Hooks and wires-tried and true plus how to: POSNA1-day course, april 29, 2009

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

Volumn 31, Issue 1 SUPPL., 2011, Pages

  Raney, Ellen Marie ^a  

^a SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

Author keywords

complications; hooks; instrumentation; scoliosis; sublaminar wires

Indexed keywords

NARCOTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; DYSESTHESIA; FIXATION DEVICE; HUMAN; HYPERESTHESIA; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; PARESTHESIA; PATIENT SAFETY; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL CORD INJURY; SPINE STABILIZATION; WEAKNESS; WIRE FIXATION;

ADOLESCENT; BONE SCREWS; BONE WIRES; HUMANS; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78650936217     PISSN: 02716798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181fd87b9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Luque ER. Segmental spinal instrumentation for correction of scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;163:192-198.
2. Lowe T. Morbidity and mortality committee report. Presented at the annual meeting of the scoliosis research society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1987.
3. Thompson GH, Wilber RG, Shaffer JW, et al. Segmental spinal instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. A preliminary report. Spine. 1985;10:623-630.
4. Dove J. Segmental wiring for spinal deformity. A morbidity report. Spine. 1989;14:229-231.
5. Girardi FP, Boachie-Adjei O, Rawlins BA. Safety of sublaminar wires with Isola instrumentation for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2000;25:691-695.
6. Diab M, Smith AR, Kuklo TR. Neural complications in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2007;32: 2759-2763.
7. Zindrick MR, Knight GW, Bunch WH, et al. Factors influencing the penetration of wires into the neural canal during segmental wiring. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:742-750.
8. Fujita M, Diab M, Xu Z, et al. A biomechanical analysis of sublaminar and subtransverse process fixation using metal wires and polyethylene cables. Spine. 2006;31:2202-2208
9. Been HD, Kalkman CJ, Traast HS, et al. Neurologic injury after insertion of laminar hooks during Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine. 1994;19:1402-1405.
10. Rittmeister M, Leyendecker K, Kurth A, et al. Cauda equina compression due to a laminar hook: a late complication of posterior instrumentation in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J. 1999;8:417-420.
11. Polly DW Jr, Potter BK, Kuklo T, et al. Volumetric spinal canal intrusion: a comparison between thoracic pedicle screws and thoracic hooks. Spine. 2004;29:63-69.
12. Kim Y, Bridwell K, Lenke L, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. Spine. 2005;30:2045-2050.
13. Kim Y, Lenke L, Bridwell K, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions. Spine. 2007;32: 2731-2738.
14. Hollenbeck SM, Glattes C, Asher M, et al. The prevalence of increased proximal junctional flexion following posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2008;33:1675-1681.
15. Lee G, Betz R, Clements D III, et al. Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1999;24:795-799.