Influences of spherical tip radius, contact depth, and contact area on nanoindentation properties of bone

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 285-290

  Paietta, Rachel C ^a   Campbell, Sara E ^a   Ferguson, Virginia L ^a  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

Elastic modulus; Finite element analysis; Lamellar bone; Nanoindentation; Osteon

Indexed keywords

BONE TISSUE; CONTACT AREAS; CONTACT DEPTH; CORTICAL BONE; ELASTIC PROPERTIES; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION; INDENTATION MODULUS; INDENTER TIP GEOMETRY; INDENTER TIP RADIUS; INDENTERS; LAMELLAR BONE; MACROSCOPIC PROPERTIES; MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENT; MINERAL CONTENT; OSTEON; OSTEONS; SINGLE SAMPLE; SPHERICAL INDENTERS; STATISTICAL SAMPLING; TIP RADIUS; TISSUE TYPES;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; ELASTIC MODULI; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LAMELLAR STRUCTURES; NANOINDENTATION; SAMPLING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURFACE DEFECTS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACES; TWO DIMENSIONAL; VICKERS HARDNESS TESTING;

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; BONE MINERAL; BONE STRUCTURE; CONTACT AREA; CONTACT DEPTH; CORTICAL BONE; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; NANOINDENTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPHERICAL TIP RADIUS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE AND BONES; CATTLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HARDNESS TESTS; HAVERSIAN SYSTEM; PLASTICS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 78650989825     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bembey A.K., Bushby A.J., Boyde A., Ferguson V.L., Oyen M.L. Hydration effects on the micro-mechanical properties of bone. Journal of Materials Research 2006, 21:1962-1968.
2. Bembey A.K., Oyen M.L., Bushby A.J., Boyde A. Viscoelastic properties of bone as a function of hydration state determined by nanoindentation. Philosophical Magazine 2006, 86:5691-5703.
3. Bushby A.J. Nano-indentation using spherical indenters. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation 2001, 17:213-234.
4. Bushby A.J., Ferguson V.L., Boyde A. Nanoindentation of bone: comparison of specimens tested in liquid and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate. Journal of Materials Research 2004, 19:249-259.
5. Constantinides G., Kalcioglu Z., McFarland M., Smith J., Van Vliet K. Probing mechanical properties of fully hydrated gels and biological tissues. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41:3285-3289.
6. Donnelly E., Williams R.M., Downs S.A. Quasistatic and dynamic nanomechanical properties of cancellous bone tissue relate to collagen content and organization. Journal of Materials Research 2006, 21:2106-2117.
7. Donnelly E., Baker S.P., Boskey A.L., van der Meulen M.C. Effects of surface roughness and maximum load on the mechanical properties of cancellous bone measured by nanoindentation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 2006, 77:426-435.
8. Donnelly E., Boskey A.L., Baker S.P., van der Meulen M.H.C. Effects of tissue age on bone tissue material composition and nanomechanical properties in the rat cortex. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 2010, 92A:1048-1056.
9. Ferguson V.L., Bushby A.J., Boyde A. Nanomechanical properties and mineral concentration in articular calcified cartilage and subchondral bone. Journal of Anatomy 2003, 203:191-202.
10. Ferguson V.L. Deformation partitioning provides insight into elastic, plastic, and viscous contributions to bone material behavior. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2009, 2:364-374.
11. Guidoni G., Swain M., Jager I. Nanoindentation of wet and dry compact bone: influence of environment and indenter tip geometry on the indentation modulus. Philosophical Magazine 2010, 90:553-565.
12. Guidoni G.M., He L.H., Schoberl T., Jager I., Dehm G., Swain M.V. Influence of the indenter tip geometry and environment on the indentation modulus of enamel. Journal of Materials Research 2009, 24:616-625.
13. Gupta H.S., Stachewicz U., Wagermaier W., Roschger P., Wagner H.D., Fratzl P. Mechanical modulation at the lamellar level in osteonal bone. Journal of Materials Research 2006, 21:1913-1921.
14. He L.H., Fujisawa N., Swain M.V. Elastic modulus and stress-strain response of human enamel by nano-indentation. Biomaterials 2006, 27:4388-4398.
15. Hobdell M., Boyde A. Microradiography and scanning electron microscopy of bone sections. Cell and Tissue Research 1969, 94:487-494.
16. Hoffler C.E., Guo X.E., Zysset P.K., Goldstein S.A. An application of nanoindentation technique to measure bone tissue lamellae properties. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2005, 127:1046-1053.
17. Kádár C., Maire E., Borbely A., Peix G., Lendvai J., Rajkovits Z. X-ray tomography and finite element simulation of the indentation behavior of metal foams. Materials Science and Engineering A 2004, 387:321-325.
18. Lakes R. Materials with Structural Hierarchy. Nature 1993, 361:511-515.
19. Olesiak S.E., Oyen M.L., Ferguson V.L. Viscous-elastic-plastic behavior of bone using Berkovich nanoindentation. Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials 2010, 14:111-124.
20. Olesiak S.E. Nanoindentation of Bio- and Geo-mineralized Composites: Contribution of Microstructure and Composition 2010, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
21. Oliver W.C., Pharr G.M. Improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. Journal of Materials Research 1992, 7:1564-1583.
22. Oyen M.L., Cook R.F. Load-displacement behavior during sharp indentation of viscous-elastic-plastic materials. Journal of Materials Research 2003, 18:139-150.
23. Oyen M.L., Ferguson V.L., Bushby A.J., Boyde A. Composite bounds on the elastic modulus of bone. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41:2585-2588.
24. Rizov V.I. Non-linear indentation behavior of foam core sandwich composite materials-a 2D approach. Computational Materials Science 2006, 35:107-115.
25. Rho J.Y., Zioupos P., Currey J.D., Pharr G.M. Variations in the individual thick lamellar properties within osteons by nanoindentation. BONE 1999, 25:295-300.
26. Tai K.S., Qi H.J., Ortiz C. Effect of mineral content on the nanoindentation properties and nanoscale deformation mechanisms of bovine tibial cortical bone. Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine 2005, 16:947-959.
27. Ulm F., Vandamme M., Bobko C., Ortega J.A., Tai K., Ortiz C. Statistical indentation techniques for hydrated nanocomposites: concrete, bone, and shale. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 2007, 90:2677-2692.
28. Xie Z.H., Swain M.V., Swadener G., Munroe P., Hoffman M. Effect of microstructure upon elastic behaviour of human tooth enamel. Journal of Biomechanics 2009, 42:1075-1080.
29. Zhang J., Michalenko M.M., Kuhl E., Ovaert T.C. Characterization of indentation response and stiffness reduction of bone using a continuum damage model. Journal of Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2010, 3:189-202.
30. Zhao, Y., Ovaert, T. Error Estimation of nanoindentation mechanical properties near a dissimilar interface via finite element analysis and analytical solution methods. Journal of Materials Research, 25, in press, doi:. http://10.1557/JMR.2010.0295.