A comparison of three different guidelines for osteoporosis treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Korea

Korean Journal of Internal Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 436-446

  Yoon, Jiyeol ^a   Kwon, Seong Ryul ^a   Lim, Mie Jin ^a   Joo, Kowoon ^a   Moon, Chang Gi ^a   Jang, Jihun ^a   Park, Won ^a  

^a Inha University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Arthritis; Osteoporosis; Rheumatoid

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; KOREA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PATIENT CODING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE;

AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; BONE DENSITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; KOREA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREVALENCE;

EID: 78650983012     PISSN: 12263303     EISSN: 20056648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2010.25.4.436     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sinigaglia L, Nervetti A, Mela Q, et al. A multicenter cross sectional study on bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis. Italian Study Group on Bone Mass in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol 2000;27:2582-2589.
2. Sinigaglia L, Varenna M, Girasole G, Bianchi G. Epidemiology of osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2006;32:631-658.
3. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C, et al. Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:581-589.
4. Korean Health Insurance Review Agency. General Guideline of Pharmacologic Intervention For Osteoporosis [Internet]. Seoul (KR): Health Insurance Review Agency, c2010 [cited 2010 May 20]. Available from: http://www.hira.or.kr.
5. Baim S, Binkley N, Bilezikian JP, et al. Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference. J Clin Densitom 2008;11:75-91.
6. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A. Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX:assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 2008;19:1395-1408.
7. World Health Organization. FRAX WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool. V3.0 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization, c2009 [cited 2010 Mar 20]. Available from: http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/index.htm.
8. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis [Internet]. Washington (DC): National Osteoporosis Foundation, c2010 [cited 2010 Mar 20]. Available from: http://www.nof.org.
9. Orimo H, Sugioka Y, Fukunaga M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 1998;16:139-150.
10. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1994;843:1-129.
11. May WL, Johnson WD. The validity and power of tests for equality of two correlated proportions. Stat Med 1997;16:1081-1096.
12. Joo YS, Lee SS, Kim WU, et al. Generalized osteoporosis in Korean rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Korean Rheum Assoc 2000;7:32-42.
13. Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK. Bone mineral density and frequency of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from 394 patients in the Oslo County Rheumatoid Arthritis register. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:522-530.
14. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Survey 4th 2008 [Internet]. Seoul (KR): Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, c2009 [cited 2010 May 20]. Available from: http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr.
15. Fujiwara S, Nakamura T, Orimo H, et al. Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). Osteoporos Int 2008;19:429-435.
16. World Health Organization. WHO Scientific Group on the Assessment of Osteoporosis at Primary Health Care Level. In: WHO, Summary Meeting Report; 2004 May 5-7; Brussels, Belgium. Geneva: WHO Press, 2004.
17. Ensrud KE, Lui LY, Taylor BC, et al. A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better? Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2087-2094.
18. Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Lix LM. Simplified system for absolute fracture risk assessment: clinical validation in Canadian women. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:353-360.
19. Donaldson MG, Cawthon PM, Lui LY, et al. Estimates of the proportion of older white women who would be recommended for pharmacologic treatment by the new U.S. National Osteoporosis Foundation Guidelines. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:675-680.
20. Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C, et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2008;19:399-428.