Why should i use university library website resources? Discipline differences

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 9-18

  Kim, Yong Mi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650911573     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2010.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Thomsett-Scott B., May F. How may we help you? Online education faculty tell us what they need from libraries and librarians. Journal of Library Administration 2009, 49:111-135.
2. Hong W., Thong J., Wong W., Tam K.-Y. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems 2001-2002, 18:97-124.
3. Asunka S., Chae H.-S., Hughes B., Natriello G. Understanding academic information seeking habits through analysis of web server log files: the case of the teachers college library website. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2008, 35:33-45.
4. Fister B., Gilbert J., Fry A. Aggregated interdisciplinary databases and the needs of undergraduate researchers. Libraries and the Academy 2008, 8:273-292.
5. Scoyoc A., Cason C. The electronic academic library: undergraduate research behavior in a library without books. Libraries and the Academy 2006, 6:47-58.
6. Kim Y.-M. The adoption of university library website resources: a multi-group analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 978-993.
7. Nov O., Ye C. Resistance to change and the adoption of digital libraries: an integrative model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60:1702-1708.
8. Park N., Roman R., Lee S., Chung J. User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: an application of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Information Management 29 2009, 196-209.
9. Nov O., Ye C. Users' personality and perceived ease of use of digital libraries: the case for resistance to change. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59:45-851.
10. Grafstein A. A discipline-based approach to information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2002, 28:197-204.
11. Applegate R. Faculty information assignments: a longitudinal examination of variations in survey results. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2006, 32:355-363.
12. East J. Information literacy for the humanities researcher: a syllabus based on information habits research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2005, 31:134-142.
13. Heinzkill R. Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals. Library Quarterly 1980, 50:361.
14. Tiratel S.R. Accessing information use by humanists and social scientists: a study at the Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentian. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2000, 26:346-354.
15. Hammond N., Bennett C. Discipline differences in role and use of ICT to support group-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2002, 18:55-63.
16. Whitmire E. The relationship between undergraduates' background characteristics and college experiences and their academic library use. College & Research Libraries 2001, 62:528-540.
17. Hemminger B., Lu K., Vaughan K., Adams S. Information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58:2205-2225.
18. Jamali H., Nicholas D. Information-seeking behavior of physicists and astronomers. New Information Perspectives 2008, 60:444-462.
19. Gilinsky A., Robison R. A proposed design for the business capstone course with emphasis on improving students' information competency. Journal of Management Education 2008, 32:400-419.
20. King C., Frank S., Platt R. E-commerce courses: overview of nature and content. Journal of Education for Business 2001, 332-337.
21. K. Guthrie, "What do faculty think of electronic resources?" at (2001): accessed December 18th, 2009. http://www.cni.org/tfms/2004a.spring/presentations/CNI_Guthrie_What.ppt.
22. Dudley L., Davis H., McGrady D. Using an investment project to develop professional competencies in introduction to financial accounting. Journal of Education for Business 2001, 125-131.
23. Compeau D.R., Higgins C.A. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1995, 19:189-211.
24. Lam J., Lee M. Digital inclusiveness: longitudinal study of Internet adoption by older adults. Journal of Management Information Systems 2006, 22:177-206.
25. Scoyoc A., Cason C The electronic academic library: undergraduate research behavior in a library without books. Libraries and the Academy 2006, 6(1):47-58.
26. Y.-M. Kim (2010). Users' perceptions on university library website: a unifying view. Library & Information Science Research, forthcoming.
27. Education for Change Ltd., SIRU (University of Brighton), and The Research Partnership, Researchers' use of libraries and other information sources: current patterns and future trends: final report (Bristol: Research Support Libraries Group, 2002), (accessed 22 December 2009), p. 75. http://www.rslg.ac.uk/research/libuse/.
28. Carpenter J., Smith N. Discovering research resources: researchers' use of libraries and other information sources. Cultural Trends 2001, 43:1-34.
29. Culley J., Healy D., Cudd K. Business students and the university library: an overlooked element in the business curriculum. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 1977, 2:292-296.
30. Heim G., Meile L., Tease J., Glass J., Laher S., Rowan J., Comerford K. Experiential learning in a management information systems course: simulating IT consulting and CRM system procurement. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2005, 15:428-463.
31. Dewald N. What do they tell their students? Business faculty acceptance of the Web and library databases for student research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2005, 31:209-215.
32. Goel R., Straight D. Using real datasets for interdisciplinary business/economics projects. Journal of Education for Business 2005, 259-268.
33. Lombardo S.V., Miree C.E. Caught in the Web: the impact of library instruction on business students' perceptions and use of print and online resources. College & Research Libraries 2003, 64:6-22.
34. Karahanna E., Straub D.W., Chervany N.L. Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1999, 23:183-213.
35. Venkatesh V. Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1999, 23:239-260.
36. Thomsett-Scott B.C. Website usability with remote users: formal usability studies and focus groups. Journal of Library Administration 2006, 45:517-547.
37. Kim J. Task as a context of information seeking: an investigation of daily life tasks on the Web. Libri 2008, 58:172-181.
38. Borgman C., Smart L., Millwood K., Finley J., Champeny L., Gilliland A., Leazer G. Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research: implications for the design of digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2005, 56:636-657.
39. Liu Z., Yang Z-Y. Factors influencing distance-education graduate students' use of information sources: a user study. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2004, 30:24-35.
40. Maughan P.D. Library resources and services: a cross-disciplinary survey of faculty and graduate student use and satisfaction. Journal of Academic Librarianship 1999, 25:354-367.
41. Hill T., Smith N.D. Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: the case of computers. Journal of Applied psychology 1987, 72:307-313.
42. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought & Action: A Social Cognitive Theory 1986, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
43. Janes J.W. Other people's judgments: a comparison of users' and others' judgments of document relevance, topicality, and utility. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1994, 45:160-171.
44. Bowers C., Chew B., Ford C., Smith C., Herrington C. Interdisciplinary synergy: a partnership between business and library faculty and its effects on students' information literacy. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 2009, 14:110-127.
45. Swinarski M.E. Focusing on IS skills for the middle and senior level manager: a new approach to the MBA core IS course. Communication of the Association for Information Systems 2008, 23:163-178.
46. Matzat U. Disciplinary differences in the use of internet discussion groups: differential communication needs or trust problems?. Journal of Information Science 2009, 35:613-631.
47. Brown S.A., Massey A.P., Montoya-Weiss M.M., Burkman J.R. Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems 2002, 11:283-295.
48. Leonard-Barton D. Implementation characteristics of organizational innovations. Communication Research 1988, 15:603-631.
49. Lin J., Chan H., Wei K. Understanding competing application usage with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57:1338-1349.
50. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000, 46:186-204.
51. Jacoby J., O'Brian N.P. Assessing the impact of reference services provided to undergraduate students. College & Research Libraries 2005, 66:324-340.
52. Rutledge D.P., Maehler A. An assessment of library education contributions to business student learning: a case study. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship 2003, 9:3-19.
53. Marler J., Liang X., Dulebohn J. Training and effective employee information technology use. Journal of Management 2006, 32:721-743.
54. Gallivan M., Spitler V., Koufaris M. Does information technology training really matter? A social information processing analysis of coworkers' influence on IT usage in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems 2005, 22:153-192.
55. Schillewaert N., Ahearne M., Frambachc R., Moenaert R. The adoption of information technology in the sales force. Industrial Marketing Management 2005, 34:323-336.
56. Taylor K., Corrall S. Personalized service? Changing the role of the government librarian. Journal of Information Science 2007, 33:298-314.
57. Glynn T., Wu C. New roles and opportunities for academic library liaisons: a survey and recommendations. Reference Services Review 2003, 31:122-128.
58. Frank D.G., Raschke G.K., Wood J., Yang J.Z. Information consulting: the key to success in academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2001, 27:90-96.
59. Donham J., Green C.W. Developing a culture of collaboration: librarian as consultant. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2004, 30:314-321.
60. Hallman C. Technology: trigger for change in reference librarianship. Journal of Academic Librarianship 1990, 16:204-208.
61. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations 1995, Free Press, New York. 4th ed.
62. I. Ajzen, "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, (1991): 179-211. p. 188.
63. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior 1980, PreWntice-Hall, New Jersey.
64. Karahanna E., Straub D.W., Chervany N.L. Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1999, 23:183-213.
65. Hartwick J., Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science 1994, 40:440-465.
66. Castañeda A., Munoz-Leiva F., Luque T. Web Acceptance Model (WAM): modeling effects of user experience. Information & Management 2007, 44:384-396.
67. Haglund L., Olsson P. The impact on university libraries of changes in information behavior among academic researchers: a multiple case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2008, 34:52-59.
68. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior 1980, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
69. Hu P., Clark T., Ma W. Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study. Information and Management 2003, 41:227-241.
70. Heinrichs J., Lim K.S., Lim J.S., Spangenberg M. Determining factors of academic library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58:2325-2334.
71. Kim J.-A. Toward an understanding of Web-based subscription database acceptance. The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57:1715-1728.
72. Palmer J. Website usability, design and performance criteria. Information Systems Research 2002, 13:150-167.
73. Nadkarni S., Gupta R. A task-based model of perceived Website complexity. Management Information Quarterly 2007, 31:501-524.
74. Schaik P., Ling J. Design parameters of rating scales for web sites. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 2007, 14:1-35.
75. Harpel-Burke P. Library homepage design at medium-sized universities: a comparison to commercial homepages via Nielsen and Tahir. Library Homepage Design 2005, 21:193-208.
76. Vakkari P. Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on scholarly work and publication productivity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59:602-612.
77. Jiao Q., Onwuegbuzie A. Identifying library anxiety through students' learning-modality preferences. Library Quarterly 1999, 69:202-216.
78. Adkins D., Esser L. Literature and technology skills for entry-level children's librarians: What employers want. Children and Libraries 2004, 2:14-21.
79. Tarafdar M., Zhang J. Determinants of reach and loyalty: a study of website performance and implications for Website design. Journal of Computer Information Systems 2008, 16-24.
80. Burton-Jones A., Hubona G. Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption. Database for Advances in Information Systems 2005, 36:58-77.
81. Kim Y.-M. Validation of psychometric research instruments: the case of information science. The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60:1178-1191.