A Contentious Triangle: Grading and Academic Freedom in the Academy

Higher Education Quarterly

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-11

  Hill, Duncan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650841119     PISSN: 09515224     EISSN: 14682273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00465.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abbott, A. (2002) The Disciplines and the Future. In S. Brint (ed.), The Future of the City of Intellect: the Changing American University. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 205-230.
2. American Association of University Professors (AAUP) (1967) Joint Statement on Rights and Freedoms of Students., last accessed 10 August 2009.
3. Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) (2005) Policy Statement on Academic Freedom., last accessed 10 August 2009.
4. Education Reform Act (1988), last accessed 21 October 2009.
5. Euben, D. (2001) Who Grades Students? Some Legal Cases, Some Best Practices., last accessed 1 May 2009.
6. Fossey, R. (2007) University Oversight of Professors' Teaching Activities: a Professor's Academic Freedom Does Not Mean Freedom from Institutional Regulation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 19 (3-4), pp. 159-173.
7. Green, J. (2009) U of O Fires Controversial Physics Professor. Ottawa Citizen., last accessed 1 May 2009.
8. Higher Education Act (2004), last accessed 21 October 2009.
9. Jacobson, J. (2001) Court Says Public University Can Fire Professor for Refusing to Change a Grade. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47 (35), p. A14.
10. Karran, T. (2005) Pan-European Grading Scales: Lessons from National Systems and the ECTS. The Bologna Process: Retrospect and Prospects. Higher Education in Europe, 30 (1), pp. 5-22.
11. Karran, T. (2009) Academic Freedom in Europe: Reviewing Unesco's 'Recommendation'. British Journal of Educational Studies, 57 (2), pp. 191-215.
12. Kennedy, D. (1995) 'Another Century's End, Another Revolution for Higher Education', Change, 27 (3), pp. 8-15.
13. Lee, D. E. (2006) Academic Freedom, Critical Thinking and Teaching Ethics. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education: an International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 5 (2), pp. 199-208.
14. O'Neil, R. (2001) Free Speech for Professors: 2 Court Rulings Sound New Alarms. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47 (38), p. B24.
15. Rhoades, G. (2008) The Centrality of Contingent Faculty to Academe's Future. Academe, 94 (6), pp. 12-15., last accessed 1 May 2009.
16. Rosenfield, K. A. (2003) Brown v. Armenti and the First Amendment Protection of Teachers and Professors in Grading their Students. Northwestern University Law Review, 97 (3), pp. 1471-1496.
17. Shils, E. (1995) 'Academic Freedom and Permanent Tenure', Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 33 (1), pp. 5-17.
18. Sung, E. (2003) Mending the Federal Circuit Split on the First Amendment Right of Public University Professors to Assign Grades. New York University Law Review, 78 (4), pp. 1550-1580.
19. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (1998) Records of the General Conference., last accessed 21 October 2009.
20. White, L. (2008) Case in Point: Stronach v. Virginia State U. (2008) Does Academic Freedom Give a Professor the Final Say on Grades? Chronicle of Higher Education, 54 (33), p. A39.