Employee driven innovation in team (EDIT) - innovative potential, dialogue, and dissensus

International Journal of Action Research

Volumn 6, Issue 2-3, 2010, Pages 155-195

  Kristiansen, Marianne ^a   Bloch Poulsen, Jørgen ^b  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Action research; Dialogue; Dissensus; Employee driven innovation; Participation; Team

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650815032     PISSN: 18611303     EISSN: 18619916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1688/1861-9916_IJAR_2010_02-03_Kristiansen     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Action Research (2009): Special issue on communicative space. In: Action Research, 7(3).
2. Amidon, D. (2003): The innovation superhighway: harnessing intellectual capital for collaborative advantage. Boston, MA.: Butterworth-Heinemann.
3. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1996): Organizational Learning, II. Reading, MA.: Addison- Wesley.
4. Bakhtin, M. (1981): The dialogic imagination: Four essays. In: M. Holquist (Ed.): The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Barker, J. R. (1999): The discipline of teamwork. Participation and concertive control. London: Sage.
6. Bason, C. (2007): Velfærdsinnovation - Ledelse af nytænkning i den offentlige sektor. København: Børsens forlag.
7. Baxter, L.A. (2006): Communication as Dialogue. In: G. Shepherd/J. St. John/T. Striphas (Eds.): Communication as. Perspectives on Theory. London: Sage: 101-109.
8. Bessant, J. (2003): High-Involvement Innovation - Building and Sustaining Competitive Advantage through Continuous Change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Bisgaard, P.; Bloch-Poulsen, J. (2002): Kost og spand - om at tage skeen i egen hånd, - om at tage hånd om sin kollega, - om en kulturrevolution i integreret vedligehold. Vedligehold, Drift & Økonomi, 4, juni.
10. Bohm, D. (1996): On Dialogue. London: Routledge.
11. Bradbury Huang, H. (2010): What is action research? Why the resurgent interest? In: Action Research, 8(1): 71-91.
12. Bryman, A. (2008): Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Buber, M. (1994): I and Thou. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
14. Buber, M. (1965): Elements of the Interhuman. In: M. Friedman (Ed.): The Knowledge of Man. New York: Harper & Row Publishers: 72-88.
15. Chambers, R. (1997): Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London: Intermediate Technology Publication.
16. Clemmensen, K.; Kristiansen, M.; Bloch-Poulsen, J. (2009): Det koster lidt i starten, men det er hurtigt tjent ind - et eksperiment om at dele viden ved overgang til et nyt project på Danfoss Solar Inverters. In: Projektledelse, 4: 18-19.
17. Coghlan, D.; Brannick, T. (2005): Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. London: Sage.
18. Coleman, G.; Gearty, M. (2007): Making Space for Difference: The CARPP Approach to Action Research. In: International Journal of Action Research, 3(1+2): 190-214.
19. Cornwall, A.; Pratt, G. (2003): Pathways to Participation. Reflections on PRA. Wiltshire: ITDG Publishing.
20. Davies, B.; Harré, R. (1999): Positioning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Deetz, S. (2001): Conceptual Foundations. In: F. M. Jablin/L. L. Putnam (Eds.): The New Handbook of Organizational Communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage: 3-46.
22. Eikeland, O. (2006): The Validity of Action Research - Validity in Action Research. In: K. Aagaard Nielsen; L. Svensson (Eds.): Action Research and Interactive Research. Maastricht: Shaker publishing: 193-240.
23. Eisenberg, E.; Goodall, H.L. (1997): Organizational Communication. Balancing Creativity and Constraint. New York: St. Martin's Press.
24. Ellström, P-E. (2010): Practice-based innovation: a learning perspective. In: Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2): 27-40.
25. Fagerberg, J.; Mowery, D. C.; Nelson, R. (Eds.) (2005): Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Feldman M.S.; Pentland, B.T. (2003): Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1): 94-118.
27. Florida R. (2002): The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
28. Fricke, W. (1983): Participatory Research and Enhancement of Worker's Innovative Qualifications. In: Journal of Occupational Behavior, 4(1): 73-87.
29. Fricke, W. (2009): Innovatorische Qualifikationen. Ihre Entfaltung und Anwendung im Prozess des Lernens und Handelns in Arbeitssituationen. In: A. Bolder; R. Dobischat (Eds.): Eigen-sinn und Wiederstand. Kritische Beiträge zum Kompetenzentwicklungsdiskurs. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaft: 179-207.
30. Gaventa, J.; Cornwall, A. (2008): Power and Knowledge. In: P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.) (2008): The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage: 172-189.
31. Geertz, C. (1973): The interpretation of cultures. New York. Basic Books.
32. Greenwood, D. J. (2007): Pragmatic Action Research. In: International Journal of Action Research, 3(1-2): 131-148.
33. Greenwood, D. J.; Levin, M. (1998): Introduction to Action Research. London: Sage.
34. Gunnarsson, E. (2007): Other Sides of the Coin. A Feminist Perspective on Robustness in Science and Knowledge Production. In: International Journal of Action Research, 3(2): 349-363.
35. Gustavsen, B. (1992): Dialogue and development. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum.
36. Gustavsen, B. (2005): Innovation and action research. In: International Journal of Action Research, 1(3): 267-289.
37. Habermas, J. (1981): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, I-II. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
38. Hoeve, A.; Nieuwenhuis, L.F.M. (2006): Learning routines in innovation processes. In: Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(3): 171-185.
39. Hohn H. (2000): Playing, leadership and team development in innovative teams. Euboran: Delft.
40. Høyrup, S. (2010): Introduction: Employee-driven innovation and workplace learning: basic concepts, approaches and themes. In: transfer, 16(2): 143-154.
41. Høyrup, S.; Møller, K.; Sø Rocha, R. (2010): Editorial. In: transfer, 16(2): 131-134.
42. Isaacs, W. (1999): Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together. New York: Currency, Doubleday.
43. Ison, R. (2008): Systems Thinking and Practice for Action Research. In: P. Reason; H. Bradbury (Eds.): The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage: 139-158.
44. Janis, I. (1982): Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
45. Johannisson, B.; Gunnarsson, E.; Stjernberg, T. (Eds.) (2008): Gemensamt kunskapande - den interaktive forskningens praktik. Växjö: Växjö University Press.
46. Johansson, A. W.; Lindhult, E. (2008): Emancipation or workability? Critical versus pragmatic scientific orientation in action research. In: Action Research, 6(1): 95-115.
47. Kemmis, S. (2008): Critical theory and participatory action research. In: P. Reason; H. Bradbury (Eds.): The Sage Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage: 121-138.
48. Kristensen, T. S. (2007): Fakta og myter om stress. København: Videnscenter for Arbejdsmiljø (www.arbejdsmiljovidendk;stresspjece.pdf).
49. Kristiansen, M. (2007): Relational and existential challenges of practicing dialogic action research - working with social concrete blocks in organizations. In: International Journal of Action Research, 3(1-2): 15-37.
50. Kristiansen, M.; Bloch-Poulsen, J. (2000): The Challenge of the Unspoken in Organizations: Caring Container as a Dialogic Answer? In: Southern Communication Journal, 65(2; 3): 176-190.
51. Kristiansen, M.; Bloch-Poulsen, J. (2004): Self-referentiality as a power mechanism. Towards dialogic action research. In: Action Research, 2(4): 371-388.
52. Kristiansen, M.; Bloch-Poulsen, J. (2005): Midwifery and Dialogue in Organizations. Emergent, Mutual Involvement in Action Research. München: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
53. Kristiansen, M.; Bloch-Poulsen, J. (2006): Involvement as a Dilemma. Between Dialogue and Discussion in Team Based Organizations. In: International Journal of Action Research, 2(2): 163-197.
54. Kristiansen, M.; Bloch-Poulsen, J. (2009a): Sådan kan man fremme medarbejderdreven innovation - værktøjer til innovationsledelse af team. In: ledelseidag.dk, 9, Oktober.
55. Kristiansen, M.; Bloch-Poulsen, J. (2009b): Medarbejderdreven innovation i team (MIT) om dialogiske organiseringsprocesser i og på tværs af team. Erhvervspsykologi, 7(4): 52-68.
56. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.) (1992): National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
57. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988): Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national innovation systems. In: G. Dosi; C. Freeman; R. R. Nelson; G. Silverberg; L. Soete (Eds.): Technology and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.
58. Lundvall, B.-Å. et al. (1999): Det danske innovationssystem - DISKO-projekt: Rapport nr. 9. Sammenfattende rapport (www.ebst.dk; publikationer; rapporter; innovationssystem).
59. Martin, A. W. (2008): Action research on a large scale: Issues and practices. In: P. Reason; H. Bradbury (Eds.): The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage: 394-406.
60. Møller K. (2010): European innovation policy: A brought-based strategy? In: transfer, 16(2): 155-169.
61. Nielsen, K. A.; Svensson (Eds.) (2006): Action research and Interactive Research. Beyond practice and theory. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.
62. Nielsen, P. (2004): Personale i Vidensøkonomien - Innovation, vidensorganisationer og kompetenceudvikling i det nye årtusinde. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
63. Nowotny, H.; Scott, P.; Gibbons, M. (2001) Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. London: Polity Press.
64. Olesen, H. S. (2010): Guest Editor's introduction. In: Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1; 2): 5-12.
65. Pearce, W. B.; Pearce, K. A. (2004): Taking a Communication Perspective on Dialogue. In: R. Anderson; L. Baxter; K.N. Cissna (Eds.): Dialogue - Theorizing Differences in Communication Studies. London: Sage: 39-56.
66. Pearce, W. B. (2007): Making Social Worlds: A Communication Perspective. London: Blackwell Publishers.
67. Pedersen, C. H.; Olesen, B. R. (2008): What Knowledge - Which Relationships? Sharing Dilemmas of an Action Researcher. In: International Journal of Action Research, 4(3): 254-290.
68. Phillips, L. (2009): Analysing the Dialogic Turn in the Communication of Research-Based Knowledge: An Exploration of the Tensions in Collaborative Research. In: Public Understanding of Science, June, 1-21.
69. Pålshaugen Ø. (1998): The End of Organization Theory? Language as a tool in action research and organizational development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
70. Reason, P.; Bradbury, H. (Eds.) (2008): The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.
71. Reason, P.; Bradbury, H. (Eds.) (2001): Introduction: Inquiry and Participation in Search of a World Worthy of Human Aspiration. In: Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage: 1-14.
72. Reid, C.; Frisby, W. (2008): Continuing the Journey: Articulating Dimensions of Feminist Participatory Research (FPAR): In: P. Reason; H. Bradbury (Eds.): The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage: 93-105.
73. Schumpeter, J. (1934): The theory of economic development. Boston. MA.: Oxford University Press.
74. Shotter, J.; Gustavsen, B. (1999): The role of dialogue conferences in the development of learning regions: Doing from within our lives together what we cannot do apart. Stockholm: Swedish Center for Advanced Studies in Leadership. Stockholm School of Economics.
75. Stacey, R. D. (2001): Complex responsive processes in organizations. Learning and knowledge creation. New York: Routledge.
76. Stacey, R. D. (2003): Complexity and Group Processes. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
77. Stewart, J. (1999): Bridges not Walls. Boston: McGraw-Hill College.
78. Stewart, J.; Zediker, K. E.; Black, L. (2004): Relationships Among Philosophies of Dialogue. In: R. Anderson; L. Baxter; K. Cissna (Eds.) (2004): Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies. London: Sage: 21-38.
79. Therkelsen, H. (2010): Der er plads til det hele liv. KOM magasinet, 46, 34-37. (http:; www.kommunikationogsprog.dk;moduler;Magasiner;frontend;index.asp?id=0&type=10&MagasinId=234&articleId=2942).
80. Tidd, J.; Bessant, J. (2009): Managing Innovation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
81. Waring, S. P. (1991): Taylorism transformed. Scientific Management Theory since 1945. Chapel Hill, N.C.: The University of North Carolina Press.
82. Vindeløv, V. (2007): Mediation - a non-model. København: Juristog Økonomforbundets forlag.
83. van Beinum, H.; Faucheux, C.; van der Vlist, R. (1996): In: S. Toulmin; B. Gustavsen, Beyond Theory. Changing Organizations Through Participation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 179-201.
84. White, A. M. (2003): Lewińs Action Research Model as a Tool for Theory Building - A Case Study from South Africa. In: Action Research, 2(3): 127-144.
85. Wicks, G. P.; Reason, P. (2009): Initiating action research - Challenges and paradoxes of opening communicative space. In: Action Research, 7(3): 243-262.