Using community-based participatory approaches to mobilize communities for policy change

Family and Community Health

Volumn 34, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Wynn, Theresa A ^a   Taylor Jones, Monica M ^c   Johnson, Rhoda E ^b   Bostick, Pamela B ^d   Fouad, Mona ^a  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^d AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY   (United States)

Author keywords

advocacy; community mobilization; community based participatory research; direct action organizing; policy change; REACH 2010; socioecological model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CAPACITY BUILDING; COOPERATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; LIFESTYLE; METHODOLOGY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PASSIVE SMOKING; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; ALABAMA; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CAPACITY BUILDING; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COALITIONS; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; LIFE STYLE; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 78650924348     PISSN: 01606379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e318202ee72     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fouad MN, Nagy MC, Johnson RE, Wynn TA, Partridge EE, Dignan M. The development of a community action plan to reduce breast and cervical cancer disparities between African-American and white women. Ethn Dis. 2004;14(3)(suppl 1):S53-S60.
2. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202.
3. Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al. Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 99. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Pub. No. 04-E022-2; 2004.
4. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Imprint; 2002.
5. Vasquez VB, Lanza D, Hennessey-Lavery S, Facente S, Halpin H, Minkler M. Addressing food security through public policy action in a community-based participatory research partnership. Health Promot Pract. 2007;8(4):342-349.
6. Vazquez VB, Minkler M, Shepard P. Promoting environmental health policy through community based participatory research: a case study from Harlem, New York. J Urban Health. 2006;101-110.
7. Brownstein JN, Cheal N, Ackerman S, Bassford T, Campos-Outcalt D. Breast and cervical cancer screening in minority populations: a model for using lay health educators. J Cancer Educ. 1992;7(4):321-326.
8. Midwest Academy Intro to Direct Action Organizing. http://www.seac.org/ resources-backup/IntrotoDirectActionOrganizing.doc. Accessed November 20, 2009.
9. Wynn TA, Johnson RE, Fouad M, et al. Addressing disparities through coalition building: Alabama REACH 2010 lessons learned. J Health Care Poor Under-served. 2006;17(suppl 2):S55-S77.
10. Fouad MN, Partridge E, Dignan M, et al. A community-driven action plan to eliminate breast and cervical cancer disparity: successes and limitations. J Cancer Educ. 2006;21(suppl 1):S91-S100.
11. Nagy CM, Johnson RE, Vanderpool RC, et al. Process evaluation in action: lessons learned from Alabama REACH 2010. J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2007:2(1):63-77.
12. Lisovicz N, Wynn T, Fouad M, Partridge EE. Cancer health disparities: what we have done. Am J Med Sci. 2008;335(4):254-259.
13. Yin R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods Fourth Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Saad L. More smokers feeling harassed by smoking bans. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/28216/More-Smokers-Feeling-Harassed-Smoking-Bans. aspx. Published July 25, 2007. Accessed April 23, 2010.
15. Opinion Research Associates. http:opinionresearch assoc.com/. Accessed March 2, 2010.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tobacco Use: Targeting the Nation's Leading Killer At A Glance. http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/ resources/publications/AAG/osh.htm. Accessed November 4, 2010.
17. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2004.
18. Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights. http://www.no-smoke.org/document.php? id=397. Accessed April 23, 2010.
19. Stayner L, Bena J, Sasco, JA, et al. Lung cancer risk and workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. American Journal of Public Health. 2007;97(3):1-7.
20. American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/ SummaryUSPopList.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2010.
21. ACS Cancer Action Network. Smoke-free Alabama. Making the case for a smoke-free Alabama. http://acscan.org/action/al/campaigns/smokefreealabama/. Published 2010. Accessed February 23, 2010.
22. Bill Text AL H.B. 147 (2009). www.womeningovernment.org/files/ ALHouseBill147.pdf. Published April 30, 2009. Accessed February 20, 2010.