The importance of effect sizes in the interpretation of research. Primer on research: Part 3

ASHA Leader

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2006, Pages

  Schuele, C Melanie ^a   Justice, Laura M ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650890785     PISSN: 10859586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. American Psychological Association (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
2. Casby, M. (2001). Otitis media and language development: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 65-80.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Law, J., Garrett, Z., & Nye, C. (2005). The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 924-943.
5. Norman, G., & Streiner, D. (2003). PDQ statistics. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker.
6. Thompson, B. (2002a). Statistical, Practical, and Clinical: How many kinds of significance to counselors need to consider? Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 64-71.
7. Thompson, B. (2002b). What future quantitative social science research could look like: Confidence intervals for effect sizes. Educational Researcher, 31(3), 25-32.
8. Vacha-Haase, T., & Thompson, B. (2004). How to estimate and interpret various effect sizes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 473-481.