The informatics of indoor and outdoor space: A research agenda

ISA 2010 - Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 47-53

  Giudice, Nicholas A ^a   Walton, Lisa A ^a   Worboys, Michael ^a  

^a University of Maine   (United States)

Author keywords

Formal models; Indoor space; Indoor outdoor space

Indexed keywords

DATA MODELS; FORMAL MODEL; FUNCTIONAL MODEL; INDOOR SPACE; INFORMATICS; NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATIONS; OUTDOOR SPACE; RESEARCH AGENDA; SPATIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SPATIALIZATION;

INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RESEARCH;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 78650859967     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1865885.1865897     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Ünlü, A., Edgü, E., Cimsit, F., Salgamcioglu, M., Garip, E., Mansouri, A. 2009. Interface of indoor and outdoor spaces in buildings. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm: KTH.
2. Cheng, K. 1986. A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149-178.
3. Gallistel, CR. 1990.The organization of learning. Learning, development, and conceptual change (USA) - MIT Press.
4. Hermer, L., and Spelke, S. S. 1994. A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature, 370, 57-59.
5. Benhamou, S, and Pocet, B. 1998. Landmark use by navigating rats (Rattus norvegicus) contrasting geometric and featural information - Journal of Comparative Psychology. 112(3):317-322.
6. Milner, R. 2009. The Space and Motion of Communicating Agents. 1st. Cambridge University Press.
7. http://protege.stanford.edu/overview/
8. http://www.ifomis.org/bfo
9. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., and Patel-Schneider, P. editors. 2003. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press.
10. Grenon, P., and Smith, B. 2004. SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology. Spatial Cognition & Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 4(1):69-104.
11. U.S.G.S.A. 2007. GSA Building Information Modeling Guide Series: 02 - GSA BIM Guide for Spatial Program Validation. P. B. Service.
12. Howell, I. and Batcheler, B. 2005. Building Information Modeling Two Years Later - Huge Potential, Some Success and Several Limitations. The Laiserin Letter.
13. Montello, D. R. and Sas, C. 2006. Human factors of wayfinding in navigation. In W. Karwowski(Ed.) International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors, 2nd ed. pp. 2003-2008. London: CRC Press: Taylor and Francis, Ltd.
14. Molenaar, M. 1990. A formal data structure for 3D vector maps, in: Proceedings of EGIS'90, Vol. 2, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 770-781.
15. Pilouk, M. 1996, Integrated modeling for 3D GIS, PhD thesis, ITC, The Netherlands.
16. Carlson, E. 1987. Three dimensional conceptual modeling of subsurface structures. In: ASPRS-ACSM Annual Convention, pp. 188-200. Baltimore, MD.
17. Kim, J., Kang, H., and Ki-Joune, L. 2009. Topology of the Prism Model for 3D Indoor Spatial Objects, Proc. First International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness,Taipei, Taiwan, May 18.
18. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building-Information-Modeling
19. Goldberg, E. 2005. State of the AEC Industry: BIM, slow but inevitable. CADalyst.
20. Cox, S., Daisy, P., Lake, R., Portele, C., and Whiteside, A. 2004. OpenGIS Geography Markup Language (GML 3.1), Implementation Specification Version 3.1.0, Recommendation Paper, OGC Doc. No. 03-105r1.
21. Kolbe, T., Goger, G., and Plumer, L. 2005. CityGML: Interoperable Access to 3D City Models. Geo-information for Disaster Management, pp. 883-899. Springer Berlin Heildelberg. ISBN 978-3-540-24988-7.
22. http://u-indoor.org/
23. Lee, J. 2004. 3D GIS for Geo-coding Human Activity in Micro-scale Urban Environments. In: M.J. Egenhofer, C. Freksa, and H.J. Miller (Eds.): GIScience 2004, pp. 162-178. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
24. Lee, Y., and Zlatanova, S. 2008. A 3D data model and topological analyses for emergency response in urban areas. Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response. Zlatanova and Li (eds), Taylor and Francis Group, London, UK.
25. Becker, T., C. Nagel and T. Kolbe. 2009. Supporting Contexts for Indoor Navigation Using a Multilayered Space Model, Proc. First International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness, Taipei, Taiwan, May 18.
26. Montello, D. R. 2005. Navigation. In P. Shah and A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Visiospatial Thinking. pp. 257-294. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Thorndyke, P. W., and Hayes-Roth, B. 1982. Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560-589.
28. Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., and Hegarty, M. 1999. Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory and Cognition, 27(4), 741-750.
29. Wiener, J. M., Büchner, S. J., and Hölscher, C. 2009. Taxonomy of human wayfinding tasks: A knowledge-based approach. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 9(2), 152-165.
30. Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., and Jones, D. M. 1997.Navigating buildings in "desk-top" virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3(2), 143-159.
31. Stankiewicz, B. J., and Kalia, A. A. 2007. Acquisition of structural versus object landmark knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(2), 378-390