Dissociating between cardinal and ordinal and between the value and size magnitudes of coins

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 889-894

  Fitousi, Daniel ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; TIME;

HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MATHEMATICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIZE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78651260626     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.6.889     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ben Nathan, M., Shaki, S., Salti, M., & Algom, D. (2009). Numbers and space: Associations and dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 578-582.
2. Besner, D., & Coltheart, M. (1979). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English. Neuropsychologia, 17, 467-472.
3. Choplin, J. M., & Logan, G. D. (2005). A memory-based account of automatic numerosity processing. Memory & Cognition, 33, 17-28.
4. Damian, M. F. (2004). Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words. Memory & Cognition, 32, 164-171.
5. Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 626-641.
6. Fias, W., Reynvoet, B., & Brysbaert, M. (2001). Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task? Psychological Research, 65, 242-249.
7. Fitousi, D., & Algom, D. (2006). Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: Expanding the number line? Memory & Cognition, 34, 445-457.
8. Fitousi, D., Shaki, S., & Algom, D. (2009). The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: The SNARC effect revisited. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 143-155.
9. Frege, G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Jena: Hermann Pohle.
10. Moyer, R. S. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 180-184.
11. Moyer, R. S., & Dumais, S. T. (1978). Mental comparison. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 12, pp. 117-155). New York: Academic Press.
12. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
13. Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye. Memory & Cognition, 3, 635-647.
14. Petrusic, W. M. (1992). Semantic congruity effects and theories of the comparison process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 962-986.
15. Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Bihan, D. L., & Dehaene, S. (2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 53, 293-305.
16. Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274-278.
17. Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to mathematical philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin.
18. Shepard, R. N., Kilpatrick, D. W., & Cunningham, J. P. (1975). The internal representation of number. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 82-138.
19. Shoben, E. J., Čech, C. G., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Sailor, K. M. (1989). Serial position effects in comparative judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 273-286.
20. Tzelgov, J., Meyer, J., & Henik, A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 166-179.
21. Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483-488.