Molecular phylogeny restores the supra-generic subdivision of homoscleromorph sponges (Porifera, Homoscleromorpha)

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

  Gazave, Eve ^a   Lapébie, Pascal ^a   Renard, Emmanuelle ^a   Vacelet, Jean ^a   Rocher, Caroline ^a   Ereskovsky, Alexander V ^a,b   Lavrov, Dennis V ^c   Borchiellini, Carole ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA 18S; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; RIBOSOME DNA;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENUS; HOMOSCLEROMORPH SPONGES; MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; MONOPHYLY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; SPONGE (PORIFERA); TAXONOMIC RANK; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; METHODOLOGY; PACIFIC OCEAN; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CORTICIUM (PORIFERA); DEMOSPONGIAE; EUMETAZOA; HOMOSCLEROMORPHA; OSCARELLA; OSCARELLIDAE; PLAKINA; PLAKINASTRELLA; PLAKINIDAE; PLAKORTIS; PORIFERA; PSEUDOCORTICIUM;

ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, MITOCHONDRIAL; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; PACIFIC OCEAN; PHYLOGENY; PORIFERA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 78650770445     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014290     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Bowerbank JS (1864) Monograph of the British Spongiadae. London: Ray Society. 290 p.
2. Sollas WJ (1885) A Classification of the Sponges. Ann Mag Nat Hist 5: 395.
3. Schmidt O (1870) Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann. 88 p.
4. Lavrov DV (2007) Key transitions in animal evolution: a mitochondrial DNA perspective. Integrat Comp Biol 47: 734-743.
5. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, et al. (2008) Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452: 745-749.
6. Srivastava M, Begovic E, Chapman J, Putnam NH, Hellsten U, et al. (2008) The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans. Nature 454: 955-960.
7. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, et al. (2009) Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc Biol Sci 276: 4261-4270.
8. Philippe H, Derelle R, Lopez P, Pick K, Borchiellini C, et al. (2009) Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr Biol 19: 706-712.
9. Sperling EA, Peterson KJ, Pisani D (2009) Phylogenetic-signal dissection of nuclear housekeeping genes supports the paraphyly of sponges and the monophyly of Eumetazoa. Mol Biol Evol 26: 2261-2274.
10. Dendy A (1905) Report on the sponges collected by Professor Herdman, at Ceylon, in 1902. London: Royal Society.
11. Sperling EA, Pisani D, Peterson KJ (2007) Poriferan Paraphyly and its Implications for Precambrian Paleobiology. London: Geological Society. pp 355-368.
12. Dohrmann M, Janussen D, Reitner J, Collins AG, Wörheide G (2008) Phylogeny and evolution of glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Syst Biol 57: 388-405.
13. Muricy G, Diaz MC (2002) Order Homosclerophorida Dendy, 1905, Family Plakinidae Schulze, 1880. In: Hooper JNA, Van Soest RWM, eds. Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. New-York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. pp 71-82.
14. Diaz MC, Van Soest RWM (1994) The Plakinidae: a systematic review. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema. pp 93-110.
15. Ereskovsky AV, Borchiellini C, Gazave E, Ivanisevic J, Lapebie P, et al. (2009) The Homoscleromorph sponge Oscarella lobularis, a promising sponge model in evolutionary and developmental biology. Bioessays 31: 89-97.
16. Reid REH (1970) Tetraxons and demosponge phylogeny. In: Fry WG, ed. The Biology of Porifera. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 25. London: Academic Press. pp 63-89.
17. Wiedenmayer F (1994) Contributions to the knowledge of post-palaeozoic neretic and archibenthal sponges (Porifera): The stratigraphic record, ecology, and global distribution of intermediate and higher taxa. Schweiz Paläontol Abh 116: 1-147.
18. Uriz MJ (2006) Mineral skeletogenesis in sponges. Can J Zool 84: 322-356.
19. Uriz MJ, Turon X, Becerro MA, Agell G (2003) Siliceous Spicules and Skeleton Frameworks in Sponges: Origin, Diversity, Ultrastructural Patterns, and Biological Functions. Micr Res Tech 62: 279-299.
20. Lévi C (1956) Etude des Halisarca de Roscoff. Embryologie et systématique des démosponges. Arch Zool Exp Gen 93: 1-184.
21. Lévi C (1973)-Systématique de la classe des Demospongiaria (Démosponges): in Grassé PP, ed. Spongiaires. Paris: Masson & Compagnie. pp 577-632.
22. Hooper JNA, van Soest RWM (2002) Systema Porifera: A guide to the classification of sponges. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
23. Borchiellini C, Chombard C, Manuel M, Alivon E, Vacelet J, et al. (2004) Molecular phylogeny of Demospongiae: implications for classification and scenarios of character evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 32: 823-837.
24. Peterson KJ, Cotton JA, Gehling JG, Pisani D (2008) The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363: 1435-1443.
25. Wang X, Lavrov DV (2008) Seventeen new complete mtDNA sequences reveal extensive mitochondrial genome evolution within the Demospongiae. PLoS ONE 3: e2723.
26. Van Soest RWM (1984) Deficient Merlia normani Kirkpatrick, 1908, from the Curacao reefs, with a discussion on the phylogenetic interpretation of sclerosponges. Bijdr Dierk 54: 211-219.
27. Grothe F (1989) On the phylogeny of homoscleromorphs. Berl Geowiss Abh Reiche A Geolog Palacont 106: 155-164.
28. Boury-Esnault N, Ereskovsky AV, Bezac C, Tokina DB (2003) Larval development in Homoscleromorpha (Porifera, Demospongiae). Invert Biol 122: 187-202.
29. Schulze FE (1880) Untersuchungen über den Bau und die Entwicklung der Spongien. Neunte Mittheilung. Die Plakiniden. Z Wiss Zool Abt A 34: 407-451.
30. Lendenfeld RV (1886) On the Systematic Position and Classification of Sponges. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1886: 558-662.
31. Solé Cava AM, Boury-Esnault N, Vacelet J, Thorpe JP (1992) Biochemical genetic divergence and systematics in sponges of the genera Corticium and Oscarella (Demospongiae: Homoscleromorpha) in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Biol 113: 299-304.
32. Boury-Esnault N, Muricy G, Gallissian MF, Vacelet J (1995) Sponges without skeleton: a new Mediterranean genus of Homoscleromorpha (Porifera, Demospongiae). Ophelia 43: 25-43.
33. Vosmaer GCJ (1884) Studies on sponges: II-IV. Mitt Zool Stat Neapel 5: 483-493.
34. Schmidt O (1862) Die Spongien des Adriatischen Meeres. Leipzig: Verlag Von Wilhelm Engelmann. 88 p.
35. Topsent E (1897) Spongiaires de la Baie d'Amboine. (Voyage de MM. M. Bedot et C. Pictet dans l'Archipel Malais). Rev Suisse Zool 4: 421-487.
36. Manuel M, Borchiellini C, Alivon E, Le Parco Y, Vacelet J, et al. (2003) Phylogeny and evolution of calcareous sponges: monophyly of Calcinea and Calcaronea, high level of morphological moplasy, and the primitive nature of axial symmetry. Syst Biol 52: 311-333.
37. Dohrmann M, Voigt O, Erpenbeck D, Worheide G (2006) Non-monophyly of most supraspecific taxa of calcareous sponges (Porifera, Calcarea) revealed by increased taxon sampling and partitioned Bayesian analysis of ribosomal DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40: 830-843.
38. Lavrov DV, Wang X, Kelly M (2008) Reconstructing ordinal relationships in the Demospongiae using mitochondrial genomic data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 49: 111-124.
39. Nichols SA (2005) An evaluation of support for order-level monophyly and interrelationships within the class Demospongiae using partial data from the large subunit rDNA and cytochrome oxidase subunit I. Mol Phylogenet Evol 34: 81-96.
40. Kornprobst JM (2005) Substances naturelles d'origine marine: Chimiodiversité, pharmacodiversité, biotechnologie. Tome 2: invertébrés-vertébrés. Paris: Lavoisier Publisher.
41. Nichols SA, Dirks W, Pearse JS, King N (2006) Early evolution of animal cell signaling and adhesion genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 12451-12456.
42. Gazave E, Lapebie P, Renard E, Bezac C, Boury-Esnault N, et al. (2008) NK homeobox genes with choanocyte-specific expression in homoscleromorph sponges. Dev Genes Evol 218: 479-489.
43. Lapebie P, Gazave E, Ereskovsky A, Derelle R, Bezac C, et al. (2009) WNT/ beta-catenin signalling and epithelial patterning in the homoscleromorph sponge Oscarella. PLoS ONE 4: e5823.
44. Borchiellini C, Manuel M, Alivon E, Boury-Esnault N, Vacelet J, et al. (2001) Sponge paraphyly and the origin of Metazoa. J Evol Biol 14: 171-179.
45. Gazave E, Carteron S, Richelle-Maurer E, Boury-Esnault N, Borchiellini C, et al. (2010) Polyphyly of the genus Axinella and of the family Axinellidae (Porifera: Demospongiae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 57: 35-47.
46. Burger G, Lavrov DV, Forget L, Lang BF (2007) Sequencing complete mitochondrial and plastid genomes. Nat Protoc 2: 603-614.
47. Meyer M, Stenzel U, Hofreiter M (2008) Parallel tagged sequencing on the 454 platform. Nat Protoc 3: 267-278.
48. Lowe TM, Eddy SR (1997) tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 955-964.
49. Pearson WR (1994) Using the FASTA program to search protein and DNA sequence databases. Methods Mol Biol 25: 365-389.
50. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 113.
51. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792-1797.
52. Hall TA (1999) Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41: 95-8.
53. Castresana J (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17: 540-552.
54. Talavera G, Castresana J (2007) Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol 56: 564-577.
55. Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K (2008) MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform 9: 299-306.
56. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25: 1253-1256.
57. Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G (1984) A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J Mol Evol 20: 86-93.
58. Yang Z (1994) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol 39: 306-314.
59. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52: 696-704.
60. Guindon S, Lethiec F, Duroux P, Gascuel O (2005) PHYML Online-a web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W557-559.
61. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
62. Wheeler WC, Honeycutt RL (1988) Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: Evolutionary and phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Evol 5: 90-96.
63. Dixon MT, Hillis DM (1993) Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 10: 256-267.
64. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
65. Erpenbeck D, List-Armitage SE, Alvarez B, Degnan B, Worheide G, et al. (2007) The systematics of Raspailiidae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida: Microcionina) re-analysed with a ribosomal marker. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 87: 1571-1576.
66. Hofacker IL, Fekete M, Stadler PF (2002) Secondary structure prediction for aligned RNA sequences. J Mol Biol 319: 1059-1066.
67. Hudelot C, Gowri-Shankar V, Jow H, Rattray M, Higgs PG (2003) RNA-based phylogenetic methods: application to mammalian mitochondrial RNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 28: 241-252.
68. Tillier ER, Collins RA (1998) High apparent rate of simultaneous compensatory base-pair substitutions in ribosomal RNA. Genetics 148: 1993-2002.
69. Sanderson MJ, Donoghue MJ, Piel W, Erikson T (1994) TreeBASE: a prototype database of phylogenetic analyses and an interactive tool for browsing the phylogeny of life. Am J bot 81: 183.
70. Morell V (1996) TreeBASE: the roots of phylogeny. Science 273: 569.
71. Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42: 182-192.
72. Huelsenbeck J, Rannala B (2004) Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Syst Biol 53: 904-913.
73. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673-4680.
74. Loytynoja A, Milinkovitch MC (2001) SOAP, cleaning multiple alignments from unstable blocks. Bioinformatics 17: 573-574.
75. Hall BG (2004) Phylogenetic trees made easy: a how-to manual. 2nd ed Sinauer Associates.
76. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
77. Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S (2009) PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25: 2286-2288.
78. Lartillot N, Philippe H (2004) A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1095-1109.
79. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D (2005) ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21: 2104-2105.
80. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM (1992) The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 8: 275-282.
81. Adachi J, Waddell PJ, Martin W, Hasegawa M (2000) Plastid genome phylogeny and a model of amino acid substitution for proteins encoded by chloroplast DNA. J Mol Evol 50: 348-358.
82. Shimodaira H (2002) An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst Biol 51: 492-508.
83. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1114-1116.
84. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (2001) CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17: 1246-1247.
85. Wang X, Lavrov DV (2007) Mitochondrial genome of the homoscleromorph Oscarella carmela (Porifera, Demospongiae) reveals unexpected complexity in the common ancestor of sponges and other animals. Mol Biol Evol 24: 363-373.
86. Lavrov DV, Forget L, Kelly M, Lang BF (2005) Mitochondrial genomes of two demosponges provide insights into an early stage of animal evolution. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1231-1239.
87. Maldonado M, Carmona MC, Uriz MJ, Cruzado A (1999) Decline in Mesozoic reef-building sponges explained by silicon limitation. Nature 401: 785-788.
88. Muricy G, Boury-Esnault N, Bézac C, Vacelet J (1998) Taxonomic revision of the Mediterranean Plakina Schulze (Porifera, Demospongiae, Homoscleromorpha). Zool J Linn Soc 124: 169-203.
89. Muricy G, Solé Cava AM, Thorpe JP, Boury-Esnault N (1996) Genetic evidence for extensive cryptic speciation in the subtidal sponge Plakina trilopha (Porifera: Demospongiae: Homoscleromorpha) from the Western Mediterranea. Mar Ecol Progr 138: 181-187.
90. Van Soest RWM, Boury-Esnault N, Hooper JNA, Rützler K, de Voogd NJ, et al. (2008) World Porifera database http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera.