Sparse coding for drum sound classification and its use as a similarity measure

MML'10 - Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Machine Learning and Music, Co-located with ACM Multimedia 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 9-12

  Scholler, Simon ^a,b   Purwins, Hendrik ^b  

^a BERNSTEIN CENTER FOR COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE   (Germany)

^b Music Technology Group   (Spain)

Author keywords

Audio recognition; Matching pursuit; Sparse coding

Indexed keywords

AUDIO CLASSIFICATION; AUDIO-RECOGNITION; BASIS FUNCTIONS; BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; DATABASE TRANSFER; EQUAL ENERGY; FEATURE REPRESENTATION; FEATURE SPACE; FREQUENCY RESOLUTIONS; MATCHING PURSUIT; SIMILARITY MEASURE; SOUND CLASSIFICATION; SOUND DISTRIBUTIONS; SOUND RECOGNITION; SPARSE CODING; TEMPORAL REPRESENTATIONS; TRADE-OFF PROBLEM; TWO-STEP PROCESS;

FEATURE EXTRACTION; INSTRUMENTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

AUDIO ACOUSTICS;

EID: 78650877126     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1878003.1878007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5-32, 2001.
2. S. Chu, S. Narayanan, and C.C.J. Kuo. Environmental sound recognition with time-frequency audio features. Trans. Audio, Speech and Lang. Proc., 17(6):1142-1158, 2009.
3. O. Gillet and G. Richard. Enst-drums: an extensive audio-visual database for drum signals processing. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2006), pages 156-159, 2006.
4. M. Goto, H. Hashiguchi, T. Nishimura, and R. Oka. RWC music database: Music genre database and musical instrument sound database. In Proc. ISMIR, pages 229-230, 2003.
5. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I.H. Witten. The WEKA data mining software: An update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 11(1):10-18, 2009.
6. M. Helén and T. Virtanen. Separation of drums from polyphonic music using non-negative matrix factorization and support vector machine. In Proc. EUSIPCO, volume 2005, 2005.
7. S.G. Mallat and Z. Zhang. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 41(12):3397-3415, 1993.
8. P. Manzagol, T. Bertin-Mahieux, D. Eck, et al. On the use of sparse time-relative auditory codes for music. In Proc. International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR). Philadelphia, PA: ISMIR, pages 14-18, 2008.
9. M.D. Plumbley, S.A. Abdallah, T. Blumensath, and M.E. Davies. Sparse representations of polyphonic music. Signal Processing, 86(3):417-431, 2006.
10. M. Slaney. Auditory toolbox version 2. Interval Research Corporation, 10:1998, 1998.
11. E. Smith and M.S. Lewicki. Efficient coding of time-relative structure using spikes. Neural Computation, 17(1):19-45, 2005.
12. E.C. Smith and M.S. Lewicki. Efficient auditory coding. Nature, 439(7079):978-982, 2006.