An approach to improve the indicator weights of scientific and technological competitiveness evaluation of Chinese universities

Scientometrics

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 285-297

  Ding, Jingda ^a   Qiu, Junping ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Approach; Evaluation; Improvement; Indicator weights

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650988635     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0268-7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bonnevie-Nebelong, E. (2006). Methods for journal evaluation: Journal citation identity, journal citation image and internationalization. Scientometrics, 66(2), 411-424.
2. Butler, L. (2002). Identifying 'highly-rated' journals-an Australian case study. Scientometrics, 53(2), 207-227.
3. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1992). A multicriteria approach for evaluating the performance of industrial firms. Omega, 20, 467-474.
4. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471-479.
5. Guo, Y. J. (2007). The theory, method and application of comprehensive evaluation. Beijing: Science Press.
6. Higgins, J. C. (1989). Performance measurement in universities. European Journal of Operational Research, 38, 358-368.
7. Huang, M. H., Chang, H. W., & Chen, D. Z. (2006). Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003. Scientometrics, 67(3), 419-435.
8. Hwang, C. L., & Lin, M. J. (1987). Group decision making under multiple criteria: Methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.
9. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.
10. Kao, C., & Pao, H. L. (2009). An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities. Scientometrics, 78(2), 261-277.
11. Ma, J., Fan, Z. P., & Huang, L. H. (1999). A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 112, 397-404.
12. Madu, C. N. (1994). A quality confidence procedure for GDSS application in multicriteria decision making. IIE Transactions, 26(3), 31-39.
13. Mao, D. X. (2002). A combinational evaluation method resulting in consistency between subjective and objective evaluation in the least squares sense. Journal of Chinese Management Science, 10(5), 95-97.
14. McGrath, W. E. (1987). Ratings and rankings: Multiple comparisons of mean ratings. College and Research Libraries, 48, 169-172.
15. Morrissey, A. J., & Browne, J. (2004). Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Management, 24, 297-308.
16. Qiu, J. P. (2005). The evaluation report of Chinese universities and specialties of 2005-2006. Beijing: Science Press.
17. Qiu, J. P. (2006). The evaluation report of Chinese universities and specialties of 2006-2007. Beijing: Science Press.
18. Qiu, J. P. (2007). The evaluation report of Chinese universities and specialties of 2007-2008. Beijing: Science Press.
19. Qiu, J. P. (2008). The evaluation report of Chinese universities and specialties of 2008-2009. Beijing: Science Press.
20. Qiu, J. P. (2009). The evaluation report of Chinese universities and specialties of 2009-2010. Beijing: Science Press.
21. Raan, A. (1999). Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities. Scientometrics, 45(3), 418-420.
22. Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281.
23. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Saaty, T. L. (1990). Multicriteria decision making: The analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
25. Thomson Scientific (2010). ESI v2. 0 Reference Card. Retrieved January 24, 2010 from http://scientific. thomson. com/media/scpdf/esi-0805-q. pdf.
26. Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. NY: McGraw-Hill.