Psychometric properties of the Brief Pain Inventory among patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total hip replacement surgery

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 8, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Kapstad, Heidi ^a,b,c   Rokne, Berit ^b   Stavem, Knut ^d,e  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH EASTERN NORWAY   (Norway)

^d AKERSHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRIEF PAIN INVENTORY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MARITAL STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL CLASS;

EID: 78650833526     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-148     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andersson G. Hip assessment: a comparison of nine different methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972, 54:621-625.
2. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969, 51:737-755.
3. Soderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 189-197. 10.1097/00003086-200103000-00022, 11249165.
4. Bachmeier CJ, March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley HM, Tribe KL, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001, 9:137-146. 10.1053/joca.2000.0369, 11330253.
5. Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999, 42:1722-1728. 10.1002/1529-0131(199908)42:8<1722::AID-ANR22>3.0.CO;2-R, 10446873.
6. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnstone DW, Suarez-Almazor ME. Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol 2000, 27:1745-1752.
7. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002, 29:1273-1279.
8. Fortin PR, Penrod JR, Clarke AE, St Pierre Y, Joseph L, Belisle P, Liang MH, Ferland D, Phillips CB, Mahomed N, Tanzer M, Sledge C, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum 2002, 46:3327-3330. 10.1002/art.10631, 12483739.
9. Mahon JL, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Feeny DH, Stitt L, Webster-Bogaert S. Health-related quality of life and mobility of patients awaiting elective total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study. CMAJ 2002, 167:1115-1121. 134291, 12427702.
10. Salaffi F, Carotti M, Grassi W. Health-related quality of life in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: comparison of generic and disease-specific instruments. Clin Rheumatol 2005, 24:29-37. 10.1007/s10067-004-0965-9, 15674656.
11. Quintana JM, Escobar A, Bilbao A, Arostegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005, 13:1076-1083. 10.1016/j.joca.2005.06.012, 16154777.
12. Cleeland C. Pain assessment in cancer. Effect of cancer on quality of life 1991, 293-305. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Osoba D.
13. Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain 2004, 20:309-318. 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00005, 15322437.
14. Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain 2004, 5:133-137. 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005, 15042521.
15. Mendoza T, Mayne T, Rublee D, Cleeland C. Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis. Eur J Pain 2006, 10:353-361. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.002, 16051509.
16. Williams VSL, Smith MY, Fehnel SE. The Validity and Utility of the BPI Interference Measures for Evaluating the Impact of Osteoarthritic Pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006, 31:48-57. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.06.008, 16442482.
17. Tyler EJ, Jensen MP, Engel JM, Schwartz L. The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:236-239. 10.1053/apmr.2002.27466, 11833028.
18. Gjeilo KH, Stenseth R, Wahba A, Lydersen S, Klepstad P. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory in Patients Six Months After Cardiac Surgery. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007, 34:648-656. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.01.010, 17629665.
19. Bellamy N. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index: user guide V 2002, Queensland, Australia.
20. Bellamy NB. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833-1840.
21. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993, 2:217-227. 10.1002/hec.4730020305, 8275167.
22. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30:473-483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002, 1593914.
23. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide 1993, Boston, MA, USA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute.
24. Klepstad P, Loge JH, Borchgrevink PC, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS, Kaasa S. The Norwegian brief pain inventory questionnaire: translation and validation in cancer pain patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002, 24:517-525. 10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00526-2, 12547051.
25. Radbruch L, Loick G, Kiencke P, Lindena G, Sabatowski R, Grond S, et al. Validation of the German Version of the Brief Pain Inventory. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999, 18:180-187. 10.1016/S0885-3924(99)00064-0, 10517039.
26. Cleeland Charles S. The Brief Pain Inventory. User Guide 2009, Houston, Texas.
27. Kirschner S, Walther M, Bohm D, Matzer M, Heesen T, Faller H, Konig A. German short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D): comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC in a prospective evaluation in patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Rheumatol Int 2003, 23:15-20.
28. Kapstad H, Rustoen T, Hanestad BR, Moum T, Langeland N, Stavem K. Changes in pain, stiffness and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis waiting for hip or knee joint replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15:837-843. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.01.015, 17344069.
29. Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK, Bellamy N. Performance of the Norwegian version of AUSCAN - a disease-specific measure of hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005, 13:561-567. 10.1016/j.joca.2005.02.013, 15896986.
30. Kelly KD, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Newman SC, Suarez-Almazor ME. Change in pain and function while waiting for major joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:351-359. 10.1054/arth.2001.21455, 11307134.
31. Kiebzak GM, Campbell M, Mauerhan DR. The SF-36 general health status survey documents the burden of osteoarthritis and the benefits of total joint arthroplasty: but why should we use it?. Am J Manag Care 2002, 8:463-474.
32. Ostendorf M, Buskens E, van Stel H, Schrijvers A, Marting L, Dhert W, Verbout A. Waiting for total hip arthroplasty: avoidable loss in quality time and preventable deterioration. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:302-309. 10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.015, 15067641.
33. Zelman DC, Hoffman DL, Seifeldin R, Dukes EM. Development of a metric for a day of manageable pain control: derivation of pain severity cut-points for low back pain and osteoarthritis. Pain 2003, 106:35-42. 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00274-4, 14581108.
34. Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, Kvien TK. Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:1069-1076. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00098-5, 9817124.
35. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16:297-334.
36. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes 2007, Chichester, UK: John Wiley, second.
37. Wyrwich KW, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, Hays RD, Patrick DL, Symonds T. Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res 2005, 14:285-295. 10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2, 15892420.
38. Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2008, 61:102-109. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012, 18177782.
39. SooHoo NF, Vyas RM, Samimi DB, Molina R, Lieberman JR. Comparison of the Responsiveness of the SF-36 and WOMAC in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1168-1173. 10.1016/j.arth.2006.10.006, 18078886.
40. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?. Qual Life Res 1995, 4:293-307. 10.1007/BF01593882, 7550178.
41. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2001, 54:1204-1217. 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00407-3, 11750189.
42. Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain 2004, 5:133-137. 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005, 15042521.