Bark anatomy of Quercus cerris L. var. cerris from Turkey;Türkiye'deki Quercus cerris L. var. cerris'in kabuk anatomisi

Turkish Journal of Botany

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 45-55

  Şen, Ali ^a   Quilhó, Teresa ^b   Pereira, Helena ^c  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA TROPICAL   (Portugal)

^c Universidade de Lisboa   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Periderm; Phloem; Quercus cerris; Rhytidome

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; BARK; PHLOEM; SHRUB; TREE; TYPE SPECIMEN;

KAHRAMANMARAS; TURKEY;

QUERCUS; QUERCUS CERRIS;

EID: 78650805248     PISSN: 1300008X     EISSN: 13036106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3906/bot-1002-33     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alonso AA & Machado SR (2008). Stem protective tissue in Erythroxylum tortuosum (Erythroxylaceae). A fire tolerant species from cerrado. IAWA J 29: 69-77.
2. Babos K (1979a). Anatomische Untersuchungen der Rinde bei den Stammen von Quercus cerris var. cerris Loud. und Quercus cerris var. austrica (Willd.) Loud. Folia Dendrol 6: 60-78.
3. Babos K (1979b). Fibre characteristics of some cuba hardwoods. IAWA Bull 2/3: 61-62.
4. Barlow PW & Luck J (2006). Patterned cell development in the secondary phloem of dicotyledonous trees: a review and Hypothesis. J Plant Res 119: 271-291.
5. Borazan A & Babac MT (2003). Morphometric leaf variation in oaks (Quercus) of Bolu, Turkey. Ann Bot Fennici 40: 233-242.
6. Cabi E, Doǧan M, Mavi O, Karabacak E & Başer B (2010). Elymus sosnowskyi (Hackel) Melderis (Poaceae), a rare endemic species in Turkey. Turk J Bot 34: 105-114.
7. Costa A, Pereira H & Oliveira A (2002). Influence of climate on the seasonality of radial growth of cork oak during a production cycle. Ann For Sci 59: 429-437.
8. Dickison WC (2000). Integrative Plant Anatomy, USA. Elsevier Publ. Graca J & Pereira H (2004). The periderm development in Quercus suber. IAWA J 25: 325-335.
9. Guvenc A & Duman H (2010). Morphological and anatomical studies of annual taxa of Sideritis L. (Lamiaceae), with notes on chorology in Turkey. Turk J Bot, 34: 83-104.
10. Hedge IC & Yalti{dotless}ri{dotless}k F (1982). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburg: Edinburgh Univ Press.
11. Howard ET (1977). Bark structure of the Southern Upland Oaks. Wood and Fiber 9: 172-183.
12. Junikka L (1994). Survey of English macroscopic bark terminology. IAWA J 15: 3-45.
13. Machado SR, Marcati CR, Morretes BL & Angyalossi V (2005). Comparative bark anatomy of root and stem in Styrax Camporum (Styracaceae). IAWA J 26: 477-487.
14. Marcati CR & Angyalossi V (2005). Seazonal presence of acicular crystals in the cambial zone of Citharexylum myrianthum (Verbenaceae). IAWA J 25: 93-98.
15. Mi{dotless}hci{dotless}oǧlu K (1942). Turkiye'de Sacli{dotless} Meşeden Mantar İstihsaline Dair Bir Araşti{dotless}rma. Orman ve Av 1: 151-166.
16. Natividade JV (1950). Subericultura. Lisboa Ministerio da Economia, Direccao Geral dos Servicos Florestais e Aquicolas.
17. Ozcan T (2007). Characterization of Turkish Quercus L. taxa based on fatty acid compositions of the acorns. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 84: 653-662.
18. Ozcan T & Baycu G (2005). Some elemental concentration in the acorns of Turkish Quercus L. (Fagaceae) taxa. Pak J Bot 37: 361-371.
19. Pereira H (2007). Cork: Biology, Production and Uses. Amsterdam. Elsevier Publ.
20. Pereira H, Graca J & Baptista C (1992). The effect of growth rate on the structure and compressive properties of cork from Quercus suber L. IAWA Bull 13: 389-396.
21. Pereira H, Rosa ME & Fortes MA (1987). The cellular structure of cork from Quercus suber L. IAWA Bull 8: 213-218.
22. Quilho T, Lopes F & Pereira H (2003). The effect of tree shelter on the stem anatomy of cork oak (Quercus suber) plants. IAWA J 24: 385-395.
23. Quilho T, Pereira H & Richter HG (1999). Variability of bark structure in plantation-grown Eucalyptus globules. IAWA J 20: 171-180.
24. Richter HG, Mazzoni-Viveiros SC, Alves ES, Luchi AE & Costa CG (1996). Padronizacao de criterios para a descricao anatomica da casca: lista de caracteristicas e glossario de termos. Ver Inst Flor IF Série Reg 16: 1-25.
25. Roth I (1981). Structural Patterns of Tropical Barks. Berlim. Gebr. Borntraeger
26. Telgeren G (1976). Memleketimizde yetişen sacli{dotless} meşe aǧaclari{dotless}ni{dotless}n kabuklari{dotless}ndan yararlanma olanaklari{dotless}. Ormanci{dotless}li{dotless}k Araşti{dotless}rma Enstitüsü Dergisi 22: 114-127.
27. Trockenbrodt M (1990). Survey and discussion of the terminology used in bark anatomy. IAWA Bull 11: 141-166.
28. Trockenbrodt M (1991). Qualitative structural changes during bark development in Quercus robur, Ulmus glabra, Populus tremula and Betula pendula. IAWA Bull 12: 5-22.
29. Trockenbrodt M (1994). Quantitative changes of some anatomical charcters during bark development in Quercus robur, Ulmus glabra, Populus tremula and Betula pendula IAWA J 15: 387-398.
30. Trockenbrodt M (1995a). Calcium oxalate crystals in the bark of Quercus robur, Ulmus glabra, Populus tremula and Betula pendula. Ann of Bot 75: 281-284.
31. Trockenboldt M (1995b). Structure and identification of root bark of Quercus robur L. Trees 9: 341-347.
32. Withmore TC (1962). Studies in systematic bark morphology IV. The bark of beech, oak and sweet chestnut. New Phytol 62: 161-169.
33. Yalti{dotless}ri{dotless}k F (1984) Türkiye Meşeleri Teşhis Ki{dotless}lavuzu. İstanbul Yenilik Basi{dotless}mevi