Mixed incontinence: Comparing definitions in non-surgical patients

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 47-51

  Brubaker, Linda ^a   Lukacz, Emily S ^b   Burgio, Kathryn ^c   Zimmern, Philippe ^d   Norton, Peggy ^e   Leng, Wendy ^f   Johnson, Harry ^g   Kraus, Stephen ^h   Stoddard, Anne ⁱ  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

ⁱ New England Eye Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

mixed incontinence; nomenclature; stress incontinence; urge incontinence; urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL EPIDEMIOLOGIC AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF AGING QUESTIONNAIRE; MIXED INCONTINENCE; PREDICTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEVEN DAY URINARY DIARY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; URGE INCONTINENCE; URINE INCONTINENCE; UROGENITAL DISTRESS INVENTORY;

AGED; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BENZHYDRYL COMPOUNDS; CRESOLS; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URINARY INCONTINENCE, URGE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 78651065151     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20922     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21: 2002; 167.
2. Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, et al. Patient-selected goals: A new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189: 2003; 1551.
3. Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Steers WD,. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: Long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191: 2004; 201.
4. Mahajan ST, Elkadry EA, Shott S, et al. Patient selected goals: Perspectives on surgical outcomes one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194: 2006; 722.
5. Brubaker L, Richter SA, Zimmern H, et al. Mixed incontinence: Comparing definitions in women having stress incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 28: 2009; 268.
6. Burgio K, Kraus S, Menefee S, et al. Behavior therapy to enable drug discontinuation in the treatment of urge incontinence: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med, 149: 2008; 161.
7. The Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN). Design of the Behavior Enhances Drug Reduction of Incontinence (BE-DRI) study. Contemp Clin Trials 28: 2007; 48.
8. Burgio KL, Goode PS, Richter HE, et al. Global ratings of patient satisfaction and perceptions of improvement with treatment for urinary incontinence: Validation of three global patient ratings. Neurourol Urodyn 25: 2006; 411.
9. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, et al. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res 3: 1994; 291.
10. Brubaker L, Stoddard A, Richter H, et al. Mixed incontinence: Comparing definitions in women having stress incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 28: 2009; 268.
11. Minassian VA, Stewart WF, Hirsch AG,. Why do stress and urge incontinence co-occur much more often than expected? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008.
12. Davis TL, Lukacz ES, Luber KM, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction after the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191: 2004; 176.
13. Brubaker L, Moalli P, Richter H, et al. Challenges in designing a progmatic clinical trail: the mixed incontinence-medical or surgical approach (MIMOSA) trial experience. Clin Trials, 6: 2009; 355.
14. Dmochowski R, Staskin D,. Mixed incontinence: Definitions, outcomes, and interventions. Curr Opin Urol 15: 2005; 374.
15. Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW, et al. Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol 20: 2003; 327.
16. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, et al. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: The Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trondelag. J Clin Epidemiol 53: 2000; 1150.
17. Minassian VA, Stewart WF, Wood GC,. Urinary incontinence in women: Variation in prevalence estimates and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 111: 2008; 324.
18. Dooley Y, Kenton K, Cao G, et al. Urinary incontinence prevalence: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). J Urol 179: 2008; 656.
19. Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, et al. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int 93: 2004; 324.