Analysis of data using neuro-fuzzy approach recorded by instrumentation network installed at Mansa Devi (Haridwar) landslide site

Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 25-31

  Mittal, S K ^a   Dhingra, Sunil ^b   Sardana, H K ^a  

^a CSIR CENTRAL SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS ORGANISATION   (India)

^b KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Early warning; Instrumentation network; Landslide monitoring; Neural fuzzy technique

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; EARLY WARNING SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; INSTRUMENTATION; LANDSLIDE; RAINGAUGE;

HARIDWAR; INDIA; UTTARAKHAND;

MANSA;

EID: 78651250311     PISSN: 00224456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sarkar S & Kanungo D P, Landslide hazard zonation in India: a review. Geotechnical Engineering for Disaster Mitigation and Rehabilitation. Proc 1st Int Conf, Singapore (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pvt Ltd) 2005.
2. Bartarya S K, Mazari R K & Virdi N S, Bhimgoda slide of August 24, 1994 in the Siwalik Rocks near Haridwar: A Success story of landslide control measures, in Natural Hazards (Indian Geological Congress, Roorkee) 2007, 157-167.
3. GuptaV, Mazari R K & Rautela P, Engineering Geological Characterization of a landslide on the slope of Mansa Devi Hill near Haridwar, Uttarakhand, Nat Hazards (in press).
4. Marinos P & Hoek E, Estimating geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock mass such as flysch, Bull Engg Geol Environ, 60 (2001) 85-92.
5. Mittal S K, Singh M, Sardana H K & Dhingra S, Instrumental monitoring of Mansa Devi Landslide site and interpretation of data, Indian Geotech J, 39 (2009) 317-327.
6. Jackson S, Surveying in a geotechnical environment, in Proc Australian Conf on Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring in open pit and Underground Mining, (A A Balkema, Netherlands) 1993.
7. Hanna T H, Field Instrumentation in Geotechnical Engineering (Trans Tech Publications, Germany) 1985, 63-347, 718-720.
8. Dunnicliff J, Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Field Performance (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York) 1993, 75-327, 443-451.
9. Mittal S K, Singh M, Kapur P, Sharma B K & Shamshi M A, Design and development of instrumentation for landslide monitoring and issue an early warning, J Sci Ind Res, 67 (2008) 361-365.
10. Sweet C R & Matthews A T, Advantages of new data logging systems in the field of instrumentation, in Geotechnical Instrumentation in Civil Engineering (Thomas Telford, London) 1990.
11. Teal D L E, Cordless geo data-link, in Geotechnical Instrumentation in Civil Engineering (Thomas Telford, London) 1990.
12. Muthu K & Petrou M, Landslide possibility mapping using fuzzy approaches, IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Seni, 46 (2008) 1253-1264.
13. Demuth H, Beale M & Hagan M, Neural Network Toolbox 6, User's Guide (The Math Works, USA) 2008
14. Zadeh L A, Fuzzy sets, Inform Control, 8 (1965) 338-353.
15. Buckley J J & Hayashi Y, Fuzzy neural networks, in Fuzzy Sets, Neural Networks and Soft Computing (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York) 1994, 233-249.
16. Pennell R & Ruberu D, Realtime display of landslide monitoring data, http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw05/papers/refereed/pennell/paper.html (Accessed on August 18, 2009).
17. Roger J J S & Gulley N, MATLAB® Fuzzy Logic Toolbox, User's Guide, Version 1 (The Math Works, USA) 1997.
18. Vanwesten C J & Seijmonsbergen A C, Comparing landslide hazard maps, Nat Hazards, 20 (1999) 137-158.
19. Storey B D, Using the MATLAB Data Acquisition Toolbox. URL: http://faculty.olin.edu/bstorey/Notes/Card.pdf (accessed January 2008).
20. Taylor R K & Cripps J C, Weathering effects: slopes in mudrocks and over-consolidated clays, in Slope Stability: Geotechnical Engineering and Geomorphology (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 1987, 405-425.