Importance of crustal corrections in the development of a new global model of radial anisotropy

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 115, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

  Panning, M P ^a   Lekic V ^b,c   Romanowicz, B A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CORE-MANTLE BOUNDARY; CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA INVERSION; DATA SET; MANTLE STRUCTURE; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRANSITION ZONE; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

EID: 78650965565     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2010JB007520     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bassin, C, G. Laske, and G. Masters (2000), The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America, Eos Trans. AGU, 81(48), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract S12A-03.
2. Becker, T., B. Kustowski, and G. Ekström (2008), Radial seismic anisot-ropy as a constraint for upper mantle rheology, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 267, 213-227, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.038.
3. Beghein, C. (2010), Radial anisotropy and prior petrological constraints: A comparative study, J. Geophys. Res., 115, B03303, doi:10.1029/2008JB005842.
4. Beghein, C, and J. Trampert (2004a), Probability density functions for radial anisotropy for fundamental mode surface wave data and the Neighbourhood Algorithm, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 1163-1174, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004. 02235.x. (Pubitemid 38933459)
5. Beghein, C, and J. Trampert (2004b), Probability density functions for radial anisotropy: Implications for the upper 1200 km of the Earth, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett, 217, 151-162, doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00575-2. (Pubitemid 38043181)
6. Beghein, C, J. Resovsky, and R. van der Hilst (2008), The signal of mantle anisotropy in the coupling of normal modes, Geophys. J. Int., 175, 1209-1234, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03970.x.
7. Boschi, L., and A. Dziewonski (2000), Whole Earth tomography from delay times of P, PcP, and PKP phases: Lateral heterogeneities in the outer core or radial anisotropy in the mantle?, J. Geophys. Res., 105(B6), 13,675-13,696, doi:10.1029/2000JB900059.
8. Boschi, L., and G. Ekström (2002), New images of the Earth's upper mantle from measurements of surface wave phase velocity anomalies, J. Geophys. Res., 107(B4), 2059, doi:10.1029/2000JB000059.
9. Bozda, E., and J. Trampert (2008), On crustal corrections in surface wave tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 172, 1066-1082, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007. 03690.x.
10. Ferreira, A. M. G., J. H. Woodhouse, K. Visser, and J. Trampert (2010), On the robustness of global radially anisotropic surface wave tomography, J. Geophys. Res., 115, B04313, doi:10.1029/2009JB006716.
11. Gu, Y., A. Dziewonski, and G. Ekström (2003), Simultaneous inversion for mantle shear velocity and topography of transition zone discontinuities, Geophys. J. Int., 154, 559-583, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01967.x. (Pubitemid 36967920)
12. Gung, Y., M. Panning, and B. Romanowicz (2003), Global anisotropy and the thickness of continents, Nature, 422, 707-711, doi:10.1038/nature01559. (Pubitemid 36514106)
13. Houser, C, G. Masters, P. Shearer, and G. Laske (2008), Shear and compressional velocity models of the mantle from cluster analysis of long-period waveforms, Geophys. J. Int., 174, 195-212, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03763. x.
14. Kaminski, E., and N. Ribe (2001), A kinematic model for recrystallization and texture development in olivine polycrystals, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett, 189, 253-267, doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00356-9. (Pubitemid 32710509)
15. Karato, S.-I., H. Jung, I. Katayama, and P. Skemer (2008), Geodynamic significance of seismic anisotropy of the upper mantle: New insights from laboratory studies, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 36, 59-95, doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124120. (Pubitemid 351883470)
16. Komatitsch, D., and J.-P. Vilotte (1998), The spectral-element method: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 88(2), 368-392.
17. Kustowski, B., A. Dziewoski, and G. Ekström (2007), Nonlinear crustal corrections for normal-mode seismograms, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97(5), 1756-1762, doi:10.1785/0120070041. (Pubitemid 350002017)
18. Kustowski, B., G. Ekström, and A. M. Dziewo?ski (2008), Anisotropic shear wave velocity structure of the Earth's mantle: A global model, J. Geophys. Res., 113, B06306, doi:10.1029/2007JB005169.
19. Lay, T., Q. Williams, E. Garnero, L. Kellogg, and M. Wysession (1998), Seismic wave anisotropy in the D" region and its implications, in The Core-Mantle Boundary Region, Geodyn. Ser.,vol. 28, edited by M. Gurnis et al., pp. 299-318, AGU, Washington, D. C.
20. Leki, V., M. Panning, and B. Romanowicz (2010), A simple method for improving crustal corrections in waveform tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 265-278, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04602.x.
21. Li, C, R. van der Hilst, and M. Toksöz (2006), Constraining P-wave velocity variation in the upper mantle beneath Southeast Asia, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 154, 180-195, doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2005.09.008. (Pubitemid 43174827)
22. Li, X.-D., and B. Romanowicz (1995), Comparison of global waveform inversions with and without considering cross-branch modal coupling, Geophys. J. Int., 121, 695-709, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995. tb06432.x.
23. Li, X.-D., and B. Romanowicz (1996), Global mantle shear velocity model developed using nonlinear asymptotic coupling theory, J. Geophys. Res., 101(B10), 22,245-22,272, doi:10.1029/96JB01306.
24. Marone, F., and B. Romanowicz (2007), Non-linear crustal correction in high-resolution regional waveform seismic tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 170(1), 460-467, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03399.x. (Pubitemid 47044677)
25. Mégnin, C, and B. Romanowicz (1999), The effect of theoretical formalism and data selection scheme on mantle models derived from waveform tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 366-380, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.1999.00869. x. (Pubitemid 29511536)
26. Mégnin, C, and B. Romanowicz (2000), The 3D shear velocity structure of the mantle from the inversion of body, surface, and higher mode waveforms, Geophys. J. Int., 143, 709-728, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2000.00298.x. (Pubitemid 32015444)
27. Meier, U., A. Curtis, and J. Trampert (2007), Fully nonlinear inversion of fundamental mode surface waves for a global crustal model, Geophys. Res. Lett, 34, L16304, doi:10.1029/2007GL030989. (Pubitemid 350065315)
28. Montagner, J.-P., and N. Jobert (1988), Vectorial tomography: II. Application to the Indian Ocean, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc, 94, 309-344.
29. Montagner, J.-P., and H.-C. Nataf (1988), Vectorial tomography: I. Theory, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc, 94, 295-307.
30. Montelli, R., G. Nolet, F. Dahlen, G. Masters, E. Engdahl, and S.-H. Hung (2004), Finite-frequency tomography reveals a variety of plumes in the mantle, Science, 303, 338-343, doi:10.1126/science.1092485. (Pubitemid 38095767)
31. Montelli, R., G. Nolet, F. Dahlen, and G. Masters (2006), A catalogue of deep mantle plumes: New results from finite-frequency tomography, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst, 7, Q11007, doi:10.1029/2006GC001248.
32. Mooney, W., G. Laske, and G. Masters (1998), CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5 × 5 degrees, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 727-747, doi:10.1029/97JB02122.
33. Panning, M., and G. Nolet (2008), Surface wave tomography for azimuthal anisotropy in a strongly reduced parameter space, Geophys. J. Int., 174(2), 629-648, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03833.x.
34. Panning, M., and B. Romanowicz (2004), Inferences on flow at the base of Earth's mantle based on seismic anisotropy, Science, 303, 351-353, doi:10.1126/science.1091524. (Pubitemid 38095770)
35. Panning, M., and B. Romanowicz (2006), A three-dimensional radially anisotropic model of shear velocity in the whole mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 361-379, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03100.x. (Pubitemid 44489897)
36. Panning, M., Y. Capdeville, and B. Romanowicz (2009), Seismic waveform modelling in a 3-D Earth using the Born approximation: Potential shortcomings and a remedy, Geophys. J. Int., 177, 161-178, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008. 04050.x.
37. Park, J. (1993), The sensitivity of seismic free oscillations to upper mantle anisotropy: 1. Zonal symmetry, J. Geophys. Res., 98(B11), 19,933-19,949, doi:10.1029/93JB02177.
38. Ritsema, J., H. J. van Heijst, and J. H. Woodhouse (2004), Global transition zone tomography, J. Geophys. Res., 109, B02302, doi:10.1029/ 2003JB002610.
39. Romanowicz, B., M. Panning, Y. Gung, and Y. Capdeville (2008), On the computation of long period seismograms in a 3D Earth using normal mode based approximations, Geophys. J. Int., 175(2), 520-536, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008. 03914.x.
40. Sieminski, A., Q. Liu, J. Trampert, and J. Tromp (2007), Finite-frequency sensitivity of surface waves to anisotropy based upon adjoint methods, Geophys. J. Int., 168, 1153-1174, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006. 03261.x. (Pubitemid 46390266)
41. Simmons, N., A. Forte, and S. Grand (2009), Joint seismic, geodynamic and mineral physical constraints on three-dimensional mantle heterogeneity: Implications for the relative importance of thermal versus compositional heterogeneity, Geophys. J. Int., 177, 1284-1304, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009. 04133.x.
42. Tromp, J., C. Tape, and Q. Liu (2005), Seismic tomography, adjoint methods, time reversal and banana-doughnut kernels, Geophys. J. Int., 160, 195-216, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02453.x. (Pubitemid 40198720)
43. Wang, Z., and F. Dahlen (1995), Spherical-spline parameterization of three-dimensional Earth models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22(22), 3099-3102, doi:10.1029/95GL03080. (Pubitemid 26462269)
44. Zhou, Y., G. Nolet, F. Dahlen, and G. Laske (2006), Global upper-mantle structure from finite-frequency surface-wave tomography, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B04304, doi:10.1029/2005JB003677. (Pubitemid 43842371)