Random walks for text semantic similarity

ACL-IJCNLP 2009 - TextGraphs 2009: 2009 Workshop on Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 23-31

  Ramage, Daniel ^a   Rafferty, Anna N ^a   Manning, Christopher D ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES; SEMANTICS; VECTOR SPACES;

LEXICAL RESOURCES; RECOGNIZING TEXTUAL ENTAILMENTS; RELATIVE REDUCTION; SEMANTIC INFORMATION; SEMANTIC RESOURCES; SEMANTIC SIGNATURES; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; STATIONARY DISTRIBUTION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 78650787255     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1708124.1708131     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. E. Agirre and A. Soroa. 2009. Personalizing pagerank for word sense disambiguation. In EACL, Athens, Greece.
2. R. Bar-Haim, I. Dagan, B. Dolan, L. Ferro, D. Giampiccolo, B. Magnini, and I. Szpektor. 2006. The 2nd PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge. In PASCAL Challenges Workshop on RTE.
3. A. Berger and J. Lafferty. 1999. Information retrieval as statistical translation. SIGIR 1999, pages 222- 229.
4. P. Berkhin. 2005. A survey on pagerank computing. Internet Mathematics, 2(1):73-120.
5. A. Budanitsky and G. Hirst. 2006. Evaluating wordnet-based measures of lexical semantic relatedness. Computational Linguistics, 32(1):13-47.
6. N. Chambers, D. Cer, T. Grenager, D. Hall, C. Kiddon, B. MacCartney, M. de Marneffe, D. Ramage, E. Yeh, and C. D. Manning. 2007. Learning alignments and leveraging natural logic. In ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing.
7. K. Collins-Thompson and J. Callan. 2005. Query expansion using random walk models. In CIKM '05, pages 704-711, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press.
8. C. Corley and R. Mihalcea. 2005. Measuring the semantic similarity of texts. In ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, pages 13-18, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June. ACL.
9. J. R. Curran. 2004. From Distributional to Semantic Similarity. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
10. I. Dagan, O. Glickman, and B. Magnini. 2005. The PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge. In Quinonero-Candela et al., editor, MLCW 2005, LNAI Volume 3944, pages 177-190. Springer- Verlag.
11. B. Dolan, C. Quirk, and C. Brockett. 2004. Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: Exploiting massively parallel news sources. In Coling 2004, pages 350-356, Geneva, Switzerland, Aug 23-Aug 27. COLING.
12. C. Fellbaum. 1998. WordNet: An electronic lexical database. MIT Press.
13. D. Giampiccolo, B. Magnini, I. Dagan, and B. Dolan. 2007. The 3rd PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge. In ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 1-9, Prague, June.
14. O. Glickman, I. Dagan, and M. Koppel. 2005. Web based probabilistic textual entailment. In PASCAL Challenges Workshop on RTE.
15. T. H. Haveliwala. 2002. Topic-sensitive pagerank. In WWW '02, pages 517-526, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
16. T. Hughes and D. Ramage. 2007. Lexical semantic relatedness with random graph walks. In EMNLPCoNLL, pages 581-589.
17. M. Jarmasz and S. Szpakowicz. 2003. Roget's thesaurus and semantic similarity. In Proceedings of RANLP-03, pages 212-219.
18. J. J. Jiang and D. W. Conrath. 1997. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In ROCLING X, pages 19-33.
19. T.K. Landauer, P.W. Foltz, and D. Laham. 1998. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2-3):259-284.
20. L. Lee. 2001. On the effectiveness of the skew divergence for statistical language analysis. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 2001, pages 65-72.
21. M. Lesk. 1986. Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: how to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone. ACM SIGDOC: Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation, 1986:24-26.
22. V. I. Levenshtein. 1966. Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals. Ph.D. thesis, Soviet Physics Doklady.
23. C. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schutze, 2008. Introduction to information retrieval, pages 258-263. Cambridge University Press.
24. R. Mihalcea, C. Corley, and C. Strapparava. 2006. Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. AAAI 2006, 6.
25. E. Minkov and W. W. Cohen. 2007. Learning to rank typed graph walks: Local and global approaches. In WebKDD and SNA-KDD joint workshop 2007.
26. G. Minnen, J. Carroll, and D. Pearce. 2001. Applied morphological processing of English. Natural Language Engineering, 7(03):207-223.
27. A. Montejo-Ráez, J.M. Perea, F. Mart́inez-Santiago, M. A. García-Cumbreras, M. M. Valdivia, and A. Ureña López. 2007. Combining lexical-syntactic information with machine learning for recognizing textual entailment. In ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 78-82, Prague, June. ACL.
28. R. Navigli and P. Velardi. 2005. Structural semantic interconnections: A knowledge-based approach to word sense disambiguation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 27(7):1075-1086.
29. P. Resnik. 1999. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. JAIR, (11):95-130.
30. R. Snow, D. Jurafsky, and A. Y. Ng. 2006. Semantic taxonomy induction from heterogenous evidence. In ACL, pages 801-808.