A dynamic continuous descent approach methodology for low noise and emission

AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Alam, S ^a   Nguyen, M H ^a   Abbass, H A ^a   Lokan, C ^a   Ellejmi, M ^b   Eurocontrol, S Kirby ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b Cooperative Network Design ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE; CONCENTRIC CYLINDERS; CONFLICT FREE; CONTINUOUS DESCENT APPROACH; CONVENTIONAL APPROACH; CRUISE ALTITUDE; ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVALS; FINAL APPROACH; FLIGHT ROUTE; HIGH-FIDELITY SIMULATORS; LEVEL FLIGHT SEGMENTS; LOW NOISE; MELBOURNE; NOISE IMPACT; OVERALL SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; SYDNEY AIRPORT; TERMINAL AIRSPACE; TERMINAL AREA; THROUGHPUT CAPACITIES; TRAFFIC CONDITIONS; WAYPOINTS;

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINES; AVIONICS; FREE FLIGHT; FUELS; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; NOISE ABATEMENT; NOISE POLLUTION; OPTIMIZATION; REDUCTION;

AIRCRAFT;

EID: 78650956983     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/DASC.2010.5655502     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Donohue, G.L. and Laska, W.D. United States and European Airport Capacity Assessment using the GMU Macroscopic Capacity Model (MCM). Proc. 3rd USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar, Napoli, Italy, 2000.
2. Eurocontrol. Performance Review Report for 2006. Technical report, PRR2006, Eurocontrol, Brussels, Belgium, 2007.
3. Penner, J.E. Aviation and the Global Atmosphere. Cambridge Univ Press, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1999.
4. Black, D.A. and Black, J.A. and Issarayangyun, T. and Samuels, S.E. Aircraft noise exposure and resident's stress and hypertension: A public health perspective for airport environmental management. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(5):264--276, 2007.
5. Warren, A. and Tong, K. and Manage, B.A.T. and Seattle, W.A. Development of continuous descent approach concepts for noise abatement. Proc. 21st AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2002.
6. Melrose, A. Basic continuous descent approach. Airports and Environmental Management, EATM, 2004.
7. Wubben, F.J.M. and Busink, J.J. Environmental benefits of continuous descent approaches at Schiphol Airport compared with conventional approach procedures. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, (NLR-TP-2000-275), 2000.
8. Clarke, J.P.B. and Ho, N.T. and Ren, L. and Brown, J.A. and Elmer, K.R. and Tong, K.O. and Wat, J.K. Continuous descent approach: Design and flight test for Louisville International Airport. Journal of Aircraft, 41(5):1054--1066, 2004.
9. Eurocontrol. Single European Sky ATM Research Programme: SESAR. www.eurocontrol.int.sesar/public/subsitehomepage/homepage.html accessed 13/07/2010, 2005.
10. Concept of Operations for the Next Generation Air Transportation System ver 2.0. 2007.
11. Reynolds, H.J.D. and Reynolds, T.G. and Hansman, R.J. Human Factors Implications of Continuous Descent Approach Procedures for Noise Abatement in Air Traffic Control. Proc. 6th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Baltimore, MD, June, 2005.
12. Alam, S. and Abbass, H.A. and Barlow, M. Air Traffic Operations and Management Simulator ATOMS. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation System, 9(2):209--225, 2008.
13. Upham, P. and Maughan, J. and Raper, D. Towards Sustainable Aviation. Earthscan, 2003.
14. Schumann, U. Aircraft emissions. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, :178--186, 2002.
15. Continous Descent Approach: Implementation Guidance Information. Environmental Unit, Eurocontrol, Brussels, Belgium, 2007.
16. ICAO. Manual of Air Traffic Services Data Link Applications. ICAO, Montreal, Canada, Doc 9694-AN/955 edition, 2007.
17. FAA Aeronautical Information Manual/Federal Aviation Regulation. McGraw-Hill, 2003.
18. User Manual for Base of Aircrfat Data (BADA). Technical report, Rev No:3.6, Eurocontrol Experiment Center, Bretigny, France, 2004.
19. Pietrzko,S. and Hofmann,R. F. Mathematical modelling of aircraft noise based on identified directivity patterns. Porc. 2nd AIAA/CEAS Areoaoustics Conference, number AIAA96--1768, PA, USA, 1996.
20. Fink, R. Airframe Noise Predection Method. Technical report, FAA-RD-77-29, Federal Aviation Administration, USA, Washington, DC, 1997.
21. ICAO. ICAO Engine Exhaust Emissions Databank. Technical report, Doc 9646-AN/943, Montreal, 1995.
22. DuBois, D. and Paynter, G.C. Fuel Flow Method 2 for estimating aircraft emissions. Society of Automotive Engineers Paper, :01--1987, 2006.
23. Sutkus, D. J. and Baughcum, S. L. and DuBois, D. P. Commercial Aircraft Emission Scenario for 2020: Database Development and Analysis. Technical report, NASA/CR-2003-212331, 2003.
24. Norman, P. D. and Lister, D. H. and Lecht, M. and Madden, P. and Plaisance, C. and Renger, K. Development of the technical basis for a New Emissions Parameter covering the whole Aircraft operation: NEPAIR. Technical report, 2003.
25. Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L. and Laumanns, M. and Fonseca, C. M. and da Fonseca, V. G. Performance Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers: An Analysis and Review. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 7(2):174-188, 2003.
26. Abbass, H.A. The self-adaptive pareto differential evolution algorithm. Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC'2002), pages 831--836, 2002.
27. Air Services Australia. Designated Airsapce Handbook. Air Services Australia, Canberra, Australia, 2004.
28. Mohleji,S.D. and et.al. Curved approaches in the Netherlands: feasibility and benefits. Technical report, MTR99W99W122, MITRE, 1999.
29. Wennerberg, A. and Gibellini,M. Time Based Separation: CDG REAL-TIME SIMULATION RESULTS. Technical report, EEC Note No. 17/06, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, Bretigny, France, 2006.