Information access to historical documents from the early new high german period

Proceedings of IJCAI 2007 Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data, AND 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 147-154

  Hauser, Andreas ^a   Heller, Markus ^a   Leiss, Elisabeth ^a   Schulz, Klaus U ^a   Wanzeck, Christiane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Approximate matching; Early new high german; Historical documents; Historical language; Information access; Information retrieval; Word similarity

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATE MATCHING; HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS; HISTORICAL LANGUAGE; INFORMATION ACCESS; NEW HIGH; WORD SIMILARITY;

HISTORY;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 78650889264     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. [Archer et al., 2006] Dawn Archer, Andrea Ernst-Gerlach, Sebastian Kempken, Thomas Pilz, and Paul Rayson. The identification of spelling variants in english and german historical texts: manual or automatic? In Conference Abstracts: Digital Humanities 2006. Paris - Sorbonne, July 5th - 9th 2006., pages 3-5. Association for Digital Humanities Organisation, 2006.
2. [Brill and Moore, 2000] Eric Brill and Robert C. Moore. An improved error model for noisy channel spelling correction. In ACL '00: Proceedings of the 38th AnnualMeeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 286- 293, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2000. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. [Erben, 2000] Johannes Erben. Syntax des Fr̈uhneuhochdeutschen, pages 1584-1593. Stefan Sonderegger, Berlin, New York, second edition, 2000.
4. [Ernst-Gerlach and Fuhr, 2006] Andrea Ernst-Gerlach and Norbert Fuhr. Generating search term variants for text collections with historic spellings. In 28th European Conference on Information Retrieval Research (ECIR 2006), 2006.
5. [Gatos et al., 2005] Basilios Gatos, Thomas Konidaris, Kostas Ntzios, Ioannis Pratikakis, and Stavros J. Perantonis. A segmentation-free approach for keyword search in historical typewritten documents. In ICDAR, pages 54-58. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
6. [Kukich, 1992] Karen Kukich. Techniques for automatically correcting words in texts. ACM Computing Surveys pages 377-439 1992.
7. [Mihov and Schulz, 2004] Stoyan Mihov and Klaus U. Schulz. Fast approximate search in large dictionaries. Computational Linguistics, 30(4):451-477, December 2004.
8. [Pilz et al., 2006] Thomas Pilz, Wolfram Luther, Norbert Fuhr, and Ulrich Ammon. Rule-based search in text databaseswith nonstandard orthography. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 21(2):179-186, 2006.
9. [Rath et al., 2004] Toni M. Rath, R. Manmatha, and Victor Lavrenko. A search engine for historical manuscript images. In Mark Sanderson, Kalervo J̈arvelin, James Allan, and Peter Bruza, editors, SIGIR, pages 369-376. ACM, 2004.
10. [Rayson et al., 2005] Paul Rayson, Dawn Archer, and Nick Smith. VARD versus Word. A comparison of the UCREL variant detector and modern spell checkers on English historic corpora. In Proc. of the Corpus Linguistics 2005 Conference, conference series on-line e-journal, vol. 1, Birmingham, UK, 2005.
11. [Ringlstetter et al., 2006] C. Ringlstetter, K. U. Schulz, and S. Mihov. Orthographic errors in web pages - towards cleaner web corpora. Computational Linguistics, 2006. to appear.
12. [Ristad and Yianilos, 1997] Eric Sven Ristad and Peter N. Yianilos. Learning string edit distance. In Proc. 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 287- 295. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.
13. [Schnell and Bachteler, 2004] Rainer Schnell and Tobias Bachteler. A toolbox for record linkage. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 33(1&2):125-133, 2004.
14. [Schulz and Mihov, 2002] Klaus U. Schulz and Stoyan Mihov. Fast String Correction with Levenshtein-Automata. International Journal of Document Analysis and Recognition, 5(1):67-85, 2002.
15. [Stockmann-Hovekamp, 1991] Christina Stockmann- Hovekamp. Untersuchungen zur Druckersprache in den Flugschriften Martin Bucers. Carl Winter, Universit ̈atsverlag, Heidelberg, 1991.
16. [Strohmaier et al., 2003] C. Strohmaier, C. Ringlstetter, K. U. Schulz, and S. Mihov. A visual and interactive tool for optimizing lexical postcorrection of OCR results. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Document Image Analysis and Recognition, DIAR'03, 2003.
17. [Strunk, 2003] Jan Strunk. Information retrieval for languages that lack a fixed orthography. Technical report, Linguistics Department, Stanford University, 2003.
18. [Taghva and Stofsky, 2001] Kazem Taghva and Eric Stofsky. OCRSpell: an interactive spelling correction system for OCR errors in text. International Journal of Document Analysis and Recognition, 3:125-137, 2001.
19. [Wegera and Prell, 2000] Klaus-Peter Wegera and Hans- Peter Prell. Wortbildung des Fr̈uhneuhochdeutschen, pages 1594-1605. Stefan Sonderegger, Berlin, New York, second edition, 2000.
20. Fr̈uhneuhochdeutschen, pages 1532-1554. Stefan Sonderegger, Berlin, New York, second edition, 2000.
21. [Weigel et al., 2004] Felix Weigel, Holger Meuss, François Bry, and Klaus U. Schulz. Content-Aware DataGuides: Interleaving IR and DB Indexing Techniques for Efficient Retrieval of TextualXML Data. In Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR), pages 378-393, 2004.
22. [Wolf, 2000] Dieter Wolf. Lexikologie und Lexikographie des Fr̈uhneuhochdeutschen, pages 1554-1584. Stefan Sonderegger, Berlin, New York, second edition, 2000.
23. [Zobel and Dart, 1995] Justin Zobel and Philip Dart. Finding approximatematches in large lexicons. Software-Practice and Experience, 25(3):331-345, 1995.