There are at least two kinds of probability matching: Evidence from a secondary task

Cognition

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 274-279

  Otto, A Ross ^a   Taylor, Eric G ^b   Markman, Arthur B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Dual systems; Heuristics and biases; Probability matching

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROBABILITY;

EID: 78651061741     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974, 19(6):716-723.
2. Ashby F.G., Alfonso-Reese L.A., Turken A.U., Waldron E.M. A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review 1998, 105(3):442-481.
3. Ashby F.G., Maddox W.T. Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology 2005, 56(1):149-178.
4. Fantino E., Esfandiari A. Probability matching: Encouraging optimal responding in humans. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2002, 56(1):58-63.
5. Filoteo J.V., Lauritzen J.S., Maddox W.T. Removing the frontal lobes: The effects of engaging executive functions on perceptual category learning. Psychological Science 2010, 21(3):415-423.
6. Foerde K., Knowlton B.J., Poldrack R.A. Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006, 103(31):11778-11783.
7. Gaissmaier W., Schooler L.J. The smart potential behind probability-matching. Cognition 2008, 109(3):416-422.
8. Green C.S., Benson C., Kersten D., Schrater P. Alterations in choice behavior by manipulations of world model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107(37):16401-16406.
9. Henke K. A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2010, 11(7):523-532.
10. Herrnstein R.J., Rachlin H., Laibson D.I. The matching law 2000, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Hinson J.M., Staddon J.E.R. Hill-climbing by pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1983, 39(1):25-47.
12. Koehler D.J., James G. Probability-matching in choice under uncertainty: Intuition versus deliberation. Cognition 2009, 113(1):123-127.
13. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116(2):220-244.
14. Rescorla, R., & Wagner, A. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 99, 64). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
15. Shimp C.P. Short-term memory in the pigeon: The previously reinforced response. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1976, 26(3):487-493.
16. Sugrue L.P., Corrado G.S., Newsome W.T. Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex. Science 2004, 304(5678):1782-1787.
17. Vulkan N. An economist's perspective on probability-matching. Journal of Economic Surveys 2000, 14(1):101-118.
18. Wolford G., Miller M.B., Gazzaniga M. The left hemisphere's role in hypothesis formation. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20(6):RC64.
19. Wolford G.L., Newman S.E., Miller M.B., Wig G.S. Searching for patterns in random sequences. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 58(4):221-228.