Property value impacts of hemlock woolly adelgid in residential forests

Forest Science

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 529-540

  Holmes, Thomas P ^a   Murphy, Elizabeth A ^b   Bell, Kathleen P ^c   Royle, Denise D ^d  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^d NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hedonic analysis; Invasive species; Spatial econometrics

Indexed keywords

BIAS ESTIMATE; CROSS-SECTION MODELS; DIFFERENCE MODELS; ECONOMIC LOSS; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; FIXED-EFFECTS; FOREST INSECTS; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; HEDONIC PRICE MODEL; HEMLOCK RESOURCE; HEMLOCK WOOLLY ADELGID; HOUSING CHARACTERISTIC; IMAGE DIFFERENCING; INVASIVE SPECIES; LAND USE AND LAND COVER; NEW JERSEY; NON-INDIGENOUS; PANEL DATA MODELS; PROPERTY VALUE; PROPERTY VALUE IMPACTS; REGRESSION MODEL; REMOTE SENSING DATA; SPATIAL DEPENDENCE; SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS; SPATIAL ERRORS; SPILLOVER EFFECTS;

REFORESTATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

ADELGES; ADELGIDAE; CONIUM; HEXAPODA; TSUGA;

EID: 78650843211     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Acharya, G., and L.L. Bennett. 2001. Valuing open space and land use patterns in urban watersheds. J. Real Estate Finan. Econ. 22(2/3):221-237.
2. Anderson, L.M., and H.K. Cordell. 1988. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.): A survey based on actual sales prices. Landsc. Urban Plan. 15(1):153-164.
3. Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 304 p.
4. Anselin, L., I. Syabri, and Y. Kho. 2006. GeoDa: An introduction to spatial data analysis. Geog. Anal. 38(1):5-22.
5. Aukema, J., D.G. McCullough, B. Von Holle, A. Liebhold, K. Britton, and S. Frankel. 2010. Temporal accumulation of nonindigenous forest pests in the continental U.S. Working Paper, National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, CA. 24 p.
6. Bell, K.P., and N.E. Bockstael. 2000. Applying the generalized- moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving microlevel data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 82(1):72-82.
7. Benson, E.D., J.L. Hansen, A.L. Schwartz, and G.T. Smersh. 1998. Pricing residential amenities: The value of a view. J. Real Estate Finan. Econ. 16(1):55-73.
8. Brockerhoff, E.G., J. Bain, M. Kimberley, and M. Knícek. 2006. Interception frequency of exotic bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) and relationship with establishment in New Zealand and worldwide. Can. J. For. Res. 36:289-298.
9. Brush, R.O. 1979. The attractiveness of woodlands: Perceptions of forest landowners in Massachusetts. For. Sci. 25(4):495-506.
10. Dombrow, J.M.R., and C.F. Sirmans. 2000. The market value of mature trees in single-family housing markets. Appr. J. 68(1):39-43.
11. Donovan, G.H., P.A. Champ, and D.T. Butry. 2007. Wildfire risk and housing prices: A case study from Colorado Springs. Land Econ. 83(2):217-233.
12. Garrod, G., and K. Willis. 1992. The amenity value of woodland in Great Britain: A comparison of economic estimates. Environ. Res. Econ. 2(4):415-434.
13. General Accounting Office. 2006. Invasive forest pests: Lessons learned from three recent infestations may aid in managing future efforts. General Accounting Office, Washington DC. 118 p.
14. Geoghegan, J. 2002. The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy 1991(1):91-98.
15. Geoghegan, J., Wainger, L.A., and N.E. Bockstael. 1997. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecol. Econ. 23(2):251-264.
16. Greene, W.H. 1997. Econometric analysis. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 1075 p.
17. Haack, R.A. 2006. Exotic bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera in the United States: Recent establishments and interceptions. Can. J. For. Entomol. 36(2):269-288.
18. Holmes, T.P., J. Aukema, B. Von Holle, A. Liebhold, and E. Sills. 2009. Economic impacts of invasive species in forests: Past, present and future. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1162:18-38.
19. Holmes, T.P., E.A. Murphy, and K.P. Bell. 2006. Exotic forest insects and residential property values. Ag. Res. Econ. Rev. 35(1):155-166.
20. Howard, T., P. Sendak, and C. Codrescu. 2000. Eastern hemlock: A market perspective. P. 161-166 in Proc. of symp. on Sustainable management of hemlock ecosystems in eastern North America. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR-NE-267.
21. Irwin, E. 2002. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Econ. 78(4):465-480.
22. Kuminoff, N.V., C.F. Parmeter, and J.C. Pope. 2009. Averting hidden danger: Developing hedonic specifications that mitigate omitted variable bias. Working Paper, Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
23. Lathrop, R.G. 2000. New Jersey land cover change analysis project. Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. 34 p.
24. Levine, J.M., and C.M. D'Antonio. 2003. Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv. Biol. 17(1):322-326.
25. Liebhold, A.M., W.L. MacDonald, D. Bergdahl, and V.C. Mastro. 1995. Invasion by exotic forest pests: A threat to forest ecosystems. For. Sci. Mon. 30:1-49.
26. Mattson, W.J., P. Niemela, I. Millers, and Y. Inguanzo. 1994. Immigrant phytophagous insects on woody plants in the United States and Canada: An annotated list. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-GTR-169. 27 p.
27. McCullough, D.G., T.T. Work., J.F. Cavey, A.M. Liebhold, and D. Marshall. 2006. Interceptions of nonindigenous plant pests at US ports of entry and border crossings over a 17-year period. Biol. Invasions. 8(4):611-630.
28. Morales, D., B.N. Boyce, and R.J. Favretti. 1976. The contribution of trees to residential property values: Manchester, Connecticut. Valuation Oct/Nov:26-43.
29. Mumford, J.D. 2002. Economic issues related to quarantine in international trade. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 29(2):329-348.
30. Palmquist, R.B. 1991. Hedonic methods. P. 77-120 in Measuring the demand for environmental quality, Braden, J. B. and D.D. Kolstad (eds.). Elsevier, New York, NY.
31. Patterson, R.W., and K.J. Boyle. 2002. Out of sight, out of mind? Using GIS to incorporate visibility in hedonic property value models. Land Econ. 78(3):417-425.
32. Payne, B.R., W.B. White, R.E. McCay, and R.R. McNichols. 1973. Economic analysis of the Gypsy Moth problem in the Northeast: II. Applied to residential property. US For. Serv. Res. Paper NE-285. 6 p.
33. Perrings, C., E.B. Barbier, M. Williamson, D. Delfino, S. Dalmazzone, J. Shogren, P. Simmons, and A. Watkinson. 2002. Biological invasion risks and the public good: An economic perspective. Conserv. Ecol. 6(1):1.
34. Piel, F., M. Gilbert, C. De Cannière, and J.-C. Grégoire. 2008. Coniferous round wood imports from Russia and Baltic countries to Belgium. A pathway analysis for assessing risks of exotic pest insect introductions. Divers. Distrib. 14(2):318-328.
35. Pimentel, D., L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50(1):53-65.
36. Pope, J.C. 2008. Do seller disclosures affect property values? Buyer information and the hedonic model. Land Econ. 84(4):551-572.
37. Powe, N.A., Garrod, G.D., and Willis, K.G. 1995. Valuation of urban amenities using an hedonic price model. J. Property Res. 12(1):137-147.
38. Royle, D.D., and R.G. Lathrop. 1997. Monitoring hemlock forest health in New Jersey using Landsat TM data and change detection techniques. For. Sci. 4(3) 3:327-335.
39. Royle, D.D., and R.G. Lathrop. 2002. Discriminating Tsuga canadensis hemlock forest defoliation using remotely sensed change detection. J. Nematol. 34(2):213-221.
40. Snyder, S.A., M.A. Kilgore, R. Hudson, and J. Donnay. 2007. Determinants of forest land prices in Northern Minnesota: A hedonic pricing approach. For. Sci. 53(1):25-36.
41. Taylor, L.O. 2003. The hedonic method. P. 331-394 in A primer on nonmarket valuation, Champ, P. A., Boyle, K. J. and T.C. Brown (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
42. Thorsnes, P. 2002. The value of a suburban forest preserve: Estimates from sales of vacant residential building lots. Land Econ. 78(3):426-441.
43. Tyrväinen, L., and A. Miettenen. 2000. Property prices and urban forest amenities. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 39(2):205-223.
44. Work, T.T., D.G. McCullough, J.F. Cavey, and R. Komsa. 2005. Arrival rate of nonindigenous insect species into the United States through foreign trade. Biol. Invasions. 7(2):323-332.