Bio cooperative robotic platform for motor function recovery of the upper limb after stroke

2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 4472-4475

  Rodriguez Guerrero, C ^a   Fraile Marinero, J ^a   Perez Turiel, J ^a   Rivera Farina, P ^a  

^a Centro de Automatizacion Robotica y Tecnologias de La Informacion y de La Fabricacion   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATIVE ROBOTICS; FEEDBACK TECHNIQUES; MOTOR FUNCTION; REHABILITATION THERAPY; UPPER LIMBS;

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS;

ROBOTS;

ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; CONVALESCENCE; COOPERATION; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMAN; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; ROBOTICS;

BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 78650831123     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626052     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. P. Lum, D. Reikensmeyer, R. Mahoney, W. Rymer, and C. Burgar, "Clinical considerations in the use of robotic devices for movement therapy following stroke," Top stroke rehab, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 40-53, 2002.
2. T. Platz, "[evidence-based arm rehabilitation-a systematic review of the literature]," Nervenarzt, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 841-849, Oct 2003. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00115-003-1549-7
3. N. Hogan, H. Krebs, J. Charnnarong, P. Srikrishna, and A. Sharon, "Mitmanus: a workstation for manual therapy and training. i," in Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, 1992, pp. 161-165.
4. P. Lum, C. Burgar, P. Shor, M. Majmundar, and M. V. der Loos, "Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper limb motor function after stroke," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 952-959, 2002.
5. P. van de Hel, B. Driessen, M. Oderwald, S.Coote, and E. Stokes, "Gentle/s: Robot mediated therapy for stroke patients in a virtual world makes exercising more enjoyable and effective," Assistive technology - added value to the quality of life AAATE'01, IOS Press Amsterdam, pp. 256-261, 2001.
6. C. Rodríguez, J. Fraile, and J. Turiel, "Robot adaptive behavior to suit patient needs and enable more intensive rehabilitation tasks." in IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, vol. 5, April 2009.
7. D. Novak, J. Ziherl, A. Olensek, M. Milavec, j. Podobnik, M. Mielhj, and M. Munih, "Psychophysiological responses to robotic rehabilitation tasks in stroke," IEEE Trans. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (in press), 2009.
8. B. Goslin, R. Olson, A. McDonald, G. Russi, and V. Moudgil, "Longitudinal modeling of the relationship between age and maximal heart rate," Medicine Science in Sports Exercise, no. 7, pp. 822-828, May 2007.
9. G. Kwakkel, R. van Peppen, R. Wagenaar, S. Wood, and C. Richards, "Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a metaanalysis," Stroke, vol. 35, pp. 25-39, 2004.
10. M. Cristea and M. Levin, "Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors," Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2007.