Measuring inequality using censored data: A multiple-imputation approach to estimation and inference

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society

Volumn 174, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 63-81

  Jenkins, Stephen P ^a   Burkhauser, Richard V ^b   Feng, Shuaizhang ^c   Larrimore, Jeff ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Censored data; Current Population Survey; Generalized beta of the second kind distribution; Income inequality; Multiple imputation; Top coding

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650907459     PISSN: 09641998     EISSN: 1467985X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00655.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. An, D. and Little, R. J. A. (2007) Multiple imputation: an alternative to top coding for statistical disclosure control. J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 170, 923-940.
2. Angle, J. and Tolbert, C. (1999) Topcodes and the great U-Turn in nonmetro/metro wage and salary income inequality. Staff Report 9904. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
3. Atkinson, A. B. (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theor., 2, 244-263.
4. Atkinson, A. B. and Piketty, T. (eds) (2007) Top Incomes over the Twentieth Century: a Contrast between European and English-speaking Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Atkinson, A. B., Rainwater, L. and Smeeding, T. M. (1995) Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
6. Autor, D., Katz, L. and Kearney, M. (2008) Trends in U.S. wage inequality: revising the revisionists. Rev. Econ. Statist., 90, 300-323.
7. Bandourian, R., McDonald, J. B. and Turley, R. S. (2003) A comparison of parametric models of income distribution across countries and over time. Estadistica, 55, 135-152.
8. Barrett, G. and Donald, S. G. (2003) Consistent tests for stochastic dominance. Econometrica, 71, 71-104.
9. Beach, C. M. and Richmond, J. (1985) Joint confidence intervals for income shares and Lorenz curves. Int. Econ. Rev., 26, 439-450.
10. Biewen, M. and Jenkins, S. P. (2005) svygei_svyatk: Stata modules to derive the sampling variances of Generalized Entropy and Atkinson inequality indices when estimated from complex survey data. In Statistical Software Components Archive S453601. (Available from.)
11. Biewen, M. and Jenkins, S. P. (2006) Variance estimation for Generalized Entropy and Atkinson inequality indices: the complex survey data case. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Statist., 68, 371-383.
12. Bishop, J. A., Chiou, J.-R. and Formby, J. P. (1994) Truncation bias and the ordinal evaluation of income inequality. J. Bus. Econ. Statist., 12, 123-127.
13. Bishop, J. A., Formby, J. P. and Smith, W. J. (1991a) International comparisons of income inequality: tests for Lorenz dominance across nine countries. Economica, 58, 461-477.
14. Bishop, J. A., Formby, J. P. and Smith, W. J. (1991b) Lorenz dominance and welfare: changes in the U.S. distribution of income, 1967-1986. Rev. Econ. Statist., 73, 134-139.
15. Bordley, R. F., McDonald, J. B. and Mantrala, A. (1996) Something new, something old: parametric models for the size distribution of income. J. Income Distribn, 6, 91-103.
16. Brachmann, K., Stich, A. and Trede, M. (1996) Evaluating parametric income distribution models. Allg. Statist. Arch., 80, 285-298.
17. Burkhauser, R. V., Feng, S. and Jenkins, S. P. (2009) Using the P90/P10 ratio to measure US inequality trends with Current Population Survey data: a view from inside the Census Bureau vaults. Rev. Incme Wlth, 55, 166-185.
18. Burkhauser, R. V., Feng, S., Jenkins, S. P. and Larrimore, J. (2008) Estimating trends in US income inequality using the Current Population Survey: the importance of controlling for censoring. J. Econ. Inqualty, to be published.
19. Burkhauser, R. V. and Larrimore, J. (2009) Trends in the relative economic well being of working-age men with disabilities: correcting the record using internal Current Population Survey data. J. Disablty Poly Stud., 20, 162-169.
20. Cowell, F. A. (2000) Measurement of inequality. In Handbook of Income Distribution (eds A. B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon), pp. 87-166. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
21. Cowell, F. A. and Victoria-Feser, M.-P. (1996) Robustness properties of inequality measures. Econometrica, 64, 77-101.
22. Danziger, S. and Gottschalk, P. (1995) America Unequal. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
23. Davidson, R. and Duclos, J.-Y. (2000) Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of inequality and poverty. Econometrica, 68, 1435-1464.
24. Fichtenbaum, R. and Shahidi, H. (1988) Truncation bias and the measurement of income inequality. J. Bus. Econ. Statist., 6, 335-337.
25. Foster, J. E. (1985) Inequality measurement. In Fair Allocation: Proc. Symp. Applied Mathematics (ed. H. P. Young), pp. 31-68. Providence: American Mathematical Society.
26. Gartner, H. and Rässler, S. (2005) Analyzing the changing gender wage gap based on multiply imputed right censored wages. Discussion Paper 5/2005. Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg. (Available from.)
27. Gottschalk, P. and Danziger, S. (2005) Inequality of wage rates, earnings and family income in the United States, 1975-2002. Rev. Incme Wlth, 51, 231-254.
28. Jenkins, S. P. (2006) svylorenz: Stata module to derive distribution-free variance estimates from complex survey data of quantile group shares of a total, and cumulative quantile group shares. In Statistical Software Components Archive S456602. (Available from.)
29. Jenkins, S. P. (2009) Distributionally-sensitive inequality indices and the GB2 income distribution. Rev. Incme Wlth, 55, 392-398.
30. Jenkins, S. P., Burkhauser, R. V., Feng, S. and Larrimore, J. (2009) Measuring inequality using censored data: a multiple imputation approach. Working Paper 2009-04. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester. (Available from.)
31. Kahn, L. M. (1998) Collective bargaining and the interindustry wage structure: international evidence. Economica, 65, 507-534.
32. Katz, L. F. and Murphy, K. M. (1992) Changes in relative wages, 1963-87: supply and demand factors. Q. J. Econ., 107, 35-78.
33. Kleiber, C. and Kotz, S. (2003) Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences. Hoboken: Wiley.
34. Kovacevic, M. S. and Binder, D. A. (1997) Variance estimation for measures of income inequality and polarization. J. Off. Statist., 13, 41-58.
35. Larrimore, J., Burkhauser, R. V., Feng, S. and Zayatz, L. (2008) Consistent cell means for topcoded incomes in the public use March CPS (1976-2007). J. Econ. Socl Measmnt, 33, 89-122.
36. Lemieux, T. (2006) Increasing residual wage inequality: composition effects, noisy data, or rising demand for skill? Am. Econ. Rev., 96, 461-498.
37. Manski, C. F. (2003) Partial Identification of Probability Distributions. New York: Springer.
38. McDonald, J. B. (1984) Some generalized functions for the size distribution of income. Econometrica, 52, 647-663.
39. Piketty, T. and Saez, E. (2003) Income inequality in the United States, 1913-1998. Q. J. Econ., 118, 1-39.
40. Reiter, J. P. (2003) Inference for partially synthetic, public use microdata sets. Surv. Methodol., 29, 181-188.
41. Rubin, D. B. (1987) Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.
42. Ryscavage, P. (1995) A surge in growing income inequality? Mnthly Lab. Rev., 118, Aug., 51-61.
43. Schluter, C. and Trede, M. (2002) Tails of Lorenz curves. J. Econmetr., 109, 151-166.
44. StataCorp. (2007) Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station: StataCorp.
45. US Census Bureau (2009) Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2008. Washington DC: Government Printing Office. (Available from.)