Multi-feature matching of fresco fragments

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Toler Franklin, Corey ^a   Brown, Benedict ^b   Weyrich, Tim ^c   Funkhouser, Thomas ^a   Rusinkiewicz, Szymon ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D MATCHING; 3D SHAPE MATCHING; ARCHAEOLOGICAL ARTIFACTS; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; DATA QUALITY; DATA SETS; DISCRIMINABILITY; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; FEATURE DESCRIPTORS; FEATURE MATCHING; MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES; MATCHING PROBLEMS; NORMAL MAPS; PREDICTION RATE; RETRIEVAL PERFORMANCE; TEXTURE SYNTHESIS;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; MESH GENERATION; ROUGH SET THEORY; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

COLOR MATCHING;

EID: 78650902371     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: 15577368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1866158.1866207     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. BROWN, B. J., TOLER-FRANKLIN, C., NEHAB, D., BURNS, M., DOBKIN, D., VLACHOPOULOS, A., DOUMAS, C., RUSINKIEWICZ, S., AND WEYRICH, T. 2008. A System for High-Volume Acquisition and Matching of Fresco Fragments: Reassembling Theran Wall Paintings. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), Vol. 27, No. 3 (Aug.).
2. FORNASIER, M., AND TONIOLO, D. 2005. Fast, robust and ef- ficient 2D pattern recognition for re-assembling fragmented images. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 38, No. 11 (Nov).
3. HUANG, Q.-X., FLÖRY, S., GELFAND, N., HOFER, M., AND POTTMANN, H. 2006. Reassembling Fractured Objects by Geometric Matching. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), Vol. 25, No. 3.
4. KARASIK, A., AND SMILANSKY, U. 2007. 3D scanning technology as a standard archaeological tool for pottery analysis: practice and theory. Journal of Archaeological Science.
5. KOLLER, D., TRIMBLE, J., NAJBJERG, T., GELFAND, N., AND LEVOY, M. 2006. Fragments of the City: Stanford's Digital Forma Urbis Romae Project. In Proceedings of the Third Williams Symposium on Classical Architecture, Journal of Roman Archaeology, vol. Suppl. 61, 237-252.
6. KONG, W., AND KIMIA, B. 2001. On Solving 2D and 3D Puzzles under Curve Matching. CVPR, Vol. 2, No. 10 (aug), 583.
7. LEITÃO, H. C. G., AND STOLFI, J. 2002. AMultiscaleMethod for the Reassembly of Two-Dimensional Fragmented Objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 24, No. 9 (Sept.), 1239-1251.
8. MANAY, S., YEZZI, A. J., HONG, B. W., AND SOATTO, S. 2004. Integral Invariant Signatures. In Proc. ECCV, 87-99.
9. PAPAODYSSEUS, C., PANAGOPOULOS, T., EXARHOS, M., TRIANTAFILLOU, C., FRAGOULIS, D., AND DOUMAS, C. 2002. Contour-Shape Based Reconstruction of Fragmented, 1600 BC Wallpaintings. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, Vol. 50, No. 6.
10. PINTUS, R., MALZBENDER, T., WANG, O., BERGMAN, R., NACHLIELI, H., AND RUCKENSTEIN, G. 2009. Photo Repair and 3D Structure from Flatbed Scanners. In Proc. VISAPP.
11. QUINLAN, J. R. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann.
12. SAǦIRǑG LU, M. Ş., AND ERÇIL, A. 2006. A Texture Based Matching Approach for Automated Assembly of Puzzles. In ICPR '06: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1036-1041.
13. SERRA, J. 1983. Image Analysis and Mathermatical Morphology. Academic Press.
14. WILLIS, A. 2004. Stochastic 3D Geometric Models for Classification, Deformation, and Estimation. Ph.D. Thesis (may).