Implicit prices for longer temporary exhibitions in a heritage site and a test of preference heterogeneity: A segmentation-based approach

Tourism Management

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 511-519

  Choi, Andy S ^a  

^a Gangwon Forest Development Research Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Choice modelling; Confidence intervals; Convolutions approach; Preference heterogeneity; Segmentation; Test of difference

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL HERITAGE; ESTIMATION METHOD; HERITAGE TOURISM; HETEROGENEITY; MODELING; SEGMENTATION; TOURISM MANAGEMENT;

EID: 78650989656     PISSN: None     EISSN: 02615177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Williams M., Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1998, 80(1):64-75.
2. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50:179-211.
3. Armitage C.J., Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 40:471-499.
4. Ashok K., Dillon W.R., Yuan S. Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research 2002, 39:31-46.
5. Bamberg S. How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003, 23(1):21-32.
6. Barton D.N. The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 2002, 42:147-164.
7. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., et al. Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual 2002, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.
8. Ben-Akiva M., McFadden D., Garling T., Gopinath D., Walker J., Bolduc D., et al. Extended framework for modeling choice behavior. Marketing Letters 1999, 10(3):187-203.
9. Bennett J., Adamowicz V. Some fundamentals of environmental choice modelling. The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation 2001, 37-69. E. Elgar, Northampton, MA, USA. J. Bennett, R. Blamey (Eds.).
10. Berenguer J., Corraliza J.A., Martin R. Rural-urban differences in environmental concern, attitudes, and actions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2005, 21(2):128-138.
11. Bollen K.A. Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology 2002, 53:605-634.
12. Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L. Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 2002, 23(4):421-446.
13. Brown T.C., Champ P.A., Bishop R.C., McCollum D.W. Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good?. Land Economics 1996, 72(2):152-166.
14. Choi A.S., Papandrea F., Bennett J. Assessing cultural values: developing an attitudinal scale. Journal of Cultural Economics 2007, 31:311-335.
15. Choi A.S., Ritchie B.W., Papandrea F., Bennett J. Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: a choice modeling approach. Tourism Management 2010, 31:213-220.
16. Cooper J.C. A comparison of approaches to calculating confidence intervals for benefit measures from dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Land Economics 1994, 70(1):111-122.
17. Correia A., Santos C.M., Barros C.P. Tourism in Latin America: a choice analysis. Annals of Tourism Research 2007, 34(3):610-629.
18. Dunlap R.E., Van Liere K.D. The new environmental paradigm: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education 1978, 9:10-19.
19. Dunlap R.E., Van Liere K.D., Mertig A.G., Jones R.E. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56(3):425-442.
20. Eagly A.H., Chaiken S. Psychology of attitudes 1993, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, Texas.
21. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jacknife. Annals of Statistics 1979, 7(1):1-26.
22. Efron B. Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals. Canadian Journal of Statistics 1981, 9:139-172.
23. Efron B. The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans 1982, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
24. Efron B., Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap 1993, Chapman & Hall, New York.
25. Fenwick I. Techniques of market measurement: the jackknife. Journal of Marketing Research 1979, 16(3):410-414.
26. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research 1975, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts.
27. Greene W. Econometric analysis 2003, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 5th ed.
28. Hanley N., Craig S. Wilderness development decisions and the Krutilla-Fisher model: the case of Scotland's flow country. Ecological Economics 1991, 4(2):145-164.
29. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene W.H. Applied choice analysis: A primer 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Hole A.R. A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. Health Economics 2007, 16(8):827-840.
31. Johansson M.V., Heldta T., Johansson P. The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2006, 40(6):507-525.
32. Jones S., Hensher D.A. Predicting firm financial distress: a mixed logit model. The Accounting Review 2004, 79(4):1011-1038.
33. Kahneman D., Ritov I., Jacowitz K.E., Grant P. Stated willingness-to-pay for public goods: a psychological perspective. Psychological Science 1993, 4(5):310-315.
34. Krinsky I., Robb A.L. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics 1986, 68:715-719.
35. Louviere J.J. Choice experiments: an overview of concepts and issues. The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation 2001, 13-36. J. Bennett, R. Blamey (Eds.).
36. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Mazzanti M. Cultural heritage as multi-dimensional, multi-value and multi-attribute economic good: toward a new framework for economic analysis and valuation. Journal of Socio-Economics 2002, 31:529-558.
38. McFadden D. Economic choices. American Economic Review 2001, 91(3):351-378.
39. Mooney C.Z., Duval R.D. Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference 1993, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
40. Morey E., Rossmann K., Chestnut L., Ragland S. Valuing acid deposition injuries to cultural resources 1997, The National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP), Washington, D.C.
41. Morley C. Experimental destination choice analysis. Annals of Tourism Research 1994, 21(4):780-791.
42. Noonan D. Contingent valuation and cultural resources: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Journal of Cultural Economics 2003, 27:159-176.
43. Park T., Loomis J.B., Creel M. Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. Land Economics 1991, 67(1):64-73.
44. Poe G.L., Severance-Lossin E.K., Welsh M.P. Measuring the difference (X-Y) of simulated distributions: a convolutions approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1994, 76(4):904-915.
45. Ready R., Navrud S., Day B., Dubourg R., Machado F., Mourato S., et al. Benefit transfer in Europe: how reliable are transfers between countries?. Environmental and Resource Economics 2004, 29(1):67-82.
46. Rodgers J.L. The bootstrap, the jackknife, and the randomisation test: a sample taxonomy. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1999, 34(4):441-456.
47. Rolfe J., Bennett J. Valuing international rainforests: A choice modelling approach 1996, School of Economics and Management, University College, University of New South Wales, Canberra.
48. Scarpa R., Drucker A.G., Anderson S., Ferraes-Ehuan N., Gomez V., Risopatron C.R., et al. Valuing genetic resources in peasant economies: the case of 'hairless' creole pigs in Yucatan. Ecological Economics 2003, 45:427-443.
49. Seligman C., Syme G.J., Gilchrist R. The role of values and ethical principles in judgments of environmental dilemmas. Journal of Social Issues 1994, 50(3):105-119.
50. Stern P.C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56(3):407-424.
51. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Guagnano G.A. The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior 1995, 27(6):723-743.
52. Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press.
53. Train K., McFadden D., Goett A. Consumer attitudes and voluntary rate schedules for public utilities. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1987, 69(3):383-391.
54. Turkey J.W. Bias and confidence in not-quite large samples. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1958, 29:614. (abstract).
55. Walker J., Ben-Akiva M. Generalized random utility model. Mathematical Social Sciences 2002, 43:303-343.
56. Widegren O. The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environment and Behavior 1998, 30(1):75-100.