The Abel Assessment for Sexual Interests - 2: A Critical Review

Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offenders

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 31-57

  Sachsenmaier, Susan J ^a   Gress, Carmen L Z ^b,c  

^a Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Pac Psychol Assessment Corporation   (Canada)

Author keywords

AASI measuring erotic preference; AASI methodology; AASI with adolescents; Abel assessment for sexual interests; Abel Blasingame Assessment System for individuals with intellectual disabilities; Core component of AASI viewing time (VT) measure; Cross validation and replication attempts of AASI VT measure; Statistical adequacy of AASI; Viewing time (VT) with plethysmographic arousal (PPG) in child molesters; VT as measurement of sexual interest

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651087015     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470747551.ch2     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Abel, G. (2000) The importance ofmeeting research standards: a reply to Fischer and Smith's articles on the Abel assessment for sexual interest. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 149-61.
2. Abel, G.G., Huffman, J., Warberg, B.W. and Holland, C.L. (1998) Visual reaction time and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters. Sexual Abuse:AJournal of Research and Treatment, 10, 81-95.
3. Abel, G.G., Jordan, A., Hand, C., Holland, L. and Phipps, A. (2001) Classification models of child molesters utilizing the Abel Assessment for sexual interest. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 703-18.
4. Abel, G.G., Jordan, A., Rouleau, J.L., Emerick, R., Barboza-Whitehead, S. and Osborn, C. (2004) Use of visual reaction time to assess male adolescents who molest children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 255-65.
5. Abel, G.G., Lawry, S.S., Karlstrom, E.M., Osborn, C.A. and Gillespie, C.F. (1994) Screening tests for pedophilia. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 115-31.
6. Abel Screening News (1997, September/October) p. 1, Abel Screening Inc., Suite T-30, West Wing, 3280 Howell Mill Road, N.W., Atlanta, GA 30327.
7. Barboza-Whitehead, S.E. (2001) Discriminant validity of the Abel assessment for sexual interest with juvenileswho admit versus deny their sexual offenses. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 61 (12B), 6697.
8. Bergner, D. (2005) The making of a molester. The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/23/magazine/23PEDO.html?ex=1186977600&en=66c14313bf735778&ei=5070 (retrieved 23 January 2005 and 11 August 2007).
9. Brown, M., Amoroso, D.M., Ware, E.E., Pruesse, M. and Pilkey, D.W. (1973) Factors affecting viewing time of pornography. Journal of Social Psychology, 90, 125-35.
10. Crocker, L. and Algina, J. (1986) Introduction to Classical & Modern Test Theory. Holt, Reinhart and Winston, Inc., Orlando, FL.
11. Fischer, L. (2000) The Abel Screen: A non-intrusive alternative? in Remaking Relapse Prevention with Sex Offenders: A Sourcebook (eds D.R. Laws, S.M. Hudson and T. Ward), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 303-18.
12. Fischer, L. and Morgan, D. (2006) Norm Referenced Clinical Decision-Making with Affinity Viewing-Time. Annualmeeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Chicago, IL.
13. Fischer, L. and Smith, G. (1999) Statistical adequacy of the Abel assessment for interest in Paraphilias. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 195-205.
14. Freund, K. (1957) Diagnostika homosexuality yumuzu [Diagnosing homosexuality inmen]. Czechoslovakian Psychiatry, 53, 382-94.
15. Glasgow, D.V., Osborne, A. and Croxen, J. (2003) An assessment tool for investigating paedophile sexual interest using viewing time: an application of single case methodology. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 96-102.
16. Gray, S. (2000) Outcome of the Abel Assessment with Penile Plethysmograph in a Sample of Sex Offenders in Outpatient Treatment. Annual meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Orlando, FL.
17. Gray, S. and Plaud, J. (2005) A comparison of the Abel Assessment for sexual interest and penile plethysmography in an outpatient sample of sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Offender Civil Commitment: Science and the Law, 1, 1-10, http://www.soccjournal.org/index.cfm?page=http%3A//www.soccjournal.org/jsocc home.cfm (accessed on 7 July 2008).
18. Gress, C.L.Z. (2005) Viewing timemeasures and sexual interest: another piece of the puzzle. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 117-25.
19. Gress, C.L.Z. (2007) Delays in attentional processing when viewing sexual imagery: the development and comparison of two measures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
20. Hanson, R.K. and Bussiére, M.T. (1996) Predictors of Sexual Offender Recidivism: Meta-Analysis, User Report 96-04, Department of the Solicitor General of Canada, http://www.sgc.gc.ca (accessed on 7 July 2008).
21. Hanson, R.K. and Bussiére, M.T. (1998) Predicting relapse, ameta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-62.
22. Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L. and Chaplin, T.C. (1996) Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest among child molesters and normal heterosexual men. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 389-94.
23. Johnson, S. and Listiak, A. (1999) The measurement of sexual preference-a preliminary comparison of phallometry and the Abel assessment, in The Sex Offender: Theoretical Advances, Treating Special Populations and Legal Developments (ed. B. Schwartz), Civic Research Institute, Kingston, NJ.
24. Karpatschof, B. and Elkjær, H.K. (2000) Yet the Bumblebee Flies: The Reliability of Ipsative Scores-Examined by Empirical Data and a Simulation Study. Research Report no. 1. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
25. Lalumière, M.L., Quinsey, V.L., Harris, G., Rice, M. and Trautrimas, C. (2003) Are rapists differentially aroused by coercive sex in phallometric assessments? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 211-24.
26. Lang, A.R., Searles, J., Lauerman, R. and Adesso, V. (1980) Expectancy, alcohol, and sex guilt as determinants of interest in and reaction to sexual stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 644-53.
27. Laws, D.R. and Gress, C.L.Z. (2004) Seeing things differently: the viewing time alternative to penile plethysmography. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 183-96.
28. Laws, D.R., Hanson, R.K., Osborn, C.A. and Greenbaum, P.E. (2000) Classification of child molesters by plethysmographic assessment of sexual arousal and a self-report measure of sexual preference. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1297-1312.
29. Letourneau, E. (1999) A Comparison of the Penile Plethysmograph and the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest on Incarcerated Military Sex Offenders. Annual meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Orlando, FL.
30. Letourneau, E. (2002) A comparison of objective measures of sexual arousal and interest: visual reaction time and penile plethysmography. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 207-23.
31. Love, R.E., Sloan, L.R. and Schmidt, M.J. (1976) Viewing pornography and sex guilt: the priggish, the prudent, and the profligate. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 624-9.
32. Maletzky, B.M. (2003) Letter to the editor. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 393.
33. Mills, J.F., Kroner, D.G. and Hemmati, T. (2007) The validity of risk estimates: an issue of item performance. Psychological Services, 4, 1-12.
34. Poole, D.A. and Lamb, M.E. (1998) Investigative Interviews of Children: A Guide for Helping Professionals, American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
35. Quinsey, V.L., Ketsetzis, M., Earls, C. and Karamanoukian, A. (1996) Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 341-54.
36. Quinsey, V.L., Rice, M.E., Harris, G.T. and Reid, K.S. (1993) The phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of sexual age preference in males: conceptual and measurement issues, in The Juvenile Sex Offender (eds H. Barbaree, W.L. Marshall and S.M. Hudson), Guilford Press, New York, pp. 143-63.
37. Ready v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts (2002) WL 1255800 (Mass. Super. 2002).
38. Rosenzweig, S. (1942) The photoscope as an objective device for evaluating sexual interest. Psychosomatic Medicine, 4, 150-58.
39. Seghorn, T. and Weigel, M. (1999). Comparative Use of the Abel Assessments and Penile Plethysmograph Laboratory Assessments in an Outpatient Forensic Practice. Annual meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Orlando, FL.
40. Singer, B. (1984) Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction. The Journal of Sex Research, 20, 230-40.
41. Smith, G. and Fischer, L. (1999) Assessment of juvenile sexual offenders: reliability and validity of the Abel assessment for interest in Paraphilias. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 207-16.
42. United States v. White Horse, 316 F.3d 769 (8th Cir.) cert. denied 124 S.Ct. 116 (2003).
43. Ware, E.E., Brown, M., Amoroso, D.M., Pilkey, D.W. and Pruesse, M. (1972) The semantic meaning of pornography stimuli for college males. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 4, 204-9.
44. Worling, J.R. (2006) Assessing sexual arousal with adolescent males who have offended sexually: self-report and unobtrusively measured viewing time. Sex Abuse, 8, 383-400
45. Zamansky, H.S. (1956) A technique for measuring homosexual tendencies. Journal of Personality, 24, 436-48.
46. Zolondek, S.C., Abel, G.G., Northey, W.F. Jr and Jordan, A.D. (2001) The self-reported behaviors of juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 73-85.