Teaching several metacognitive strategies together increases students' independent metacognition

Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 277-295

  Cummins, Carrice ^a   Stewart, Margaret T ^b   Block, Cathy Collins ^c  

^a LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650943555     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613301     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
2. Baker, L. (2001). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research based practices (pp. 274-289). New York: Guilford.
3. Benson, V., & Cummins, C. (2000). The power of retelling: Developmental steps for building better comprehension. Bothell, WA: Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
4. Benson, V., & Cummins, C. (2001). Nonfiction retelling: Teaching literacy skills through informational texts [text available in conjunction with workshop of same title]. Bothell, WA: Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
5. Block, C. C. (1993). Strategy instruction in a student-centered classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 94(2), 137-153.
6. Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford.
7. Block, C. C., & Israel, S. (2004). The ABC's of performing highly effective think-alouds. The Reading Teacher, 57(2), 81-99.
8. Block, C. C., Cummins, C., & Stewart, M. T. (in preparation). How long does it take teachers and students to internalize and transfer specific combinations of comprehension processes [tentative title of qualitative analysis].
9. Brown, A. L., Collins, A., & Duguid, D. (1989). Metacognition: Effects on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 403-419.
10. Cole, S. (2000). Manatees and dugongs. Bothell, WA: Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
11. Duke, N. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202-224
12. Duke, N., & Pearson, P.D. (2002). Comprehension instruction. In A. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 103-129). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
13. Durkin, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observation reveals about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-533.
14. Fielding, L. G., & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Synthesis of research: Reading comprehension: What works? Educational Leadership, 51(5), 62-67.
15. National Reading Panel (2000). Report ofsubsection IV: Comprehension instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.
16. Pearson, D. (1985). Changing the face of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 38(8), 724-738.
17. Samuels, J. (2002). Fluency instruction. In A. Farstrup & J. Samuels (Eds.), Whatresearchhas to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 347-369). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18. Stewart, M. T. (2004). Early literacy instruction in the climate of No Child Left Behind. The Reading Teacher, 57(8), 732-753.
19. Stewart, M. T., Block, C. C., & Cummins, C. (2004, December 4). Evidence-based research: Internalization and transfer of comprehension processes. PowerPoint session presentation, National Reading Conference Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX. (Available from M. T. Stewart, LSU, EDCI, 223 Peabody Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803)
20. Trimble, S. (1994). The scripture of maps, the names of trees: A child's landscape. In G. P. Nabhan & S. Trimble (Eds.), The geography of childhood: Why children need wild places (pp. 15-32). Boston: Beacon Press.