Visuomotor learning generalizes between bilateral and unilateral conditions despite varying degrees of bilateral interference

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 2913-2921

  Wang, Jinsung ^a   Mordkoff, J Toby ^b   Sainburg, Robert L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b E11 SSH   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROTATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650917921     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00225.2010     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bogaerts H, Buekers MJ, Zaal FT, Swinnen SP. When visuo-motor incongruence aids motor performance: The effect of perceiving motion structures during transformed visual feedback on bimanual coordination. Behav Brain Res 138: 45-57, 2003.
2. Dounskaia NV, Nogueira KG, Swinnen SP, Drummond E. Limitations on coupling of bimanual movements caused by arm dominance: When the muscle homology principle fails. J Neurophysiol 103: 2027-2038, 2010.
3. Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, McCabe G. Evidence of common timing processes in the control of manual, orofacial, and speech movements. J Mot Behav 24: 281-287, 1991.
4. Haaland KY, Schaefer SY, Knight RT, Adair J, Magalhaes A, Sadek J, Sainburg RL. Ipsilesional trajectory control is related to contralesional arm paralysis after left hemisphere damage. Exp Brain Res 196: 195-204, 2009.
5. Heuer H. Coordination. In: Handbook of Perception and Action: Motor Skills, edited by Heuer H, Keele SW. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1996, vol. 2, p. 121-180.
6. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Körding KP, Wolpert DM. Statistics of natural movements are reflected in motor errors. J Neurophysiol 102: 1902-1910, 2009.
7. Ingram HA, van Donkelaar P, Cole J, Vercher JL, Gauthier GM, Miall RC. The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task. Exp Brain Res 132: 114-126, 2000.
8. Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D. On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science 203: 1029-1031, 1979.
9. Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W. Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414: 69-73, 2001.
10. Nozaki D, Kurtzer I, Scott SH. Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb. Nat Neurosci 9: 1364-1366, 2006.
11. Redding GM, Rader SD, Lucas DR. Cognitive load and prism adaptation. J Mot Behav 24: 238-246, 1992.
12. Sainburg RL. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 142: 241-258, 2002.
13. Sainburg RL. Handedness: Differential specializations for control of trajectory and position. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 33: 206-213, 2005.
14. Sainburg RL, Kalakanis D. Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. J Neurophysiol 83: 2661-2675, 2000.
15. Sainburg RL, Wang J. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: Independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res 145: 437-447, 2002.
16. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Brain 130: 2146-2158, 2007.
17. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy [Erratum in: Neuropsychologia 48;1178 -1180;2010]. Neuropsychologia 47: 2953-2966, 2009a.
18. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL. Dissociation of initial trajectory and final position errors during visuomotor adaptation following unilateral stroke [Erratum in: Brain Res 1321;180 -181;2010]. Brain Res 1298: 78-91, 2009b.
19. Semjen A, Summers JJ, Cattaert D. Hand coordination in bimanual circle drawing. J Exp Psych Hum Percept Perform 21: 1139-1157, 1995.
20. Swinnen SP. Intermanual coordination: From behavioural principles to neural- network interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 348-359, 2002.
21. Swinnen SP, Dounskaia N, Levin O, Duysens J. Constraints during bimanual coordination: The role of direction in relation to amplitude and force requirements. Behav Brain Res 123: 201-218, 2001.
22. Swinnen SP, Walter CB. Constraints in coordinating limb movements. In: Cognition and Action in Skilled Behaviour, edited by Colley AM, Beech JR. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1988, p. 127-143.
23. Taylor JA, Thoroughman KA. Divided attention impairs human motor adaptation but not feedback control. J Neurophysiol 98: 317-326, 2007.
24. Wang J, Sainburg RL. Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations. Exp Brain Res 149: 520-526, 2003.
25. Wang J, Sainburg RL. Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions. J Neurosci 25: 4024-4030, 2005.
26. Wang J, Sainburg RL. The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance. Exp Brain Res 178: 565-570, 2007.
27. Wang J, Sainburg RL. Generalization of visuomotor learning between bilateral and unilateral conditions. J Neurophysiol 102: 2790-2799, 2009.
28. Weigelt C, Cardoso de Oliveira S. Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling. Exp Brain Res 148: 439-450, 2003.
29. Wiesendanger M, Serrien DJ. The quest to understand bimanual coordination. Prog Brain Res 143: 491-505, 2004.
30. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Thompson PA, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Blanton S, Nichols-Larsen D, Clark PC. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: The EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 7: 33-40, 2008.