64-slice MDCT angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 69-77

  Wasinrat, Jitladda ^a   Siriapisith, Thanongchai ^a   Thamtorawat, Somrach ^a   Tongdee, Trongtum ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

angiography; cardiovascular CT; CT angiography; digital subtraction; end stage renal disease; hemodialysis access; MDCT angiography; vascular stenosis

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR ROW COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; PERIPHERAL VEIN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENOSIS; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR ACCESS STENOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT, SURGICAL; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RENAL DIALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; THAILAND; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY; VENOUS THROMBOSIS;

EID: 78650849721     PISSN: 15385744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1538574410379922     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gibbons CP Primary vascular access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 ; 31 (5). 523-529.
2. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K., Hurwich BJ Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Eng J Med. 1966 ; 275 (20). 1089-1092.
3. Rooijens PP, Tordoir JH, Stijnen T., Burgmans JP, Smet de AA, Yo TI Radiocephalic wrist arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: meta-analysis indicates a high primary failure rate. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 ; 28 (6). 583-589.
4. Doelman C., Duijm LE, Liem YS, et al. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Surg. 2005 ; 42: 739-746.
5. Dumars MC, Thompson WE, Bluth EI, Lindberg JS, Yoselevitz M., Merritt CR Management of suspected hemodialysis graft dysfunction: usefulness of diagnostic US. Radiology. 2002 ; 222 (1). 103-107.
6. Froger CL, Duijm LE, Liem YS, et al. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts. Radiology. 2005 ; 234 (1). 284-291.
7. Verdun FR, Bochud F., Gundinchet F., Aroua A., Schnyder P., Meuli R. Quality initiatives* radiation risk: what you should know to tell your patient. Radiographics. 2008 ; 28 (7). 1807-1816.
8. Tessitore N., Mansueto G., Bedogna V., et al. A prospective controlled trial on effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on functioning arteriovenous fistulae survival. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 ; 14 (6). 1623-1627.
9. Cavagna E., D'Andrea P., Schiavon F., Tarroni G. Failing hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula and percutaneous treatment: imaging with CT, MRI and digital subtraction angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000 ; 23 (4). 262-265.
10. Lin YP, Wu MH, Ng YY, et al. Spiral computed tomographic angiography-a new technique for evaluation of vascular access in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 1998 ; 18 (2). 117-122.
11. Ye C., Mao Z., Rong S., et al. Multislice computed tomographic angiography in evaluating dysfunction of the vascular access in hemodialysis patients. Nephron Clin Pract. 2006 ; 104 (2). c94 - c100.
12. Heye S., Maleux G., Claes K., Kuypers D., Oyen R. Stenosis detection in native hemodialysis fistulas with MDCT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 ; 192 (4). 1079-1084.
13. Hernandez D., Diaz F., Rufino M., et al. Subclavian vascular access stenosis in dialysis patients: natural history and risk factors. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998 ; 9 (8). 1507-10.
14. Smits JH, Bos C., Elgersma OE, et al. Hemodialysis access imaging: comparison of flow-interrupted contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2002 ; 225 (3). 829-834.
15. Dawson P. Contrast agents in patients on dialysis. Semin Dial. 2002 ; 15 (4). 232-236.
16. Nyman U., Elmstahl B., Leander P., Nilsson M., Golman K., Almen T. Are gadolinium-based contrast media really safer than iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in patients with azotemia? Radiology. 2002 ; 223 (2). 311-318 ; discussion 328-329.
17. Broome DR, Girguis MS, Baron PW, Cottrell AC, Kjellin I., Kirk GA Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 ; 188 (2). 586-92.
18. Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998 ; 8 (6). 1228-1235.
19. Rooijens PP, Serafino GP, Vroegindeweij D., et al. Multi-slice computed tomographic angiography for stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Access. 2008 ; 9 (4). 278-84.
20. Patane D., Morale W., Malfa P., et al. [Multislice computed tomographic angiography in the assessment of central veins for endovascular treatment planning: comparison with phlebography.] G Ital Nefrol. 2010 ; 27 (1). 69-77.