Cancer statistics, 2007 CA Cancer J Clin 57 2007 43
2. S. Misra, A. Chaturvedi, and N.C. Misra Penile carcinoma: a challenge for the developing world Lancet Oncol 5 2004 240
3. B.K. Kroon, S. Horemblas, and O.E. Niewec Contemporary management of penile squamous cell carcinoma J Surg Oncol 89 2005 43
4. M.W. Kattan, V. Ficarra, and W. Artibani Nomogram predictive of cancer specific survival in patients undergoing partial or total amputation for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis J Urol 175 2006 2103
5. L. Zini, V. Cloutier, and H. Isbarn A simple and accurate model for prediction of cancer specific mortality in patients treated with surgery for primary penile squamous cell carcinoma Clin Cancer Res 15 2009 1013
6. L.A. Ries SEER Cancer Statistics Review http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/ 19752004/ Accessed May 2010
7. L.H. Sobin, and C. Wittekind TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours 2002 Wiley-Liss London
8. F.E. Harrell Jr, K.L. Lee, and D.B. Mark Multivariate prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors Stat Med 15 1996 361
9. F.E. Harrell, R.M. Califf, and D.B. Pryor Evaluating the yield of medical tests JAMA 247 1982 2543
10. A.C. Atkinson A note on the generalized information criterion for choice of a model Biometrika 67 1980 413
11. P.M. Grambsch, and T.M. Therneau Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals Biometrika 81 1994 515
12. E.R. DeLong, D.M. DeLong, and D.L. Clarke-Pearson Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristics curves: a nonparametric approach Biometrics 44 1988 837
13. J.P. Fine, and R.J. Gray A proportional hazards model for the substitution of a comparing risk JASA 94 1999 496
14. European Association Urology Guidelines http://www.uroweb.org/nc/ professional-resources/guidelines/online/ Accessed May 2010
15. P.I. Karakiewicz, A. Briganti, and F.K.H. Chun Multi-institutional validation of a new renal cancer-specific survival nomogram J Clin Oncol 25 2007 1316
16. A.A. Ornellas, B.L. Nobrega, and E. Wei Kin Chin Prognostic factors in invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 196 patients treated at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute J Urol 180 2008 1354
17. S.K. Bhagat, G. Gopalakrishnan, and N.S. Kekre Factors predicting inguinal node metastasis in squamous cell cancer of penis World J Urol 28 2010 93
18. A. Lopes, G.S. Hidalgo, and L.P. Kowalski Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy J Urol 156 1996 1637
19. J.R. Daling, M.M. Madeleine, and L.G. Johnson Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease Int J Cancer 116 2005 606
20. C. Nordenvall, E.T. Chang, and H.O. Adami Cancer risk among patients with condylomata acuminata Int J Cancer 119 2006 888