ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 407.e1-407.e33

  Taylor, Allen J ^a   Cerqueira, Manuel ^a   Hodgson, John McB ^a   Mark, Daniel ^a   Min, James ^a,a   O'Gara, Patrick ^a   Rubin, Geoffrey D ^a   Kramer, Christopher M ^a,a   Berman, Daniel ^a   Brown, Alan ^a   Chaudhry, Farooq A ^a   Cury, Ricardo C ^a   Desai, Milind Y ^a   Einstein, Andrew J ^a   Gomes, Antoinette S ^a   Harrington, Robert ^a   Hoffmann, Udo ^a   Khare, Rahul ^a   Lesser, John ^a   McGann, Christopher ^a   Rosenberg, Alan ^a   Schwartz, Robert ^a   Shelton, Marc ^a   Smetana, Gerald W ^a   Smith, Sidney C ^a   Wolk, Michael J ^a   Allen, Joseph M ^a   Bailey, Steven ^a   Douglas, Pamela S ^a   Hendel, Robert C ^a   Patel, Manesh R ^a   Shaw, Leslee ^a   Stainback, Raymond F ^a   more..

^a NONE

Author keywords

ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria; Computed tomographic angiography; Computed tomography; Coronary artery bypass graft surgery; Coronary artery disease; Coronary calcium score; Coronary heart disease; Electrocardiogram; Estimated metabolic equivalents of exercise; Heart failure; Myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Perioperative evaluation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PERFORMANCE; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 78650993744     PISSN: 19345925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hendel R.C., Patel M.R., Kramer C.M., et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1475-1497.
2. Hendel R.C., Berman D.S., Di Carli M.F., et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:2201-2229.
3. Douglas P.S., Khandheria B., Stainback R.F., et al. ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51:1127-1147.
4. Patel M.R., Spertus J.A., Brindis R.G., et al. ACCF proposed method for evaluating the appropriateness of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:1606-1613.
5. Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. 2001. Arlington, VA.
6. Abbara S., Arbab-Zadeh A., Callister T.Q., et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009, 3:190-204.
7. Raff G.L., Abidov A., Achenbach S., et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009, 3:122-136.
8. Budoff M.J., Cohen M.C., Garcia M.J., et al. ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:383-402.
9. Gibbons R.J., Balady G.J., Bricker J.T., et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 40:1531-1540.
10. National Institutes of Health: National Heart LaBI. Third Report pf the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). NIH Publication No. 02-5215. September 2002.
11. Morise A.P., Haddad W.J., Beckner D. Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. Am J Med 1997, 102:350-356.
12. Pryor D.B., Shaw L., McCants C.B., et al. Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1993, 118:81-90.
13. Gibbons R.J., Abrams J., Chatterjee K., et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina-summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 41:159-168.
14. Diamond G.A., Forrester J.S. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979, 300:1350-1358.
15. Douglas P.S., Chen J., Gillam L., et al. Achieving Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging II: proceedings from the Second American College of Cardiology-Duke University Medical Center Think Tank on Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009, 2:231-240.
16. Mark D.B., Berman D.S., Budoff M.J., et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 55:2663-2699.
17. Diamond G.A. A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983, 1:574-575.
18. Antman E.M., Anbe D.T., Armstrong P.W., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:e1-e211.
19. Fleisher L.A., Beckman J.A., Brown K.A., et al. 2009 ACCF/AHA focused update on perioperative beta blockade incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:e13-e118.
20. Campeau L. Letter: grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976, 54:522-523.