Effect of sodium sulfate on the viscosity, tack, and adhesion properties of SMR 10-based pressure-sensitive adhesive

Journal of Elastomers and Plastics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 85-95

  Khan, Imran ^a   Poh, B T ^a   Badriah, C M ^a  

^a Universiti Sains Malaysia   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

adhesion properties; natural rubber; sodium sulfate; tack; viscosity

Indexed keywords

ADHESION PROPERTIES; ADHESION TEST; ADHESIVE COATINGS; COATING THICKNESS; CROSS-HATCH; MALAYSIANS; NATURAL RUBBER; PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVES; ROLLING BALLS; SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS; SULFATE CONTENT; TACK; TACKIFIERS;

ADHESION; ADHESIVES; COATINGS; FLIGHT DYNAMICS; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; PRESSURE EFFECTS; RESINS; RUBBER; SODIUM; THICKNESS MEASUREMENT; TOLUENE; VISCOSITY;

SODIUM SULFATE;

EID: 78651076142     PISSN: 00952443     EISSN: 15308006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095244310383545     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Dahlquist, C.A. (1969). Treatise on Adhesion and Adhesives, New York, Marcel Dekker, p. 244.
2. Ewins, E.E.J., St. Clair, D.J., Erickson, J.R. and Korcz, W.H. (1989). The Handbook of Pressure-Sensitive Adhesive Technology, 2nd edn, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. 317.
3. Benedek, I. and Heymans, L.J. (1997). Pressure-sensitive Adhesives Technology, New York, Marcel Dekker.
4. Creton, C. (1997). Materials Science and Technology, Weinheim, VCH, Vol. 18, p. 708.
5. Lanrock, A. (1985). Adhesive Technology Handbook, Park Ridge, NJ, Noyes Publishing.
6. Vakula, V.L. (1991). Polymer Adhesion, London, Elis Horwood Ltd, p. 291.
7. Leong, Y.C., Lee, L.M.S. and Gan, S.N. (2003). The Viscoeslastic Properties of Natural Rubber Pressure-sensitive Adhesive Using Acrylic Resin as a Tackifier, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 88: 2118-2123.
8. Choi, S., Nah, C., Seung G.L. and Joo, C.H. (2003). Effect of Filler-Filler Interaction on Rheological Behaviour of Natural Rubber Compounds Filled with both Carbon Black and Silica, Polym. Int., 52: 23-28.
9. Poh, B.T. and Chang, Y.Y. (2006). Viscosity and Peel Strength of SMR 10-based Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives, Polym-Plast Technol Eng., 45: 1251-1256.
10. Poh, B.T. and Chee, C.L. (2007). Effect of Coumarone-Indene Resin on Adhesion Property of SMR 20-based Pressure-sensitive Adhesives, Int. J.Polym. Mater., 56: 247-255.
11. Poh, B.T. and Kwo, H.K. (2007). Shear Strength of SMR-based Pressure-sensitive Adhesives, Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng., 46: 1021-1024.
12. Poh, B.T. and Tan, B.K. (1991). Mooney Scorch Time of Epoxidized Natural Rubber, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 42: 1407-1416.
13. Poh, B.T. and Tang, W.L. (1995). Concentration Effect of Stearic Acid on Scorch Behavior of Epoxidized Natural Rubber, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 55: 537-542.
14. Poh, B.T., Kwok, C.P. and Lim, G.H. (1995). Reversion Behaviour of Epoxidized Natural Rubber, Eur. Polym. J., 31: 223-226.
15. Poh, B.T., Chen, M.F. and Ding, B.S. (1996). Cure Characteristics of Unaccelerated Sulfur Vulcanization of Epoxidized Natural Rubber, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 60: 1569-1574.
16. Sadequl, A.M., Ishiaku, U.S., Ismail, H. and Poh, B.T. (1998). The Effect of Accelerator/Sulphur Ratio on the Scorch Time of Epoxidized Natural Rubber, Eur. Polym. J., 34: 51-57.
17. Poh, B.T. and Razai, M.J. (1999). Abrasion Property of Epoxidized Natural Rubber, Polym-Plast. Technol. Eng., 38: 341-350.
18. Poh, B.T. and Khok, G.K. (2000). Tensile Property of Epoxidized Natural Rubber/Natural Rubber Blends, Polym-Plast. Technol. Eng., 39: 151-161.
19. Poh, B.T. and Te, C.S. (2000). Cure Index and Activation Energy of Vulcanization of Natural Rubber and Epoxidized Natural Rubber Vulcanized in the Presence of Antioxidants, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 77: 3234-3238.
20. Ismail, H. and Poh, B.T. (2000). Cure and Tear Properties of ENR 25/SMR L and ENR 50/SMR L Blends, Eur. Polym. J., 36: 2403-2408.
21. Poh, B.T. and Tan, E.K. (2001). Mooney Scorch Time and Cure Index of Epoxidized Natural Rubber in Presence of Sodium Carbonate, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 82: 1352-1355.
22. Poh, B.T. and Lim, A.L. (2008). Adhesion Properties of Pressure-sensitive Adhesives Prepared from SMR 10/ENR 25, SMR 10/ENR 50, and ENR 25/ ENR 50 Blends, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 109: 115-119.
23. Poh, B.T. and Kwo, H.K. (2007). Peel and Shear Strength of Pressure-sensitive Adhesives Prepared from Epoxidized Natural Rubber, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 105: 680-684.
24. Poh, B.T. and Yong, A.T. (2009). Dependence of Peel Adhesion on Molecular Weight of Epoxidized Natural Rubber, J. Adhesion., 85: 435-446.
25. Poh, B.T. and Yong, A.T. (2010). Effect of Molecular Weight of Epoxidized-Natural Rubber on Viscosity and Tack of Pressure-sensitive Adhesives, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 115: 1120-1124.
26. Poh, B.T. and Yong, A.T. (2009). Effect of Molecular Weight of Epoxidized-Natural Rubber on Shear Strength of Adhesives, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 114: 3976-3979.
27. Poh, B.T. and Chow, S.K. (2007). Effect of Zinc Oxide on the Viscosity, Tack, and Peel Strength of ENR 25-based Pressure-sensitive Adhesives, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 106: 333-337.
28. Poh, B.T. and Chew, C.E. (2009). Effect of Kaolin on Adhesion Property of Epoxidized Natural Rubber-based Pressure-sensitive Adhesive Using Gum Rosin as the Tackifier, J. Elastom. Plast., 41: 447-456.
29. Poh, B.T., Lee, P.G. and Chuah, C.S. (2008). Adhesion Property of Epoxidized Natural Rubber (ENR)-based Adhesives Containing Calcium Carbonate, Expess Polym. Lett., 2: 398-403.
30. Poh, B.T. and Gan, C.F. (2010). Viscosity and Peel Strength of Magnesium Oxide-filled Adhesive Prepared from Epoxidized Natural Rubber (ENR 25), Polym-Plast. Technol. Eng., 49: 191-194.
31. Skeist, I. (ed.) (1990). Handbook of Adhesives, 3 rd edn, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, p. 179, 563, 565.
32. Issam, A.M., Poh, B.T., Abdul Khalil, H.P.S. and Lee, W.C. (2009). Adhesion Properties of Adhesive Prepared from Waste Polystyrene, J. Polym. Environ., 17: 165-169.
33. Urban, D. and Takamura, K. (2002). Polymer Dispersion and their Industrial Applications, New York, Wiley-VCH.