Dry deposition of gaseous elemental mercury to plants and soils using mercury stable isotopes in a controlled environment

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 848-855

  Rutter, Andrew P ^a   Schauer, James J ^a,b   Shafer, Martin M ^a,b   Creswell, Joel E ^a   Olson, Michael R ^a   Robinson, Michael ^a   Collins, Ryan M ^a   Parman, Andrew M ^a   Katzman, Tanya L ^a   Mallek, Justin L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE   (United States)

Author keywords

Atmospheric; Dry deposition; Foliar accumulation; ICPMS; Mercury; Plants; Stable isotopes

Indexed keywords

DRY DEPOSITION; FOLIAR ACCUMULATION; ICPMS; MERCURY; PLANTS; STABLE ISOTOPES;

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA MASS SPECTROMETRY; ISOTOPES; LEACHING; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; SILT;

MERCURY (METAL);

MERCURY; STABLE ISOTOPE;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; BIOACCUMULATION; DICOTYLEDON; DRY DEPOSITION; INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA METHOD; MERCURY (ELEMENT); POLLUTION EFFECT; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL TYPE; STABLE ISOTOPE; VAPOR PRESSURE;

ARTICLE; DIGESTION; DRY DEPOSITION; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FOLIAGE; FRAXINUS; GASEOUS ELEMENTAL MERCURY; NONHUMAN; PLANT; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; POA; POLLUTANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SOIL; VAPOR; WHITE SPRUCE;

FRAXINUS AMERICANA; PICEA GLAUCA; POA; POA PRATENSIS;

EID: 78650986331     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.025     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bash J.O., Miller D.R. Growing season total gaseous mercury (TGM) flux measurements over an Acer rubrum L. stand. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43:5953-5961.
2. Bloom N., Fitzgerald W.F. Determination of volatile mercury species at the picogram level by low-temperature gas-chromatography with cold-vapor atomic fluorescence detection. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1988, 208:151-161.
3. Blum J.D., Bergquist B.A. Reporting of variations in the natural isotopic composition of mercury. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 388:353-359.
4. Browne C.L., Fang S.C. Uptake of mercury-vapor by wheat-assimilation model. Plant. Physiol. 1978, 61:430-433.
5. Du S.H., Fang S.C. Uptake of elemental mercury-vapor by C3-species and C4-species. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1982, 22:437-443.
6. Du S.H., Fang S.C. Catalase activity of C-3 and C-4 species and its relationship to mercury-vapor uptake. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1983, 23:347-353.
7. Ericksen J.A., Gustin M.S., Schorran D.E., Johnson D.W., Lindberg S.E., Coleman J.S. Accumulation of atmospheric mercury in forest foliage. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37:1613-1622.
8. Fitzgerald W.F., Gill G.A. Sub-Nanogram determination of mercury by 2-Stage gold amalgamation and gas-phase detection applied to atmospheric analysis. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51:1714-1720.
9. Graydon J.A., St Louis V.L., Lindberg S.E., Hintelmann H., Krabbenhoft D.P. Investigation of mercury exchange between forest canopy vegetation and the atmosphere using a new dynamic chamber. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:4680-4688.
10. Hall B.D., St Louis V.L. Methylmercury and total mercury in plant litter decomposing in upland forests and flooded landscapes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38:5010-5021.
11. Hintelmann H., Ogrinc N. Determination of stable mercury isotopes by ICP/MS and their application in environmental studies. Biogeochemistry of Environmentally Important Trace Elements 2003, 321-338. Amer Chemical Soc, Washington. Y. Cai, O.C. Braids (Eds.).
12. Hintelmann H., Harris R., Heyes A., Hurley J.P., Kelly C.A., Krabbenhoft D.P., Lindberg S., Rudd J.W.M., Scott K.J., St Louis V.L. Reactivity and mobility of new and old mercury deposition in a Boreal forest ecosystem during the first year of the METAALICUS study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:5034-5040.
13. Jarvis P.G. Interpretation of variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in field. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 1976, 273:593-610.
14. Jurik T.W., Weber J.A., Gates D.M. Effects of temperature and light on photosynthesis of dominant species of a northern hardwood forest. Bot. Gaz. 1988, 149:203-208.
15. Keller T.H. The use of peroxidase activity for monitoring and mapping air pollution areas. Eur. J. Forest Pathol. 1974, 4:11-19.
16. Landis M.S., Stevens R.K., Schaedlich F., Prestbo E.M. Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:3000-3009.
17. Lin C.J., Pehkonen S.O. The chemistry of atmospheric mercury: a review. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33:2067-2079.
18. Lynam M.M., Keeler G.J. Comparison of methods for particulate phase mercury analysis: sampling and analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 374:1009-1014.
19. Man R., Lieffers V.J. Seasonal photosynthetic responses to light and temperature in white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings planted under an aspen (Populus tremuloides) canopy and in the open. Tree Physiol 1997, 17:437-444.
20. Millhollen A.G., Gustin M.S., Obrist D. Foliar mercury accumulation and exchange for three tree species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:6001-6006.
21. National Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture 2008, NRCS, Web Soil Survey.
22. Pacyna J.M., Pacyna E.G., Aas W. Changes of emissions and atmospheric deposition of mercury, lead, and cadmium. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43:117-127.
23. Pellizzari, D., Fernando, R., Cramer, G.M., Meaburn, G.M., Bangerter, K., 1999. Analysis of mercury in hair of EPA region V population, J. Expos. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 9, 393-401.
24. Perez-Priego O., Testi L., Orgaz F., Villalobos F.J. A large closed canopy chamber for measuring CO2 and water vapour exchange of whole trees. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 68:131-138.
25. Premachandra G.S., Chaney W.R., Holt H.A. Gas exchange and water relations of Fraxinus americana affected by flurprimidol. Tree. Physiol. 1997, 17:97-103.
26. Rea A.W., Lindberg S.E., Scherbatskoy T., Keeler G.J. Mercury accumulation in foliage over time in two northern mixed-hardwood forests. Water. Air. Soil. Pollut. 2002, 133:49-67.
27. Rutter A.P., Hanford K.L., Zwers J.T., Perillo-Nicholas A.L., Schauer J.J., Worley C.A., Olson M.L., DeWild J.F. Evaluation of an off-line method for the analysis of atmospheric reactive gaseous mercury and particulate mercury. J. Air. Waste. Manag. Assoc. 2007.
28. Rutter A.P., Schauer J.J., Lough G.C., Snyder D.C., Kolb C.J., Von Klooster S., Rudolf T., Manolopoulos H., Olson M.L. A comparison of speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban center and an upwind rural location. J. Environ. Monit. 2008, 10:102-108.
29. St Louis V.L., Rudd J.W.M., Kelly C.A., Hall B.D., Rolfhus K.R., Scott K.J., Lindberg S.E., Dong W. Importance of the forest canopy to fluxes of methyl mercury and total mercury to boreal ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35:3089-3098.
30. Stamenkovic J., Gustin M.S. Nonstomatal versus stomatal uptake of atmospheric mercury. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:1367-1372.
31. Stamenkovic J., Gustin M.S., Arnone J.A., Johnson D.W., Larsen J.D., Verburg P.S.J. Atmospheric mercury exchange with a tallgrass prairie ecosystem housed in mesocosms. Sci. Total. Environ. 2008, 406:227-238.
32. Stewart J.B. Modeling surface conductance of Pine forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 1988, 43:19-35.
33. Warren C.R. Stand aside stomata, another actor deserves centre stage: the forgotten role of the internal conductance to CO2 transfer. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59:1475-1487.
34. Xiao Z., Sommar J., Wei S., Lindqvist O. Sampling and determination of gas phase divalent mercury in the air using a KCl coated denuder. Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 1997, 358:386-391.