Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy-quality of life 7 years after surgery

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Volumn 396, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 69-75

  Kapischke, Matthias ^d   Friedrich, Florian ^a   Hedderich, Jürgen ^c   Schulz, Tim ^b   Caliebe, Amke ^c  

^a Department of Surgery   (Germany)

^b HELIOS KLINIKUM WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Laparoscopic appendectomy; Long term results; Open appendectomy; Quality of life; SF 36

Indexed keywords

ACUTE APPENDICITIS; ADULT; APPENDECTOMY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERITONEUM ADHESION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; APPENDECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650929602     PISSN: 14352443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-010-0715-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. R Bittner 2006 Laparoscopic surgery-15 years after clinical introduction World J Surg 30 1190 1203 10.1007/s00268-005-0644-2 16816898 (Pubitemid 44078404)
2. B Bouillon HJ Kreder E Eypasch TL Holbrook R Mayou D Nast-Kolb N Pirente G Schelling T Tiling D Yates 2002 Quality of life in patients with multiple injuries-basic issues, assessment, and recommendations Restor Neurol Neurosci 20 125 134 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FjtF2lsw%3D%3D 12454361 (Pubitemid 35404346)
3. D Korolija S Sauerland S Wood-Dauphinee CC Abbou E Eypasch MG Caballero MA Lumsden B Millat JR Monson G Nilsson R Pointner W Schwenk A Shamiyeh A Szold E Targarona B Ure E Neugebauer 2004 Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Surg Endosc 18 879 897 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3ntFWmtg%3D%3D 10.1007/s00464-003-9263-x 15108103 (Pubitemid 38715998)
4. S Sauerland R Lefering EA Neugebauer 2005 Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (Cochrane Review) Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 CD001546
5. E Neugebauer H Troidl CK Kum E Eypasch M Miserez A Paul 1995 The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements-September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Surg Endosc 9 550 563 1:STN:280:DyaK2Mvgs1yhuw%3D%3D 7676385
6. V Velanovich 2004 Using quality-of-life measurements to predict patient satisfaction outcomes for antireflux surgery Arch Surg 139 621 625 10.1001/archsurg.139.6.621 15197088 discussion 626 (Pubitemid 38725070)
7. RD Matthews T Anthony LT Kim J Wang RJ Fitzgibbons Jr A Giobbie-Hurder DJ Reda KM Itani LA Neumayer 2007 Factors associated with postoperative complications and hernia recurrence for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: a report from the VA Cooperative Hernia Study Group Am J Surg 194 611 617 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.018 17936422 (Pubitemid 47538467)
8. NT Nguyen C Goldman CJ Rosenquist A Arango CJ Cole SJ Lee BM Wolfe 2001 Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs Ann Surg 234 279 289 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvotVymtA%3D%3D 10.1097/00000658-200109000-00002 11524581 discussion 289-291 (Pubitemid 32847065)
9. Y Perry AP Courcoulas HC Fernando PO Buenaventura JS McCaughan JD Luketich 2004 Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for recalcitrant gastroesophageal reflux disease in morbidly obese patients Jsls 8 19 23 14974657
10. N Katkhouda RJ Mason S Towfigh A Gevorgyan R Essani 2005 Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study Ann Surg 242 439 448 16135930 discussion 448-450
11. M Kaplan B Salman TU Yilmaz M Oguz 2009 A quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches in acute appendicitis: a randomised prospective study Acta Chir Belg 109 356 363 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MjovVaqsA%3D%3D 19943593
12. M Kapischke J Tepel K Bley 2004 Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase Langenbecks Arch Surg 389 517 523 10.1007/s00423-004-0511-x 15351885 (Pubitemid 40022450)
13. MR Cox JL McCall TG Wilson RT Padbury PL Jeans J Toouli 1993 Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a prospective analysis Aust N Z J Surg 63 840 847 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FivFOntw%3D%3D 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00357.x 8216060
14. JE Ware Jr B Gandek M Kosinski NK Aaronson G Apolone J Brazier M Bullinger S Kaasa A Leplege L Prieto M Sullivan K Thunedborg 1998 The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment J Clin Epidemiol 51 1167 1170 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5 9817134 (Pubitemid 28527172)
15. JE Ware Jr M Kosinski B Gandek NK Aaronson G Apolone P Bech J Brazier M Bullinger S Kaasa A Leplege L Prieto M Sullivan 1998 The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment J Clin Epidemiol 51 1159 1165 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00107-3 9817133 (Pubitemid 28527171)
16. D Mendoza RC Newman D Albala MS Cohen A Tewari J Lingeman M Wong L Kavoussi J Adams R Moore H Winfield JM Glascock S Das L Munch M Grasso M Dickinson R Clayman S Nakada EM McDougall IS Wolf J Hulbert RJ Leveillee A Houshair C Carson 1996 Laparoscopic complications in markedly obese urologic patients (a multi-institutional review) Urology 48 562 567 1:STN:280: DyaK2s%2FktVOnug%3D%3D 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00231-2 8886061 (Pubitemid 26357420)
17. HY Uslu AB Erkek A Cakmak I Kepenekci U Sozener FA Kocaay AG Turkcapar E Kuterdem 2007 Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17 600 603 10.1089/lap.2006.0182 17907971 (Pubitemid 47535342)
18. K Semm 1983 Endoscopic appendectomy Endoscopy 15 59 64 1:STN:280:DyaL3s3gvFClsA%3D%3D 10.1055/s-2007-1021466 6221925
19. M Kapischke A Caliebe J Tepel T Schulz J Hedderich 2006 Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review Surg Endosc 20 1060 1068 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28vhvFagug%3D%3D 10.1007/s00464-005-0016-x 16703441 (Pubitemid 44081713)
20. NT Nguyen K Zainabadi S Mavandadi M Paya CM Stevens J Root SE Wilson 2004 Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy Am J Surg 188 813 820 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.047 15619505
21. RC Ignacio R Burke D Spencer C Bissell C Dorsainvil PA Lucha 2004 Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial Surg Endosc 18 334 337 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7kvFenuw%3D%3D 10.1007/s00464-003-8927-x 14691696 (Pubitemid 38298863)
22. DC Little MD Custer BH May SE Blalock DR Cooney 2002 Laparoscopic appendectomy: an unnecessary and expensive procedure in children? J Pediatr Surg 37 310 317 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30841 11877640 (Pubitemid 34188146)
23. C Quercioli G Messina E Barbini G Carriero M Fani N Nante 2008 Importance of sociodemographic and morbidity aspects in measuring health-related quality of life: performances of three tools: comparison of three questionnaire scores Eur J Health Econ 9 9
24. P Olivares JA Tovar 1998 Laparoscopic surgery in children An Esp Pediatr 48 620 624 1:STN:280:DyaK1czislenuw%3D%3D 9662847
25. M Bullinger 1995 German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment Soc Sci Med 41 1359 1366 1:STN:280: DyaK287jtFygsw%3D%3D 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00115-N 8560303
26. M Bullinger 1996 Assessment of health related quality of life with the SF-36 Health Survey Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 35 XVII XXVII 1:STN:280: DyaK28vhsVOnsg%3D%3D quiz XXVII-XXIX
27. U Ellert BM Bellach 1999 German National Health Survey 1998-description of an update random sampling test Gesundheitswesen 61 184 190
28. REB Andersson 2001 Small bowel obstruction after appendicectomy Br J Surg 88 1387 1391 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrjt1SmsQ%3D%3D 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01869.x 11578297 (Pubitemid 32955422)
29. A Lachinski A Vingerhoets M Markuszewska-Proczko T Stefaniak 2004 Long-term quality-of-life assessment after laparoscopic and classic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 18 1152 1153 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cznvFChug%3D%3D 10.1007/s00464-003-9261-z 15136932 author reply 1154-1155
30. C Hasse H Sitter M Brune I Wollenteit C Nies M Rothmund 2002 Quality of life and patient satisfaction after reoperation for primary hyperparathyroidism: analysis of long-term results World J Surg 26 1029 1036 10.1007/s00268-002- 6664-2 12192532 (Pubitemid 36920304)
31. E Sokolovic P Buchmann F Schlomowitsch TD Szucs 2004 Comparison of resource utilization and long-term quality-of-life outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional colorectal surgery Surg Endosc 18 1663 1667 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrmtV2htA%3D%3D 15931492
32. N Nguyen K Reavis M Hinojosa BR Smith M Stamos 2009 A single-port technique for laparoscopic extended stapled appendectomy Surg Innov 13 13