Entangled coherent states versus entangled photon pairs for practical quantum-information processing

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Park, Kimin ^a   Jeong, Hyunseok ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECOHERENCE; DECOHERENCE EFFECTS; ENTANGLED COHERENT STATE; ENTANGLED PHOTON PAIRS; ENTANGLED STATE; INEFFICIENT DETECTORS; PHOTON LOSS; QUANTUM CHANNEL; QUANTUM-INFORMATION PROCESSING; REALISTIC CONDITIONS;

COHERENT LIGHT; DATA PROCESSING; PHOTONS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 78650996404     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.062325     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.135 79, 135 (2007).
2. T. C. Ralph and G. J. Pryde, Prog. Opt. POPTAN 0079-6638 10.1016/S0079-6638(10)05409-0 54, 209 (2009).
3. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35051009 409, 46 (2001).
4. D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/46503 402, 390 (1999).
5. L. Vaidman and N. Yoran, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.116 59, 116 (1999).
6. N. Lütkenhaus, J. Calsamiglia, and K.-A. Suominen, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3295 59, 3295 (1999).
7. D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/37539 390, 575 (1997).
8. J. Calsimiglia and N. Lütkenhaus, Appl. Phys. B 72, 67 (2001).
9. S. J. van Enk and O. Hirota, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022313 64, 022313 (2001).
10. H. Jeong, M. S. Kim, and J. Lee, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052308 64, 052308 (2001).
11. D. Wilson, H. Jeong, and M. S. Kim, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/09500340110109449 49, 851 (2002);
12. H. Jeong and N. Ba An, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.74. 022104 74, 022104 (2006);
13. H. Jeong, W. Son, M. S. Kim, D. Ahn, and C. Brukner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012106 67, 012106 (2003);
14. M. Stobinska, H. Jeong, and T. C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.052105 75, 052105 (2007);
15. H. Jeong, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042101 78, 042101 (2008);
16. C.-W. Lee and H. Jeong, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052105 80, 052105 (2009);
17. H. Jeong, M. Paternostro, and T. C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.060403 102, 060403 (2009);
18. M. Paternostro and H. Jeong, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.032115 81, 032115 (2010).
19. X. Wang, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022302 64, 022302 (2001).
20. H. Jeong and M. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042305 65, 042305 (2002).
21. H. Jeong and M. S. Kim, Quantum Inf. Comput. 2, 208 (2002).
22. T. C. Ralph, A. Gilchrist, G. J. Milburn, W. J. Munro, and S. Glancy, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042319 68, 042319 (2003).
23. N. Ba An, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022321 68, 022321 (2003).
24. A. P. Lund, T. C. Ralph, and H. L. Haselgrove, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.030503 100, 030503 (2008).
25. N. Ba An, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/j.physleta.2009.02.075 373, 1701 (2009).
26. P. Marek and J. Fiuráek, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.014304 82, 014304 (2010).
27. W. P. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2001).
28. C. L. Salter, R. M. Stevenson, I. Farrer, C. A. Nicoll, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature09078 465, 594 (2010).
29. A. Ourjoumtsev, H. Jeong, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature06054 448, 784 (2007).
30. H. Takahashi, K. Wakui, S. Suzuki, M. Takeoka, K. Hayasaka, A. Furusawa, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.233605 101, 233605 (2008).
31. T. Gerrits, S. Glancy, T. S. Clement, B. Calkins, A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, A. L. Migdall, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and E. Knill, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.031802 82, 031802 (2010).
32. A. P. Lund, H. Jeong, T. C. Ralph, and M. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.020101 70, 020101 (R) (2004);
33. P. Marek, H. Jeong, and M. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.063811 78, 063811 (2008).
34. J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, M. Takeuchi, K. Wakui, H. Takahashi, K. Hayasaka, M. Takeoka, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.053602 105, 053602 (2010).
35. E. A. Dauler, A. J. Kerman, and B. S. Robinson, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/09500340802411989 56, 364 (2009).
36. R. Hadfield, Nat. Photon. JMOPEW 1749-4885 10.1038/nphoton.2009.230 3, 696 (2009).
37. B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.6811 45, 6811 (1992).
38. S. J. D. Phoenix, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.5132 41, 5132 (1990).
39. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413 77, 1413 (1996).
40. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2 223, 1 (1996).
41. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314 65, 032314 (2002).
42. S. Lee, D. P. Chi, S. D. Oh, and J. Kim, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.062304 68, 062304 (2003).
43. J. Lee, M. S. Kim, Y.-J. Park, and S. Lee, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/09500340008235138 47, 2151 (2000).
44. M. S. Kim and V. Bužk, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.4239 46, 4239 (1992).
45. A direct comparison between arbitrary polarization qubits, μ | H + ν | V, and coherent-state qubits, μ | α + ν | - α, is not straightforward when α is small due to the nonzero overlap between the two component coherent states. It should be noted that we use the orthogonal basis, | + and | -, for coherent-state qubits in order to calculate the average fidelity for a "fair comparison" with the polarization-qubit case. In this sense, the input coherent-state qubit in comparison to the polarization qubit, μ | H + ν | V, should be considered to be μ | + + ν | -, rather than μ | α + ν | - α, when the overlap | α | - α | 2 is non-negligible.
46. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1888 60, 1888 (1999).