Towards establishing good practice in the use of computer prediction

Quality Assurance Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 120-125

  Judson, Philip Neville ^a  

^a Heather Lea Bland Hill Norwood   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer modelling; QSAR; regulatory affairs; software quality assurance; toxicity prediction

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; LAW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TOXICITY TESTING;

EID: 78651066212     PISSN: 10878378     EISSN: 10991786     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qaj.457     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of federal regulations 40 CFR part 160 Federal insecticide, fungicide and rodenticide act (FIFRA): good laboratory practice standards. 2nd June 2003. Available from:.
2. Environmental Protection Agency. Code of federal regulations 40 CFR part 179 Toxic substances control act (TSCA): good laboratory practice standards. 2nd June 2003. Available from:.
3. United Nations. Globally harmonised system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS). New York and Geneva, 2003.
4. European Union. Official Journal of the European Union: regulation (EC) no. 1272/2008 of the European parliament and of the council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. 16 December 2008.
5. Jaworska JS, Comber MHI, Auer C, van Leeuwen KJ,. Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints. Environ Health Perspectives 2003; 111: 1358-1360.
6. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Principles for the Validation, for Regulatory Purposes, of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship Models. 19th December 2006. Available from:.
7. Worth AP, Bassan A, De Bruijn A, Saliner AG, Netzeva T, Patlewicz G, et al. The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods. SAR and QSAR in Environ Res 2007; 18 (1-2): 111-125.
8. Dimitrov S, Dimitrova G, Pavlov T, Dimitrova N, Patlewicz G, Niemela J, et al. A stepwise approach for defining the applicability domain of SAR and QSAR models. J Chem Inf Model 2005; 45: 839-849.
9. Organisation for International Cooperation and Development. The OECD (Q)SAR Toolbox. Available from:.
10. Kristam R, Gillet VJ, Lewis RA, Thorner D,. Comparison of conformational analysis techniques to generate pharmacophore hypotheses using Catalyst. J Chem Inf Model 2005; 45: 461-476.
11. Â is supplied by Accelrys, 9685 North Scranton Road, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
12. Lhasa Limited, 22-23 Blenheim Terrace, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9HD, England.
13. Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry, University 'Prof. Assen Zlatarov', 1 Yakimov Street, Bourgas, 8010 Bulgaria.